It Wasn’t A Mistake, An Error, A Slip-Up….

[PoliticalChic]

...it was a purposeful, premeditated, planned lie.


1….it was the modus operandi of the Left: a lie. 'a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth 'the definition of lie


Lies are their way of life.

It is essential to recognize that the word has 'lie' has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that time and again in their posts.




2. “Assume the Left Lies and You Will Discover the Truth: Reflections on the Trump-Russia Collusion Lie”
Assume the Left Lies and You Will Discover the Truth: Reflections on the Trump-Russia Collusion Lie | RealClearPolitics

3. “The Trump-Russia collusion charge and the Donald-Trump-is-an-agent-of-the-Kremlin charge struck me -- and tens of millions of other Americans -- as absurd. Vladimir Putin's influence on the 2016 election was negligible, and as president, Trump has been harder on Russia -- in supporting Ukraine's anti-Russian government, in fighting Syria's pro-Russian government and in confronting Iran's pro-Russian regime -- than Barack Obama was.” Ibid

a. Here’s how negligible: "… the $100,000 spent by the Russian government is laughably small, no matter how precisely targeted. In contrast, the official Trump campaign spent $90 million on digital ads — and, unlike the Russians, had assistance from Facebook employees to target and deploy them effectively. “There’s no way $100,000 in ad budget impacted the election. It’s ridiculous,” García Martínez said."
Did Russia’s Facebook Ads Actually Swing the Election?


b. Here’s how we know that the Kremlin wanted Clinton, with whom they already had a history of bribing to sell out America, for President: the dossier. Clinton and the Russians worked to produce a piece of dezinformatsiya to sink the Trump presidential run.


c. Here’s how we know that Trump was harder on Russia than the ‘flexible’ Obama:

1.Bombed Russian ally, Syria, hitting Russian facilities killing a number of Russian military

2.Pulled out of the Iran deal…a Russian signee

3.Pulled out of Paris Accords….a Russian signee

4.Sanctions against Russia…460 sanctions against individuals and entities

5.Expelled Russian diplomats

6.Gave Ukraine Javelin anti-tank missiles to use against Russian proxies

7. Obama….more flexible, Hillary ‘reset button,’ wouldn’t give Poland defensive missiles, Uranium one deal….

8. At the NATO meeting, he warned Germany not to make huge energy deals enriching Russia….

9. “For years, the Clintons have been taking money from Russia. Usually, the price for a speech was at least $250,000. What does Bill or Hillary have to talk about that would warrant taking that much for speaking for only about 30-45 minutes? It is ironic Hillary claims that Trump is Putin’s puppet, considering she has no problem taking money from shady Russian sources.

10. …something else about Hillary. An FBI informant stated that Russia paid millions of dollars to lobby so that Clinton’s charities would receive assistance. The biggest catch is Hillary was Secretary of State when this occurred. Can we say pay to play? It looks like Hillary knows more about colluding with Russia than anyone else.
Her loud barking about Moscow is a played straight out of the Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals book. Accuse the other side of impropriety while you are doing that same thing. In truth, Russian money was probably used in Hillary’s election campaign.”
Since When Do Democrats Hate Russia?



None of this was unknown to the Liberals, Democrats, Leftists.
Contumely should be heaped on them along with jail sentences.

 

[kyzr]

Its not just the lies, its the deep state coup attempt, its weaponizing the intel agencies, the DOJ and the FBI. Its the biggest scandal in US history.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Its not just the lies, its the deep state coup attempt, its weaponizing the intel agencies, the DOJ and the FBI. Its the biggest scandal in US history.

Watergate was a fraction of the size of this thing. In other news, all ammo is readily available now that Obama is not weaponizing the Bureaus, having them buy ammo with taxpayer funds.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Swamp can't be drained fast enough.

*****SMILE*****

 

[rightwinger]

Its not just the lies, its the deep state coup attempt, its weaponizing the intel agencies, the DOJ and the FBI. Its the biggest scandal in US history.

Some Deep State coup attempt

How did that one work out?
Trump coverup

 

[PoliticalChic]

Its not just the lies, its the deep state coup attempt, its weaponizing the intel agencies, the DOJ and the FBI. Its the biggest scandal in US history.

