It is Not Over

[Skylar]

the courts won’t hear the evidence

The courts heard the evidence and it was laughed out of court, even by trump appointed Judges.
And in some cases, Rudy said he had evidence, but couldn't show it.

But sure, keep up the BIG LIE and keep lying about the election being stolen and the judged denying evidence.

No evidence was heard.

that's right. the bullshit that was provided by trump's legal crack hos, err, "team" was heard, but not considered "evidence" of anything. it is known that you all have trouble with the meaning of the word "evidence". the judges however know what this word means.

Trump had a trial date, where he was free to present witnesses under oath, present his evidence, get the 'case on its merits' he always wanted.

And a day before the trial was to start, Trump's team voluntarily dismissed their OWN case..just before they had to back up their claims with people under oath.

“Rather than presenting their evidence and witnesses to a court and to cross-examination under oath, the Trump campaign wisely decided the smartest course was to dismiss their frivolous cases,” Raffensperger said

They even lied about WHY they dropped their own case, insisting it was because there was a 'settlement agreement'. There was no such agreement. Trump's team just ran from the very day in court they said they wanted.

And yet these poor, foolish rubes keep repeating the same blithering nonsense that Trump 'never had a chance to present evidence'. He did. He refused to.

Shocker.

 

[Lastamender]

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active - And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT Has Allowed Evidence to be Argued | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history. The tremendously popular incumbent candidate, President Trump, was easily winning the race on election night in a landslide and then suddenly multiple states took a break, quit counting, and by the end of the week...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

• There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
• In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
• In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
• In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
• In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
• In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
• 30 cases remain active

Saying there was no fraud is not doing any good. People are going to fight until the evidence is heard.


And now we know the courts didn’t allow a single instance of evidence of fraud to be presented to date.
Americans are livid with the actions that took place in the 2020 election and believe the election was stolen. There are numerous reasons for this.

How'd the cases turn out?

I can tell ya how...

Day #142 of the 58th presidential term for the United States of America and Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. is still president.

Illegitimate president.

Says you, a delusional Internet dweller.

History and reality states otherwise.

Presidents | The White House

Learn more about the Presidents of the United States from WhiteHouse.gov.

www.whitehouse.gov

Guess which one matters?

History does not help your argument.

Federalist: 5 Ways Biden Unusually Outperformed Norms

Journalists are strangely lacking curiosity about some mysterious ways Democrat Joe Biden pulled off some "electoral jujitsu" in this presidential election, according to The Federalist's J.B. Shurk.

www.newsmax.com

Can you show us any presidential election that was 'overturned' after the president was sworn in? Its been at least 225 years, so you'll have plenty of time to draw on.

Nothing? Not one example of your hysteric dipshittery?

History is not your friend, tinfoil.

There is an example of a commission set up to investigate fraud in a presidential election in the late 1800's. Congress knowing 40% of voters wanted an investigation into fraud did nothing. Cruz offered them to chance and they yelled traitor knowing damn well there was massive fraud.

So history is on my side. The Congress proved they were complicit with the fraud Jan. 6th by not forming that commission which would have consisted of 5 Democrats, five Republicans and five Supreme court justices. It was not done because Congress knew fraud would have been proven easily. They needed more time to cover it up. That is a fact.

 

[Skylar]

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active - And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT Has Allowed Evidence to be Argued | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history. The tremendously popular incumbent candidate, President Trump, was easily winning the race on election night in a landslide and then suddenly multiple states took a break, quit counting, and by the end of the week...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

• There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
• In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
• In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
• In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
• In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
• In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
• 30 cases remain active

Saying there was no fraud is not doing any good. People are going to fight until the evidence is heard.


And now we know the courts didn’t allow a single instance of evidence of fraud to be presented to date.
Americans are livid with the actions that took place in the 2020 election and believe the election was stolen. There are numerous reasons for this.

Oh, and bullshit. In at least two, Trump was allowed to present evidence. In the first, Trump's team refused to submit the evidence to back their claims. In the second, his legal team dismissed their OWN case a day before their trial was to begin.

