Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I just don’t understand how anyone can call this an attack on pals. I don’t think any of the posters here are stupid enough to believe that, therefore it’s deliberate lying. Why they bother when anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see exactly what has happened here, with Hamas again using people and their deaths for propaganda purposes, is also beyond me <sigh>Indeed, but Israel's attacks on the Palestinians continue.Technically, the Arab Palestine did not exist in the sense of a competent government. Therefore, technically, they cannot be considered defeated.
What we're seeing is precisely the opposite of your ill-informed banter.
It is Arabs-Moslems who are instigating hostilities. Does the prayer leader at your madrassah write the nonsense you cut and paste?
Israel has a long history in shooting at unarmed farmers. There is no reason to believe that Israel is not doing it again.It is Arabs-Moslems who are instigating hostilities.
And the Palestinian who was shot BEFORE the march whilst working on his land?
Ah, the IDF didn't like the way he was digging I guess!
Whilst you have personal knowledge of the facts surrounding that event, please share those facts.
Interesting because in the 1949 armistice agreements with Egypt and Jordan (that Israel signed) the UN called the Negev Palestine. When did that change so that Israel could claim borders on that land?There are three sets of documents that contain the Internationally recognized boundary. You may choose to ignore them, but each is on file with the UN.
Egypt-Israel peace treaty (26 March 1979)
The Jordan-Israeli Peace Treaty (1994)
Israel has a long history in shooting at unarmed farmers. There is no reason to believe that Israel is not doing it again.It is Arabs-Moslems who are instigating hostilities.
And the Palestinian who was shot BEFORE the march whilst working on his land?
Ah, the IDF didn't like the way he was digging I guess!
Whilst you have personal knowledge of the facts surrounding that event, please share those facts.
israel shoots farmer - Google SearchIsrael has a long history in shooting at unarmed farmers. There is no reason to believe that Israel is not doing it again.It is Arabs-Moslems who are instigating hostilities.
And the Palestinian who was shot BEFORE the march whilst working on his land?
Ah, the IDF didn't like the way he was digging I guess!
Whilst you have personal knowledge of the facts surrounding that event, please share those facts.
I understand your long history of Jew hatreds which is why your unsupported claims are not taken seriously.
israel shoots farmer - Google SearchIsrael has a long history in shooting at unarmed farmers. There is no reason to believe that Israel is not doing it again.It is Arabs-Moslems who are instigating hostilities.
And the Palestinian who was shot BEFORE the march whilst working on his land?
Ah, the IDF didn't like the way he was digging I guess!
Whilst you have personal knowledge of the facts surrounding that event, please share those facts.
I understand your long history of Jew hatreds which is why your unsupported claims are not taken seriously.
Israel has a long history in shooting at unarmed farmers. There is no reason to believe that Israel is not doing it again.
(COMMENT)Uhhhh, there was no Israel in 1923.“the international boundary between Israel and Lebanon was established pursuant to the 1923 Agreement between France and Great Britain ...”,
The UN used a green line in 1949 and a blue line in 2000 because Israel has no border there.Yes, in 1923, there was no Israel as an active government; that is stating the obvious. BUT in the 21st Century, the UN and Lebanon (as well as other) have agreed to maintain the boundary as stipulated.
The UN used a green line in 1949 and a blue line in 2000 because Israel has no border there.Yes, in 1923, there was no Israel as an active government; that is stating the obvious. BUT in the 21st Century, the UN and Lebanon (as well as other) have agreed to maintain the boundary as stipulated.
Can you provide proof for what you say or are you just blowing smoke out your ass again?The UN used a green line in 1949 and a blue line in 2000 because Israel has no border there.Yes, in 1923, there was no Israel as an active government; that is stating the obvious. BUT in the 21st Century, the UN and Lebanon (as well as other) have agreed to maintain the boundary as stipulated.
Oh, come on, Tinmore. If there is no border between Lebanon and Israel then there is no border between Lebanon and Palestine. What argument do you always use when discussing the borders of "Palestine"?
Can you provide proof for what you say or are you just blowing smoke out your ass again?The UN used a green line in 1949 and a blue line in 2000 because Israel has no border there.Yes, in 1923, there was no Israel as an active government; that is stating the obvious. BUT in the 21st Century, the UN and Lebanon (as well as other) have agreed to maintain the boundary as stipulated.
Oh, come on, Tinmore. If there is no border between Lebanon and Israel then there is no border between Lebanon and Palestine. What argument do you always use when discussing the borders of "Palestine"?