After the Mueller revelations....there is only one acceptable plan for Trump to follow....;







I wanna hear the Bach’s Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, BWV 582 coming from the White House....

 

[easyt65]

It's also not JUST the LYING, its the continuous, day-after-day LYING without ever having any evidence to substantiate it.

D-Adam Schiff is THE epitome, the poster child, for this. He continuously drones on and on about how there is DEFINITIVE evidence the President colluded with Russia, that HE has definitive evidence the President colluded with Russia, yet he never produces that evidence.

Schiff, who admittedly leaked classified information in an attempt to hurt the President, is content to use the FALSE CLAIM as a driving mechanism / justification for opening an investigation. Ummm, BEEN THERE, DONE THAT! Schiff is just re-enacting what the DOJ, NSA, CIA, and FBI did 2+ years ago - launching a false accusation / narrative based on ZERO evidence to con the FISA Court and Congress into opening a new investigation. The way this is SUPPOSED to work is that the accuser shows evidence a crime has been committed or that there is enough evidence to suggest a crime has been committed. Mueller's report proves there was never any evidence of a crime found, no evidence of collusion.

Not only is Schiff still calling the President a TRAITOR, he is doing so without presenting any evidence. He is also calling the Mueller report - and thus Mueller - a liar.

And anyone still claiming Barr is not factually summarizing what the Mueller report states is moronically suggesting Mueller and his 19 lawyers are sitting back silently, allowing their report / findings to be hijacked to unethically / illegally find the President ''Innocent' of all FALSE accusations / FALSE charges.
-- Not long ago Mueller quickly held a press conference to correct the false statements made about his investigation, but we are asked to believe by snowflakes that he would stay silent now? Bwuhahahahaha!


One last time, if Schiff has anything he should present it...otherwise STFU!

 

[BULLDOG]

Its not just the lies, its the deep state coup attempt, its weaponizing the intel agencies, the DOJ and the FBI. Its the biggest scandal in US history.

After the Mueller revelations....there is only one acceptable plan for Trump to follow....;







I wanna hear the Bach’s Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, BWV 582 coming from the White House....

When did you see the Mueller report?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Woops!!! Was that all of Clinton's and Obama's dealings from the last decade or two.

*****SMILE*****

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. “…the biggest reason I never believed the Russian collusion charge was that the charge emanated from the left. And the left lies about everything.

People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it.

The left wanted to undo the 2016 presidential election from the day Trump won. So they made up the Russian collusion story.





5. …the collusion hoax may well have been an effort to divert attention from the real crimes here: American intelligence agencies' being used to spy on a presidential candidate for the first time in American history; getting Clinton off the hook for her illegal use of a private server while secretary of state; her use of that office to enrich herself and her husband; and her destruction of the evidence once her hidden emails were subpoenaed.

[…and to hide the crime of selling America’s vital asset to the Kremlin for $145 million….and Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all participants in the swindle…..]


If you always doubt a leftist claim, you will almost always be closer to the truth. I employed that rule in concluding the collusion story was a fraud, and it served me well.” Assume the Left Lies and You Will Discover the Truth: Reflections on the Trump-Russia Collusion Lie | RealClearPolitics





Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

View attachment 252680

Swamp can't be drained fast enough.

*****SMILE*****

Correction...Swamp CAN'T be drained. The rot is too deep.

 

[The Original Tree]

Clinton spent $1.5 Billion to lie and cheat and buy her way to The White House.
Looks like The Creator just didn't want her to have the job.

 

[bodecea]

Its not just the lies, its the deep state coup attempt, its weaponizing the intel agencies, the DOJ and the FBI. Its the biggest scandal in US history.

After the Mueller revelations....there is only one acceptable plan for Trump to follow....;







I wanna hear the Bach’s Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, BWV 582 coming from the White House....

Interesting ...threats of assassination of Democrats.

 

[The Original Tree]

...it was a purposeful, premeditated, planned lie.


1….it was the modus operandi of the Left: a lie. 'a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth 'the definition of lie


Lies are their way of life.