You've been played, rube.

At this point you know you're full of shit on the 'no evidence was ever allowed' nonsense. And we know you're full of shit. And you know we know you're full of shit.

So who is this theater for?

 

[Skylar]

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active - And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT Has Allowed Evidence to be Argued | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history. The tremendously popular incumbent candidate, President Trump, was easily winning the race on election night in a landslide and then suddenly multiple states took a break, quit counting, and by the end of the week...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

• There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
• In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
• In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
• In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
• In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
• In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
• 30 cases remain active

Saying there was no fraud is not doing any good. People are going to fight until the evidence is heard.


And now we know the courts didn’t allow a single instance of evidence of fraud to be presented to date.
Americans are livid with the actions that took place in the 2020 election and believe the election was stolen. There are numerous reasons for this.

How'd the cases turn out?

I can tell ya how...

Day #142 of the 58th presidential term for the United States of America and Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. is still president.

Illegitimate president.

Says you, a delusional Internet dweller.

History and reality states otherwise.

Presidents | The White House

Learn more about the Presidents of the United States from WhiteHouse.gov.

www.whitehouse.gov

Guess which one matters?

History does not help your argument.

Federalist: 5 Ways Biden Unusually Outperformed Norms

Journalists are strangely lacking curiosity about some mysterious ways Democrat Joe Biden pulled off some "electoral jujitsu" in this presidential election, according to The Federalist's J.B. Shurk.

www.newsmax.com

Can you show us any presidential election that was 'overturned' after the president was sworn in? Its been at least 225 years, so you'll have plenty of time to draw on.

Nothing? Not one example of your hysteric dipshittery?

History is not your friend, tinfoil.

There is an example of a commission set up to investigate fraud in a presidential election in the late 1800's. Congress knowing 40% of voters wanted an investigation into fraud did nothing. Cruz offered them to chance and they yelled traitor knowing damn well there was massive fraud.

So history is on my side. The Congress proved they were complicit with the fraud Jan. 6th by not forming that commission which would have consisted of 5 Democrats, five Republicans and five Supreme court justices. History is on my side dumbass.

And who was the president that was 'unseated' as a result of their 'investigation into fraud'?

Name him. Surely if history is on your side, naming this president will be a trivial matter. Here's a list of EVERY president in case you can't quite remember his name:

List of presidents of the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Still nothing? Shocker. You can't....as that president doesn't exist. You have literally ZERO examples of a sitting president 'unseated' and replaced by the guy he beat in the history of our nation.

Try again, rube. As history once again took a juicy deuce on your silly little narrative.

 

[Lastamender]

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active - And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT Has Allowed Evidence to be Argued | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history. The tremendously popular incumbent candidate, President Trump, was easily winning the race on election night in a landslide and then suddenly multiple states took a break, quit counting, and by the end of the week...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

• There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
• In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
• In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
• In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
• In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
• In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
• 30 cases remain active

Saying there was no fraud is not doing any good. People are going to fight until the evidence is heard.


And now we know the courts didn’t allow a single instance of evidence of fraud to be presented to date.
Americans are livid with the actions that took place in the 2020 election and believe the election was stolen. There are numerous reasons for this.

How'd the cases turn out?

I can tell ya how...

Day #142 of the 58th presidential term for the United States of America and Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. is still president.

Illegitimate president.

Says you, a delusional Internet dweller.

History and reality states otherwise.

Presidents | The White House

Learn more about the Presidents of the United States from WhiteHouse.gov.

www.whitehouse.gov

Guess which one matters?

History does not help your argument.

Federalist: 5 Ways Biden Unusually Outperformed Norms

Journalists are strangely lacking curiosity about some mysterious ways Democrat Joe Biden pulled off some "electoral jujitsu" in this presidential election, according to The Federalist's J.B. Shurk.

www.newsmax.com

Can you show us any presidential election that was 'overturned' after the president was sworn in? Its been at least 225 years, so you'll have plenty of time to draw on.

