It spreads: 5 more senators down after gun vote

TruthOut10

Active Member
Dec 3, 2012
627
100
28
Senators in several states who voted earlier this month against increasing background checks for gun buyers have since seen their approval ratings noticeably drop, according to new polls released Monday by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski's (R-Alaska) net approval rating dropped 16 points, as she shed much of her previous cross-party appeal. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) saw his numbers dive 18 points, from a positive to a negative rating.

Not all of the change can be attributed to the vote. Portman, for instance, saw his approval drop among Republicans when he announced his support for gay marriage in March. But in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada and Ohio, at least 60 percent of voters supported background checks, and many expressed disappointment with politicians who voted otherwise.

Senators Lose Support After Opposing Gun Background Checks, Poll Shows
 
Senators in several states who voted earlier this month against increasing background checks for gun buyers have since seen their approval ratings noticeably drop, according to new polls released Monday by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski's (R-Alaska) net approval rating dropped 16 points, as she shed much of her previous cross-party appeal. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) saw his numbers dive 18 points, from a positive to a negative rating.

Not all of the change can be attributed to the vote. Portman, for instance, saw his approval drop among Republicans when he announced his support for gay marriage in March. But in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada and Ohio, at least 60 percent of voters supported background checks, and many expressed disappointment with politicians who voted otherwise.

Senators Lose Support After Opposing Gun Background Checks, Poll Shows

That will last about one month. That's the problem with this issue for liberals. It wasn't close enough to an election to matter.

Live by demagogy.

Die by demagogy.
 
Senators in several states who voted earlier this month against increasing background checks for gun buyers have since seen their approval ratings noticeably drop, according to new polls released Monday by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski's (R-Alaska) net approval rating dropped 16 points, as she shed much of her previous cross-party appeal. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) saw his numbers dive 18 points, from a positive to a negative rating.

Not all of the change can be attributed to the vote. Portman, for instance, saw his approval drop among Republicans when he announced his support for gay marriage in March. But in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada and Ohio, at least 60 percent of voters supported background checks, and many expressed disappointment with politicians who voted otherwise.

Senators Lose Support After Opposing Gun Background Checks, Poll Shows
I've debunked the one about the New Hamshire senator dropping in the polls do you want me to debunk this one also using the same standards?
 
Senators in several states who voted earlier this month against increasing background checks for gun buyers have since seen their approval ratings noticeably drop, according to new polls released Monday by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski's (R-Alaska) net approval rating dropped 16 points, as she shed much of her previous cross-party appeal. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) saw his numbers dive 18 points, from a positive to a negative rating.

Not all of the change can be attributed to the vote. Portman, for instance, saw his approval drop among Republicans when he announced his support for gay marriage in March. But in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada and Ohio, at least 60 percent of voters supported background checks, and many expressed disappointment with politicians who voted otherwise.

Senators Lose Support After Opposing Gun Background Checks, Poll Shows

That will last about one month. That's the problem with this issue for liberals. It wasn't close enough to an election to matter.

Live by demagogy.

Die by demagogy.

Kind of hard to debunk when a lot of Republican voters want background checks too. That's the part I find interesting, you believe it's all Democrats who want gun control
 
Senators in several states who voted earlier this month against increasing background checks for gun buyers have since seen their approval ratings noticeably drop, according to new polls released Monday by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski's (R-Alaska) net approval rating dropped 16 points, as she shed much of her previous cross-party appeal. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) saw his numbers dive 18 points, from a positive to a negative rating.

Not all of the change can be attributed to the vote. Portman, for instance, saw his approval drop among Republicans when he announced his support for gay marriage in March. But in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada and Ohio, at least 60 percent of voters supported background checks, and many expressed disappointment with politicians who voted otherwise.

Senators Lose Support After Opposing Gun Background Checks, Poll Shows

That will last about one month. That's the problem with this issue for liberals. It wasn't close enough to an election to matter.

Live by demagogy.

Die by demagogy.

The voters sure remembered all the BS the GOP and especially the teabaggers had been pulling for years on election day last year,...Expect another GOP spanking in 2014 :clap2:
 
Senators in several states who voted earlier this month against increasing background checks for gun buyers have since seen their approval ratings noticeably drop, according to new polls released Monday by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski's (R-Alaska) net approval rating dropped 16 points, as she shed much of her previous cross-party appeal. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) saw his numbers dive 18 points, from a positive to a negative rating.