It is essential to recognize that the word has 'lie' has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that time and again in their posts.




2. “Assume the Left Lies and You Will Discover the Truth: Reflections on the Trump-Russia Collusion Lie”
Assume the Left Lies and You Will Discover the Truth: Reflections on the Trump-Russia Collusion Lie | RealClearPolitics

3. “The Trump-Russia collusion charge and the Donald-Trump-is-an-agent-of-the-Kremlin charge struck me -- and tens of millions of other Americans -- as absurd. Vladimir Putin's influence on the 2016 election was negligible, and as president, Trump has been harder on Russia -- in supporting Ukraine's anti-Russian government, in fighting Syria's pro-Russian government and in confronting Iran's pro-Russian regime -- than Barack Obama was.” Ibid

a. Here’s how negligible: "… the $100,000 spent by the Russian government is laughably small, no matter how precisely targeted. In contrast, the official Trump campaign spent $90 million on digital ads — and, unlike the Russians, had assistance from Facebook employees to target and deploy them effectively. “There’s no way $100,000 in ad budget impacted the election. It’s ridiculous,” García Martínez said."
Did Russia’s Facebook Ads Actually Swing the Election?


b. Here’s how we know that the Kremlin wanted Clinton, with whom they already had a history of bribing to sell out America, for President: the dossier. Clinton and the Russians worked to produce a piece of dezinformatsiya to sink the Trump presidential run.


c. Here’s how we know that Trump was harder on Russia than the ‘flexible’ Obama:

1.Bombed Russian ally, Syria, hitting Russian facilities killing a number of Russian military

2.Pulled out of the Iran deal…a Russian signee

3.Pulled out of Paris Accords….a Russian signee

4.Sanctions against Russia…460 sanctions against individuals and entities

5.Expelled Russian diplomats

6.Gave Ukraine Javelin anti-tank missiles to use against Russian proxies

7. Obama….more flexible, Hillary ‘reset button,’ wouldn’t give Poland defensive missiles, Uranium one deal….

8. At the NATO meeting, he warned Germany not to make huge energy deals enriching Russia….

9. “For years, the Clintons have been taking money from Russia. Usually, the price for a speech was at least $250,000. What does Bill or Hillary have to talk about that would warrant taking that much for speaking for only about 30-45 minutes? It is ironic Hillary claims that Trump is Putin’s puppet, considering she has no problem taking money from shady Russian sources.

10. …something else about Hillary. An FBI informant stated that Russia paid millions of dollars to lobby so that Clinton’s charities would receive assistance. The biggest catch is Hillary was Secretary of State when this occurred. Can we say pay to play? It looks like Hillary knows more about colluding with Russia than anyone else.
Her loud barking about Moscow is a played straight out of the Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals book. Accuse the other side of impropriety while you are doing that same thing. In truth, Russian money was probably used in Hillary’s election campaign.”
Since When Do Democrats Hate Russia?



None of this was unknown to the Liberals, Democrats, Leftists.
Contumely should be heaped on them along with jail sentences.

Let's not forget how The Podesta Group and Joe Biden worked in The Ukraine to tamper with Ukraininan Elections in an attempt to install Pro Russia Legislators.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

View attachment 252680

Swamp can't be drained fast enough.

*****SMILE*****

Correction...Swamp CAN'T be drained. The rot is too deep.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

View attachment 252680

Swamp can't be drained fast enough.

*****SMILE*****

Correction...Swamp CAN'T be drained. The rot is too deep.

*****SMILE*****

Pretty much.

 

[Edgetho]

It's not completely on the left, PC.

The cucks in the NeverTrump movement were in on it from the very beginning

Julie Kelly on Jonah Goldberg and David French: Not a Fan

She's done two great pieces at American Greatness on these Useless Idiots which I've been derelict in linking:

1,How McCain's Man Spread the Fake Dossier Around and Got the Coup-Ball Rolling

2, NeverTrumper's Critical Complicity in Mainstreaming the Russia Collusion Hoax (with special shout-outs to Noted Skeptics Jonah Goldberg and David French)

Her point about them being "lazy" is well-taken. Yesterday, someone commented on Jonah Goldberg's complete refusal to engage with Mollie Hemingway in a twitter dispute (which he started, of course) on the facts. He just kept offering vague demurrals.