Nothing? Not one example of your hysteric dipshittery?

History is not your friend, tinfoil.

There is an example of a commission set up to investigate fraud in a presidential election in the late 1800's. Congress knowing 40% of voters wanted an investigation into fraud did nothing. Cruz offered them to chance and they yelled traitor knowing damn well there was massive fraud.

So history is on my side. The Congress proved they were complicit with the fraud Jan. 6th by not forming that commission which would have consisted of 5 Democrats, five Republicans and five Supreme court justices. History is on my side dumbass.

And who was the president that was 'unseated' as a result of their 'investigation into fraud'?

Name him. Surely if history is on your side, naming this president will be a trivial matter. Here's a list of EVERY president in case you can't quite remember his name:

List of presidents of the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Still nothing? Shocker. You can't....as that president doesn't exist. You have literally ZERO examples of a sitting president 'unseated' and replaced by the guy he beat in the history of our nation.

Try again, rube. As history once again took a juicy deuce on your silly little narrative.

Cruz cited a 145-year-old precedent for such a panel. The 1876 presidential race between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden was also marred by allegations of widespread fraud. A stymied Congress decided to appoint an electoral commission — with five House members, five senators and five Supreme Court justices — to investigate and resolve differences over the count.

Citing History, Sen. Cruz Wants A Panel To Probe Elections

But there are some crucial differences between the 1876 electoral controversy and today's election.

www.npr.org

This source is biased against Trump but there is the history and precedent. Why didn't Congress act on it? It would have only taken 10 days. There is no excuse for not doing it, except knowing it would prove fraud. Period.

 

[Skylar]

ed a 145-year-old precedent for such a panel. The 1876 presidential race between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden was also marred by allegations of widespread fraud. A stymied Congress decided to appoint an electoral co

Once again, name the president that was unseated and replaced by the guy he beat by such a 'panel'.

Ever.

If history is on your side, this should be a trivial matter. If history is laughing at your silly little fantasy like we are......this will be starkly more difficult.

Try again, Rube.

 

[Lastamender]

ed a 145-year-old precedent for such a panel. The 1876 presidential race between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden was also marred by allegations of widespread fraud. A stymied Congress decided to appoint an electoral co

Once again, name the president that was unseated and replaced by the guy he beat by such a 'panel'.

Ever.

If history is on your side, this should be a trivial matter. If history is laughing at your silly little fantasy like we are......this will be starkly more difficult.

Try again, Rube.

The investigation, not the results, is what is important you disingenuous bag of shit.

 

[Skylar]

ed a 145-year-old precedent for such a panel. The 1876 presidential race between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden was also marred by allegations of widespread fraud. A stymied Congress decided to appoint an electoral co

Once again, name the president that was unseated and replaced by the guy he beat by such a 'panel'.

Ever.

If history is on your side, this should be a trivial matter. If history is laughing at your silly little fantasy like we are......this will be starkly more difficult.

Try again, Rube.

The investigation, not the results, is what is important you disingenuous bag of shit.

So that would be no president ever that has been 'unseated' by such a panel. In our nation's history.

Thank you for finally admitting the absurdity of your entire argument.

 

[Lastamender]

ed a 145-year-old precedent for such a panel. The 1876 presidential race between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden was also marred by allegations of widespread fraud. A stymied Congress decided to appoint an electoral co

Once again, name the president that was unseated and replaced by the guy he beat by such a 'panel'.

Ever.

If history is on your side, this should be a trivial matter. If history is laughing at your silly little fantasy like we are......this will be starkly more difficult.

Try again, Rube.

The investigation, not the results, is what is important you disingenuous bag of shit.

So that would be no president ever.

Thank you for finally admitting the absurdity of your entire argument.

The absurdity is coming from you. Congress was complicit in the fraud and you are as dumb as a rock to think anything different.

