It is Time for President Trump to Declare a Four-Year Moratorium on Responding to, or Acknowledging Politically Motivated Lawsuits

[westwall]

Explain why he loses.

He hasn't lost, dumbass.

 

[Crepitus]

It's time for President Trump to declare a four-year moratorium on the White House or the Justice Department responding or even acknowledging these kind of lawsuits.

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/18/nx-s1-5332274/judge-ruling-usaid-shutdown

The Trump administration likely violated the Constitution when it effectively shuttered the U.S. Agency for International Development, a federal judge has ruled.

In a 68-page opinion Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Theodore Chuang, an Obama appointee, wrote that "the Court finds that Defendants' actions taken to shut down USAID on an accelerated basis, including its apparent decision to permanently close USAID headquarters without the approval of a duly appointed USAID Officer, likely violated the United States Constitution in multiple ways, and that these actions harmed not only Plaintiffs, but also the public interest, because they deprived the public's elected representatives in Congress of their constitutional authority to decide whether, when, and how to close down an agency created by Congress."
First of all Congress has spoken on the topic of USAID many times. Just a random sample of their findings:

WASHINGTON—The Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) held a hearing today titled “America Last: How Foreign Aid Undermined U.S. Interests Around the World” to expose egregious foreign aid spending, review proposed reforms, and aid the Trump Administration’s efforts to implement America-first foreign aid policies. Members of the Subcommittee presented an overwhelming array of examples illustrating how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has spent taxpayer dollars on programs that undermine American interests. Expert witnesses slammed the Biden Administration for blindly doling out money and not conducting proper oversight of tax dollars. The Subcommittee will continue to investigate this waste, fraud, and abuse while aiding the Trump Administration’s effort to reevaluate and realign U.S. foreign aid with America-first interests.

More importantly, ain't nobody got time to respond to hundreds, soon to be thousands, of separate lawsuits over every action that Donald Trump takes after being elected to shrink the waste, fraud, and abuse in government.

No.

Some lawyer(s) claiming to represent "unnamed aid workers" are not granted the power under our Constitution to stop the president in his tracks and force him to wait to protect the nation from financial disaster and from violent illegal aliens until the cases wend their way through the courts, whose dockets are already crowded with other frivilous lawsuits brought largely by trial lawyers who are heavy donors to the Democratic Party and their causes.

Nor should they have the power to induce the president to pause his work to respond to each and every one of them. This is a very old legal trick in the United States, to overwhelm the adversary and force them to respond to filing after filing. It's a trick done by lawyers who know that they ultimately have a losing case.

An obscure judge, installed by the political opposition, should not and does not have he power to force the executive to cancel actions because he mouths the catch phrase now in vogue: "likely unconstitutional." They should at least have the guts to say which part of the USC Trump's actions violate and how.

From now on, such lawsuits should not even be responded to in court, until a lower court actually tries to enforce such nonsense. If that happens, the DOJ should immediately file a case with the USSC. If the USSC declines to hear the case, then they can continue to ignore the ruling.

Trump, and other White House officials should take a lesson from Hakeem Jeffries and answer any questions about the latest bullshit filing with "next question."

Trump has humored the last gasp of the lawfare long enough. Time to fully focus on the business of the American people.

Who decides what is politically motivated?

IMHO the whole DOGE thing is politically motivated and shouldn't be happening.

Neither should the whole immigration insanity.

And lets not even get started on the DEI thing.

See how that works, kid?

 

[westwall]

Pull a Lincoln, just suspend Habis Corpus.....We have been invaded and dems are in rebellion.

Not a terrible idea. Not a good option either, but not terrible.

 

[Rawley]

Trump is getting his ass handed to him by the courts. Have you figured out why?

Yup, you haven't? Really?

 

[Crepitus]

Could you imagine fighting WWII today?

With tRump in charge we'd be part of the Axis.

 

[Crepitus]

Trump is getting his ass handed to him by the courts. Have you figured out why?

No, they have not.

They won't any time soon either.

 

[Crepitus]

Yup, you haven't? Really?

okfine See?

 

[Crepitus]

It's actually time for Roberts and the SC to assert their constitutional authority over the lower courts.

Robers just rebuked tRump for his ranting against them.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Anyone remember watching the Senate hearings for Biden and Obama-appointed judges? I'm a nerd for watching those things. It was pretty shocking how radical the beliefs of many of them were, and how they squirmed and obfuscated when questioned about them by Republicans only to be confirmed on party line votes by the Democrats. The only appointee that I remember failing to be confirmed was this lawyer who forced a rape victim to be named publicly.

This is judge Loren Alikhan. AliKhan was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by President Joe Biden in December 2023.

AliKhan blocked the Trump administration's sweeping plan to pause federal funding while it reviewed whether programs aligned with his agenda, minutes before it was scheduled to take effect on January 28, after a group of nonprofit and public health organizations filed a lawsuit. She extended the order last week, ruling that the federal government must tell agencies not to implement the freeze.

She has a long history of advocating as an attorney against religious liberty. Here she refuses to answer questions about that, at her hearing. A hearing at which, she was ultimately confirmed by hyper-partisan Democrats.

 

[Crepitus]

OMG.

They would argue that bombing Pearl was not an "invasion," and declare the war illegal.

Except the part about saving Stalin from Hitler, which they would have given a court order to the Senate to declare war as soon as that started.

Pearl Harbor wouldn't even have happened, we'd be on their side.

 

[Rawley]

Who decides what is politically motivated?

IMHO the whole DOGE thing is politically motivated and shouldn't be happening.

Neither should the whole immigration insanity.

And lets not even get started on the DEI thing.

See how that works, kid?

Gotta give you and your cult credit - taking the side of fraud, waste and abuse, criminal illegal aliens, racial discrimination and boys on girls teams.

Most people would care about handing the opposition the House , Senate and WH for a generation, but not your cult. Kudos

 

[Rawley]

okfine See?

says the blind man

 

[Seymour Flops]

I've asked this before:

What say you, Democrats? If deporting a plane load of Tren de Aragua prevents even one American from being murdered, or one immigrant child from being gang-raped and trafficked is it worth it?

okfine?

Crepitus?

IM2?

 

[Crepitus]

Every single one of them a hand picked leftist judge.

Because the republican ones are terrified of the fat orange fuck?

Or is it just that Democrats are picking judges that actually want to do their jobs whether than re-enforce anyone's agenda?

 

[Crepitus]

a plane load of Tren de Aragua

Now prove that's what they were.

 

[Crepitus]

Because there are highly partisan judges on the bench.

Ayup, those are the ones that won't face tRump.

 

[Crepitus]

Every one of his EO's is based on a law passed by congress.

Well that's a lie.

Why do you do that so often?

 

[Crepitus]

And they are not even making rulings. They are issuing Restraining orders at a rate never seen prior to this.

No merits, no actual ability to counter any argument made by the plaintiff.

Becuase tRump is trying to flood the zone with his bullshit to make it harder for anyone to keep up with it.

 

[Crepitus]

wants to be liked by Democrats.

What planet are you from?

 

[Crepitus]

Pull a Lincoln, just suspend Habis Corpus.....We have been invaded and dems are in rebellion.

I knew it wouldn't be too long before some whack-job suggested that.