I told a friend: He can't engage. He's read literally nothing about the makings of the dossier, or how the Trump briefing was staged so it could be leaked to CNN, or anything at all -- he only reads headlines on Twitter from Trusted Liberals and Fellow Never-Trumpers, so of course he doesn't read any of this "conspiratorial nonsense" (which just so happens to be, you know, true).

So his only method of "argument" is a sneering dismissal of the opponent's worthiness to engage with him. But that's not just arrogance; that's him covering up for the fact that he literally has no idea what the terms of discussion even are and he is petrified of having to guess and bluff his way through any discussion that gets off his preferred plane of surface-level snark and Star Trek references.

He'd be revealed as the Goucher School of Cartooning, Pet Grooming, and Clown Science blufferthat he's been his whole fucking life. Oh, and he's probably sneak in his six-thousandth repetition of a reference that he and no one else thinks is funny: "gas-station sushi."

In the sidebar @ Ace of Spades HQ

 

[PoliticalChic]

Its not just the lies, its the deep state coup attempt, its weaponizing the intel agencies, the DOJ and the FBI. Its the biggest scandal in US history.

After the Mueller revelations....there is only one acceptable plan for Trump to follow....;







I wanna hear the Bach’s Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, BWV 582 coming from the White House....

Interesting ...threats of assassination of Democrats.

Yeah......wadda' ya' wanna do about it....?????


I have an Old Testament view of traitors...
“We should forgive our enemies, but not before they are hanged”― Heinrich Heine

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's not completely on the left, PC.

The cucks in the NeverTrump movement were in on it from the very beginning

Julie Kelly on Jonah Goldberg and David French: Not a Fan

She's done two great pieces at American Greatness on these Useless Idiots which I've been derelict in linking:

1,How McCain's Man Spread the Fake Dossier Around and Got the Coup-Ball Rolling

2, NeverTrumper's Critical Complicity in Mainstreaming the Russia Collusion Hoax (with special shout-outs to Noted Skeptics Jonah Goldberg and David French)

Her point about them being "lazy" is well-taken. Yesterday, someone commented on Jonah Goldberg's complete refusal to engage with Mollie Hemingway in a twitter dispute (which he started, of course) on the facts. He just kept offering vague demurrals.

I told a friend: He can't engage. He's read literally nothing about the makings of the dossier, or how the Trump briefing was staged so it could be leaked to CNN, or anything at all -- he only reads headlines on Twitter from Trusted Liberals and Fellow Never-Trumpers, so of course he doesn't read any of this "conspiratorial nonsense" (which just so happens to be, you know, true).

So his only method of "argument" is a sneering dismissal of the opponent's worthiness to engage with him. But that's not just arrogance; that's him covering up for the fact that he literally has no idea what the terms of discussion even are and he is petrified of having to guess and bluff his way through any discussion that gets off his preferred plane of surface-level snark and Star Trek references.

He'd be revealed as the Goucher School of Cartooning, Pet Grooming, and Clown Science blufferthat he's been his whole fucking life. Oh, and he's probably sneak in his six-thousandth repetition of a reference that he and no one else thinks is funny: "gas-station sushi."

In the sidebar @ Ace of Spades HQ

I'm down witcha' on dat, Edgy!!!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

...it was a purposeful, premeditated, planned lie.


1….it was the modus operandi of the Left: a lie. 'a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth 'the definition of lie


Lies are their way of life.

It is essential to recognize that the word has 'lie' has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that time and again in their posts.