 

[Skylar]

This source is biased against Trump but there is the history and precedent. Why didn't Congress act on it? It would have only taken 10 days. There is no excuse for not doing it, except knowing it would prove fraud. Period.

The Flat Earthers, Truthers and Birthers say the exact same thing: that the refusal to disprove their imagination means that they must be right.

Good luck with that.

 

[Skylar]

ed a 145-year-old precedent for such a panel. The 1876 presidential race between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden was also marred by allegations of widespread fraud. A stymied Congress decided to appoint an electoral co

Once again, name the president that was unseated and replaced by the guy he beat by such a 'panel'.

Ever.

If history is on your side, this should be a trivial matter. If history is laughing at your silly little fantasy like we are......this will be starkly more difficult.

Try again, Rube.

The investigation, not the results, is what is important you disingenuous bag of shit.

So that would be no president ever.

Thank you for finally admitting the absurdity of your entire argument.

The absurdity is coming from you. Congress was complicit in the fraud and you are as dumb as a rock to think anything different.

There being a President Biden says otherwise. Biden won the election. Its you that has to prove otherwise. Your insistence that WE have to disprove whatever hapless batshit you invent is the same generic conspiracy faire used by every Moon Landing hoaxer, 911 Truther and Flat Earther.

Remember, Trump had his chance to present evidence in court, twice. He refused both times.

You've been played, Rube.

 

[Lastamender]

This source is biased against Trump but there is the history and precedent. Why didn't Congress act on it? It would have only taken 10 days. There is no excuse for not doing it, except knowing it would prove fraud. Period.

The Flat Earthers, Truthers and Birthers say the exact same thing: that the refusal to disprove their imagination means that they must be right.

Good luck with that.

The AZ audit will be done soon. The GA. audit will start soon. Over 13 states want forensic audits now. Go bother them you stupid dishonest fuck.

 

[Skylar]

This source is biased against Trump but there is the history and precedent. Why didn't Congress act on it? It would have only taken 10 days. There is no excuse for not doing it, except knowing it would prove fraud. Period.

The Flat Earthers, Truthers and Birthers say the exact same thing: that the refusal to disprove their imagination means that they must be right.

Good luck with that.

The AZ audit will be done soon.

And no one save your ilk will give a shit because it was done by Cyber Ninjas......a group that has zero experience in recounts, have no idea what they're doing, wildly violated chain of custody so completely that the voting machines in question can never be used again, were caught using pens around the ballots that can alter votes, is largely being conducted WITHOUT outside observers, using a process is was secret until a judge ordered them to share it, lead by a guy promoting election conspiracies BEFORE the recount even began.

The Maricopa County election board (which does have experience and is Republican lead) already did an forensic audit and found no irregularities.

Yet Rubes like yourself won't accept any result that doesn't affirm your fantasy that the election was stolen.

The election is over, my friend. You lost.

 

[Lastamender]

This source is biased against Trump but there is the history and precedent. Why didn't Congress act on it? It would have only taken 10 days. There is no excuse for not doing it, except knowing it would prove fraud. Period.

The Flat Earthers, Truthers and Birthers say the exact same thing: that the refusal to disprove their imagination means that they must be right.

Good luck with that.

The AZ audit will be done soon.

And no one save your ilk will give a shit because it was done by Cyber Ninjas......a group that has zero experience in recounts, have no idea what they're doing, wildly violated chain of custody so completely that the voting machines in question can never be used again, were caught using pens around the ballots that can alter votes, is largely being conducted WITHOUT outside observers, using a process is was secret until a judge ordered them to share it, lead by a guy promoting election conspiracies BEFORE the recount even began.

The Maricopa County election board (which does have experience and is Republican lead) already did an forensic audit and found no irregularities.

Yet Rubes like yourself won't accept any result that doesn't affirm your fantasy that the election was stolen.

The election is over, my friend. You lost.

I am not your friend, and Maricopa is so corrupt they can't discredit anyone or anything.