Not all of the change can be attributed to the vote. Portman, for instance, saw his approval drop among Republicans when he announced his support for gay marriage in March. But in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada and Ohio, at least 60 percent of voters supported background checks, and many expressed disappointment with politicians who voted otherwise.

Senators Lose Support After Opposing Gun Background Checks, Poll Shows

That will last about one month. That's the problem with this issue for liberals. It wasn't close enough to an election to matter.

Live by demagogy.

Die by demagogy.

Kind of hard to debunk when a lot of Republican voters want background checks too. That's the part I find interesting, you believe it's all Democrats who want gun control

:cuckoo::eusa_whistle:
 
Senators in several states who voted earlier this month against increasing background checks for gun buyers have since seen their approval ratings noticeably drop, according to new polls released Monday by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski's (R-Alaska) net approval rating dropped 16 points, as she shed much of her previous cross-party appeal. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) saw his numbers dive 18 points, from a positive to a negative rating.

Not all of the change can be attributed to the vote. Portman, for instance, saw his approval drop among Republicans when he announced his support for gay marriage in March. But in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada and Ohio, at least 60 percent of voters supported background checks, and many expressed disappointment with politicians who voted otherwise.

Senators Lose Support After Opposing Gun Background Checks, Poll Shows

That will last about one month. That's the problem with this issue for liberals. It wasn't close enough to an election to matter.

Live by demagogy.

Die by demagogy.

The voters sure remembered all the BS the GOP and especially the teabaggers had been pulling for years on election day last year,...Expect another GOP spanking in 2014 :clap2:
on file.
 
And Gabby Gifford is waiting with millions in a Super Pac. This is the first time the NRA has been stared down after they have paid their Hacks on Congress to vote gun restrictions down. I would say that a majority of the Senators who voted No will be very nervous as 2014 approaches...including Reid.
 
It's fun watching Democrats when they're pissed off at other Democrats.
 
And Gabby Gifford is waiting with millions in a Super Pac. This is the first time the NRA has been stared down after they have paid their Hacks on Congress to vote gun restrictions down. I would say that a majority of the Senators who voted No will be very nervous as 2014 approaches...including Reid.

Do you know how it feels to be tarred and feathered? Lucky you aren't living during the founders days. Your ass would be blistered.
 
And Gabby Gifford is waiting with millions in a Super Pac. This is the first time the NRA has been stared down after they have paid their Hacks on Congress to vote gun restrictions down. I would say that a majority of the Senators who voted No will be very nervous as 2014 approaches...including Reid.

Do you know how it feels to be tarred and feathered? Lucky you aren't living during the founders days. Your ass would be blistered.

I am against gun control in most forms, but after reading enough of your posts I believe there should at least be mental health screenings required before you can own a firearm.
 
And Gabby Gifford is waiting with millions in a Super Pac. This is the first time the NRA has been stared down after they have paid their Hacks on Congress to vote gun restrictions down. I would say that a majority of the Senators who voted No will be very nervous as 2014 approaches...including Reid.

Do you know how it feels to be tarred and feathered? Lucky you aren't living during the founders days. Your ass would be blistered.

I am against gun control in most forms, but after reading enough of your posts I believe there should at least be mental health screenings required before you can own a firearm.

Sure you're against the constitution. The founders would tar and feather your ass also.
 
The Senators that voted down the proposal about "background-checks," noted that sandwiched within the proposal, was still the banning of assault-style weapons, which was the original proposal made and that is why they turned it down. If the proposal focused only on increasing background checks to include gun shows or those with diagnosed dangerous mental-illnesses, it would have most likely been passed. I see no problem with background checks, if the reasons for denial of ownership is strictly limited to violent offenders and those people with diagnosed mental-illnesses that may likely lead to the threatening of others.
 
The Senators that voted down the proposal about "background-checks," noted that sandwiched within the proposal, was still the banning of assault-style weapons, which was the original proposal made and that is why they turned it down. If the proposal focused only on increasing background checks to include gun shows or those with diagnosed dangerous mental-illnesses, it would have most likely been passed. I see no problem with background checks, if the reasons for denial of ownership is strictly limited to violent offenders and those people with diagnosed mental-illnesses that may likely lead to the threatening of others.

They do background checks at gun shows.
 

Forum List

Back
Top