2. “Assume the Left Lies and You Will Discover the Truth: Reflections on the Trump-Russia Collusion Lie”
Assume the Left Lies and You Will Discover the Truth: Reflections on the Trump-Russia Collusion Lie | RealClearPolitics

3. “The Trump-Russia collusion charge and the Donald-Trump-is-an-agent-of-the-Kremlin charge struck me -- and tens of millions of other Americans -- as absurd. Vladimir Putin's influence on the 2016 election was negligible, and as president, Trump has been harder on Russia -- in supporting Ukraine's anti-Russian government, in fighting Syria's pro-Russian government and in confronting Iran's pro-Russian regime -- than Barack Obama was.” Ibid

a. Here’s how negligible: "… the $100,000 spent by the Russian government is laughably small, no matter how precisely targeted. In contrast, the official Trump campaign spent $90 million on digital ads — and, unlike the Russians, had assistance from Facebook employees to target and deploy them effectively. “There’s no way $100,000 in ad budget impacted the election. It’s ridiculous,” García Martínez said."
Did Russia’s Facebook Ads Actually Swing the Election?


b. Here’s how we know that the Kremlin wanted Clinton, with whom they already had a history of bribing to sell out America, for President: the dossier. Clinton and the Russians worked to produce a piece of dezinformatsiya to sink the Trump presidential run.


c. Here’s how we know that Trump was harder on Russia than the ‘flexible’ Obama:

1.Bombed Russian ally, Syria, hitting Russian facilities killing a number of Russian military

2.Pulled out of the Iran deal…a Russian signee

3.Pulled out of Paris Accords….a Russian signee

4.Sanctions against Russia…460 sanctions against individuals and entities

5.Expelled Russian diplomats

6.Gave Ukraine Javelin anti-tank missiles to use against Russian proxies

7. Obama….more flexible, Hillary ‘reset button,’ wouldn’t give Poland defensive missiles, Uranium one deal….

8. At the NATO meeting, he warned Germany not to make huge energy deals enriching Russia….

9. “For years, the Clintons have been taking money from Russia. Usually, the price for a speech was at least $250,000. What does Bill or Hillary have to talk about that would warrant taking that much for speaking for only about 30-45 minutes? It is ironic Hillary claims that Trump is Putin’s puppet, considering she has no problem taking money from shady Russian sources.

10. …something else about Hillary. An FBI informant stated that Russia paid millions of dollars to lobby so that Clinton’s charities would receive assistance. The biggest catch is Hillary was Secretary of State when this occurred. Can we say pay to play? It looks like Hillary knows more about colluding with Russia than anyone else.
Her loud barking about Moscow is a played straight out of the Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals book. Accuse the other side of impropriety while you are doing that same thing. In truth, Russian money was probably used in Hillary’s election campaign.”
Since When Do Democrats Hate Russia?



None of this was unknown to the Liberals, Democrats, Leftists.
Contumely should be heaped on them along with jail sentences.

Let's not forget how The Podesta Group and Joe Biden worked in The Ukraine to tamper with Ukraininan Elections in an attempt to install Pro Russia Legislators.

More:

Joe Biden and the Democrats prevented our intelligence agencies from infiltrating the savages who killled 3000 Americans in New York.


"[C]hairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Joseph Biden,…[t]he Delaware Democrat was one of seventeen Senators who voted in 1974 to ban all covert operations, and proudly noted during his 1988 campaign for president that he had threatened to “go public” with covert action plans by the Reagan administration, causing them to cancel the operations.


The sad reality is that a CIA operative with any hope of infiltrating a terrorist cell would need to demonstrate his bona fides in any number of reprehensible ways. These are unpleasant thoughts to contemplate, and they certainly do not fit our conception of the way the world ought to work. But America cannot have it both ways -- it cannot expect to deter an Osama bin Laden and keep its hands clean at the same time. Presidents need options short of war to handle this type of threat.


Congressional meddling is primarily responsible for this new CIA ethos, transforming it from an agency willing to take risks, and act at times in a Machiavellian manner, into just another sclerotic Washington bureaucracy. This cautious, legalistic attitude has crippled the agency’s effectiveness and will not change unless the oversight committees of Congress acknowledge the uniquely executive character of intelligence and covert operations, and start to dismantle the cumbersome oversight apparatus erected during the last twenty five years."
Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA | History News Network


" Here at home, the Obama administration has gravely impaired our capability to gather human intelligence by declassifying hundreds of pages of documents that explain our interrogation techniques—information that is now probably in al-Qaeda training manuals."
404 Not Found