And those audits you speak of, Maricopa County officials said Dominion was on site when they took place. In short, those audits mean 0.

 

[Skylar]

This source is biased against Trump but there is the history and precedent. Why didn't Congress act on it? It would have only taken 10 days. There is no excuse for not doing it, except knowing it would prove fraud. Period.

The Flat Earthers, Truthers and Birthers say the exact same thing: that the refusal to disprove their imagination means that they must be right.

Good luck with that.

The AZ audit will be done soon.

And no one save your ilk will give a shit because it was done by Cyber Ninjas......a group that has zero experience in recounts, have no idea what they're doing, wildly violated chain of custody so completely that the voting machines in question can never be used again, were caught using pens around the ballots that can alter votes, is largely being conducted WITHOUT outside observers, using a process is was secret until a judge ordered them to share it, lead by a guy promoting election conspiracies BEFORE the recount even began.

The Maricopa County election board (which does have experience and is Republican lead) already did an forensic audit and found no irregularities.

Yet Rubes like yourself won't accept any result that doesn't affirm your fantasy that the election was stolen.

The election is over, my friend. You lost.

I am not your friend, and Maricopa is so corrupt they can't discredit anyone or anything.

Thank you for demonstrating my point exactly: any result that you don't like is 'corrupt'. Regardless of the actual evidence.

The forensic audit that you demanded was already conducted. By a republican lead election board, no less. You just ignored it because you didn't like the results.

Good luck with that.

 

[Lastamender]

This source is biased against Trump but there is the history and precedent. Why didn't Congress act on it? It would have only taken 10 days. There is no excuse for not doing it, except knowing it would prove fraud. Period.

The Flat Earthers, Truthers and Birthers say the exact same thing: that the refusal to disprove their imagination means that they must be right.

Good luck with that.

The AZ audit will be done soon.

And no one save your ilk will give a shit because it was done by Cyber Ninjas......a group that has zero experience in recounts, have no idea what they're doing, wildly violated chain of custody so completely that the voting machines in question can never be used again, were caught using pens around the ballots that can alter votes, is largely being conducted WITHOUT outside observers, using a process is was secret until a judge ordered them to share it, lead by a guy promoting election conspiracies BEFORE the recount even began.

The Maricopa County election board (which does have experience and is Republican lead) already did an forensic audit and found no irregularities.

Yet Rubes like yourself won't accept any result that doesn't affirm your fantasy that the election was stolen.

The election is over, my friend. You lost.

I am not your friend, and Maricopa is so corrupt they can't discredit anyone or anything.

Thank you for demonstrating my point exactly: any result that you don't like is 'corrupt'. Regardless of the actual evidence.

The forensic audit that you demanded was already conducted. By a republican lead election board, no less. You just ignored it because you didn't like the results.

Good luck with that.

Any audit with Dominion present cannot be trusted. A severe conflict of interest that if situations were reversed would never be acceptable, cretin.

 

[Skylar]

This source is biased against Trump but there is the history and precedent. Why didn't Congress act on it? It would have only taken 10 days. There is no excuse for not doing it, except knowing it would prove fraud. Period.

The Flat Earthers, Truthers and Birthers say the exact same thing: that the refusal to disprove their imagination means that they must be right.

Good luck with that.

The AZ audit will be done soon.

And no one save your ilk will give a shit because it was done by Cyber Ninjas......a group that has zero experience in recounts, have no idea what they're doing, wildly violated chain of custody so completely that the voting machines in question can never be used again, were caught using pens around the ballots that can alter votes, is largely being conducted WITHOUT outside observers, using a process is was secret until a judge ordered them to share it, lead by a guy promoting election conspiracies BEFORE the recount even began.

The Maricopa County election board (which does have experience and is Republican lead) already did an forensic audit and found no irregularities.

Yet Rubes like yourself won't accept any result that doesn't affirm your fantasy that the election was stolen.

The election is over, my friend. You lost.

I am not your friend, and Maricopa is so corrupt they can't discredit anyone or anything.

