RE: Economic and Social Commission for Western AsiaIsraeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid
et al,
(QUESTIONs)
I notice, quite frequently, that when I write a response that is favorable to Israel on these issues, I have demands made upon me to provide a link for the citation which supports my position.
But when I ask for a citation (a binding citation) on any claim made by the opposing contributors, I am completely ignored or given a laundry list of non-binding references. Most of the responses say things like the Rome Statues as opposed to a specific law.
Also, the opposing views do not give specificity relative to the claims. Citing laws that were not enforceable at the time of the alleged violations. They also leave out agreements made by the Arab Palestinians that pertain to any given complaint.
I was not able to download this latest report, as the page was masked. It is unknown as to whether the report is even offered in English.
I consider, thus far, the lack of a balance in Amnesty International does not suggest that this investigative reporting was anything other than Kangaroo Court to support the position --- predetermined by a one-sided panel.
I know that in the absence of a political solution the Hostile Arab Palestinians are asking for sanctions. I wonder what these distinguished members would think about the US taking action in kind for the unwarranted request for sanctions that they cannot even cite the binding agreements or international laws that support their position?

Most Respectfully,
R