Yes, that's very interesting. I've noticed that so many times in these 'Palestinian' reports of 'Israei attacks' there is nothing vaguely resembling a 'reason' given.
And I question the responsibility of the OP for dragging in yet another such biased and incomplete allegation as 'news'. Since she herself has acknowledged the 'report' lacked much concrete information - one wonders what was her point in posting about it before any facts could be ascertained?
I note with dismay that she's been spotted on another section of this site 'thanking' Holston for posting NAZI-soaked 'conspiracy' propaganda, to include his attacks on Jeremiah.
And I question the state of the OP's mind, and her fitness to rightly judge what is and isn't reasonable or proper. She posts 'thanks' to blatant racist hate speech: 'nuff said.
No decent human being needs to discuss anything with Holocaust deniers or those who 'thank' them.
Her "articles" remind me of this funny joke someone emailed me once:
A Guy In Paris
An Israeli in Paris saw a pit bull attacking a toddler. He killed the pit bull and saved the child's life.
Reporters swarmed the fellow. "Tell us! What's your name? All Paris will love you! Tomorrow's headline will be: "Hero Saves Girl from Vicious Dog!"
The guy says, "But I'm not from Paris.
"Reporters: "That's OK. Then the whole of France will love you and tomorrow's headline will read: 'Hero Saves Girl from Vicious Dog!'"
The guy says, "I'm not from France, either."
Reporters: "That's OK also. All Europe will love you. Tomorrow's headlines will shout: 'Hero Saves Girl from Vicious Dog!'"
The guy says, "I'm not from Europe, either.
Reporters: "So, where ARE you from?
The guy says, "I'm from Israel.
Reporters: "OK. Then tomorrow's headlines will proclaim to the world: 'Israeli Kills Girl's Dog!'"