You mean God, the creator and sustainer of existence, asking a 100+ year old Avraham to offer his healthy 37 year old son as a sacrifice and his 37 year old son, who believes in God and is a prophet, goes along with God’s request?We could start with the appalling story of Abraham willing to sacrifice his son to please "god".Which innocent?I would be happy to engage you in debate over whether the sacrifice of an innocent played a role in the development of Judaic law, but you are not an honest debater. You don't have the strength of character to grant a debate opponent a point earned, as I've learned.Please explain the barbarism of Judaism.The sacrificial reading of the New Testament is an unfortunate holdover from the barbarism of Judaism. I don't subscribe to the idea that a real God would demand the shedding of innocent blood. "Sacrifice" is as ignorant and primitive an idea as the absurdity that any real God would have a "chosen people".
It is virtually impossible in Jewish law to find someone guilty of a capital crime.
I understand you do not know the complexities of Jewish law and arriving at a guilty verdict.
In the meantime, the RCC was using the Roman Empire to murder at will.
So much for Catholicism being the religion of love.
I have no clue as to who you are referring.
Yeah, we can discuss that.
I believe in God. I just don't believe in magic books.Obviously a poser troll.We could start with the appalling story of Abraham willing to sacrifice his son to please "god".Which innocent?I would be happy to engage you in debate over whether the sacrifice of an innocent played a role in the development of Judaic law, but you are not an honest debater. You don't have the strength of character to grant a debate opponent a point earned, as I've learned.Please explain the barbarism of Judaism.The sacrificial reading of the New Testament is an unfortunate holdover from the barbarism of Judaism. I don't subscribe to the idea that a real God would demand the shedding of innocent blood. "Sacrifice" is as ignorant and primitive an idea as the absurdity that any real God would have a "chosen people".
It is virtually impossible in Jewish law to find someone guilty of a capital crime.
I understand you do not know the complexities of Jewish law and arriving at a guilty verdict.
In the meantime, the RCC was using the Roman Empire to murder at will.
So much for Catholicism being the religion of love.
I have no clue as to who you are referring.
You atheist freak haters are hilarious.
View attachment 185943
Alright, you worship a God one of whose attributes is a demand to be appeased by the shedding of innocent blood. Appalling, primitive, and indefensible. Your turn.
So? Satan believes in God too. And from your posts, looks like you agree with him a lot.I believe in God. I just don't believe in magic books.Obviously a poser troll.We could start with the appalling story of Abraham willing to sacrifice his son to please "god".Which innocent?I would be happy to engage you in debate over whether the sacrifice of an innocent played a role in the development of Judaic law, but you are not an honest debater. You don't have the strength of character to grant a debate opponent a point earned, as I've learned.Please explain the barbarism of Judaism.
It is virtually impossible in Jewish law to find someone guilty of a capital crime.
I understand you do not know the complexities of Jewish law and arriving at a guilty verdict.
In the meantime, the RCC was using the Roman Empire to murder at will.
So much for Catholicism being the religion of love.
I have no clue as to who you are referring.
You atheist freak haters are hilarious.
View attachment 185943
(COMMENT)Can you provide proof for what you say or are you just blowing smoke out your ass again?The UN used a green line in 1949 and a blue line in 2000 because Israel has no border there.Yes, in 1923, there was no Israel as an active government; that is stating the obvious. BUT in the 21st Century, the UN and Lebanon (as well as others) have agreed to maintain the boundary as stipulated.
Oh, come on, Tinmore. If there is no border between Lebanon and Israel then there is no border between Lebanon and Palestine. What argument do you always use when discussing the borders of "Palestine"?
What are you trying to get at?RE Israeli forces shoot unarmed protesters from across Gaza security fence, killing at least 15
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
WoW. You just don't get it.
(COMMENT)Can you provide proof for what you say or are you just blowing smoke out your ass again?The UN used a green line in 1949 and a blue line in 2000 because Israel has no border there.Yes, in 1923, there was no Israel as an active government; that is stating the obvious. BUT in the 21st Century, the UN and Lebanon (as well as others) have agreed to maintain the boundary as stipulated.
Oh, come on, Tinmore. If there is no border between Lebanon and Israel then there is no border between Lebanon and Palestine. What argument do you always use when discussing the borders of "Palestine"?
Whatever name you want to call it, the demarcation is treated IAW A/RES/25/2625. You may not respect it, but then, most of the civilized world gets it. But it is people that don't get it that fight for the wrong reason.
Most Respectfully,
R
No fuckface, I'm a white Irish Catholic who thinks all this chosen crap is a bunch of bullshit. God would not choose a bunch of narcissistic assholes, who run around acting like their shit don't stink.Oh goody, yet another lefty atheist who thinks she’s a theologian.