Thank you for demonstrating my point exactly: any result that you don't like is 'corrupt'. Regardless of the actual evidence.

The forensic audit that you demanded was already conducted. By a republican lead election board, no less. You just ignored it because you didn't like the results.

Good luck with that.

Any audit with Dominion present cannot be trusted. A severe conflict of interest that if situations were reversed would never be acceptable, cretin.

Says you, citing you. You base a conspiracy on another conspiracy on another conspiracy.

Just like every Truther, flat earther and birther ever. Ignoring any result that doesn't ape their conspiracy.

Just like you've ignored every count, every recount, every hand count, every forensic audit, every official tally, every certified result, every electoral count, the outcome of every court case on the topic. If it doesn't ape your fantasy, you insist its fake.

Republican, Democrat, Trump appointee, Obama appointee, trial judge, federal judge, Supreme Court, election board (republican led or otherwise), secretary of state, or election manager......per you, they're all 'fake' if they don't ape your fantasy.

Its why neither you, the 911 Truthers, the Birthers nor the Big Liars are taken seriously by anyone outside their respective little bubbles.

 

[toobfreak]

Saying there was no fraud is not doing any good.

History shows that there is ALWAYS some fraud and cheating in every election. Election fraud is as old as voting itself, so when the Left adamantly declares this election FREE OF FRAUD, all claims baseless and DEBUNKED, yet can't tell us how, when or WHO debunked it all much less share with us the proof of it, then get lame-asses here trying to argue that they "don't have to show or prove" the very action they have alleged 10,000 times, that all of the claims have been disproven, then further lie that the courts fairly heard and disproved and dismissed all these cases ON A BASIS OF LACK OF EVIDENCE, it becomes clear that the cheating in this election went far and wide beyond any election ever in our history!

In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented.

30 cases remain active.

The state legislatures certified their results with millions of ballots in question.

The US Congress accepted these certified results which ignored the thousands of instances of election fraud.

VP Mike Pence accepted the results despite state legislatures asking him to examine the results.

And now, when 500 patriots protest at the Capitol, the Leftwing hoodlums are trying to make it an issue about Trump rather than the election itself?

WHAT IS THE LEFT HIDING & SO AFRAID OF???

 

[Skylar]

Saying there was no fraud is not doing any good.

History shows that there is ALWAYS some fraud and cheating in every election.

There's always some fraud in any election.

A Pennsylvania man pleaded guilty to voter fraud charges after he illegally cast a ballot for former President Trump using his dead mother’s name during the 2020 presidential election....

....I was isolated last year in lockdown,” Bartman told the judge. “I listened to too much propaganda and made a stupid mistake.”

Trump supporter admits to voter fraud after casting dead mother’s ballot in 2020

A Pennsylvania man pleaded guilty to voter fraud charges after he illegally cast a ballot for former President Trump using his dead mother’s name during the 2020 presidential election. Bruce B…

thehill.com

Just nothing significant that would change the outcome of the election.

“to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

William Barr

Which pretty much sums up the election.

 

[Lastamender]

Saying there was no fraud is not doing any good.

History shows that there is ALWAYS some fraud and cheating in every election.

There's always some fraud in any election.

A Pennsylvania man pleaded guilty to voter fraud charges after he illegally cast a ballot for former President Trump using his dead mother’s name during the 2020 presidential election....

....I was isolated last year in lockdown,” Bartman told the judge. “I listened to too much propaganda and made a stupid mistake.”

Trump supporter admits to voter fraud after casting dead mother’s ballot in 2020

A Pennsylvania man pleaded guilty to voter fraud charges after he illegally cast a ballot for former President Trump using his dead mother’s name during the 2020 presidential election. Bruce B…

thehill.com

Just nothing significant that would change the outcome of the election.

“to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

William Barr

Which pretty much sums up the election.

200,000 missing votes won't change an election? 30, 000 counterfeit ballots won't change an election decided by 10,000? Think again stupid.