Constitution of the United States should be rescinded since the Brits refused to allow self governing?
The European settlers won the war against Britain - therefore they were free to do whatever they wanted, incl. declaring an independent and sovereign USA. In 1814 Britain's & the USA's, 2nd war confrontation ended. I don't get your comparison.
It's called Teething Problems. Every child and every country goes through it.
If e.g. Britain would declare - the entire coastline of Northern-Ireland, with a depth of 40km belongs to English settlers and the rest (a land locked country) can become an independent North-Ireland - you believe that would be a.) fair? and b.) the IRA or Sinn Féin would accept such a solution? A State Union with Ireland might make it feasible/acceptable - just as a State-Union between the Palestinian West-Bank and the Kingdom of Jordan. A sovereign landlocked N-Ireland solution, IMO certainly not.
A "lasting" peace can't be obtained and hoped for, if the proposal is already at fault, aka perceived to be unfair by one side.
A big portion of the problem with the Ukrainian War is the port at Sevastopol for the Russians. Before 2014, the Ukrainians did not refuse Russia the use of that port for their cargo and Black Sea Fleet. But the Russians have refused Ukraine from using that port. Luckily, Ukraine has other minor ports to ship from but the lack of Sevastopol shipping has harmed them a bit. Since Russia has taken Crimea, locked it down and refused to negotiate with Ukraine then both sides are committed to war against each other.
The leased Russian Sevastopol naval base wasn't an issue before 2008 - since both countries were "economic and military partners" according to the CIS creation agreement of 1991. From 2008 onward it became evident for Russia that this CIS statute wasn't going to last - since the Ukraine had stated its intention to gain NATO membership in 2008 - thus bringing the CIS creation agreement into limbo, but still benefiting economically from the CIS Charter. Due to the intensifying NATO issue, Putin decided to act - aka attack and occupy Sevastopol and Crimea in 2014.
Nothing really to do with the Palestine - Israel issue.
I laid out a program so that everyone gets what they want with very few negatives.
I don't believe that the Palestinians want or will agree towards a landlocked country - whilst Israel enjoys it's beaches and ports "on former Palestinian-Arab settled lands" - that's all I am saying.
Since you would rather the war to continue and to blame it on the "Zionists" then that war will continue since the expected outcome would be the total destruction of the country Israel.
I don't see as to why an e.g. horizontally divided Israel, or a West-Bank union with Jordan would contribute towards the destruction of the remaining "new Israel", any more then the present situation.
The Arab states plus Egypt and Iran never gave a shit about the Palestinian-Arabs and their plight - they simply use it to keep up the tensions with Israel. All of them were/are only "united" in regards to destroying, or keeping Israel down, or preventing further Zionist expansionist intentions, especially towards Gaza and the West-Bank.
Meanwhile countries like Egypt have acknowledge Israels right to exist - and others such as Jordan, Saudi-Arabia, UAE etc. have a far more moderate approach to the subject. Off course as long as Israel keeps up attacking and bombing other sovereign states like Syria - e.g. Iran will make it's best effort to exploit that issue, and the Muslim population in any Muslim country will go on a rampage. Therefore automatically destabilizing any Muslim countries government - You think the Zionists don't know that??
Jordan already supports the West Bank. But has reluctantly refused support for Hamas. Same goes for Egypt and other Muslim Nations. Here is a part of the
Hamas "Constitution",
19. There shall be no recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist entity. Whatever has befallen the land of Palestine in terms of occupation, settlement building, Judaization or changes to its features or falsification of facts is illegitimate. Rights never lapse
The area that Hamas claims is, pretty much, all of Israel. And since they are a Military Terrorist Active Group then they don't think one bit about restraint in how they do it.
Hamas goals and policy are known - therefore their military wing needs to be disabled (simply disarmed) and their political leaders isolated and intl. arrest warrants issued. However NOT by the IDF, but by a UN force. And a UN force will never be constituted without a clarification of the Palestinian-refugee issue. One problem (Hamas) needs to be solved in accordance with the other problem (Palestinian)
But we don't celebrate failures like the Bristish carving up the Middle East.
It isn't being celebrated - but
unconditionally supported by e.g. the USA and the EU. - and that is exactly as to what makes the Zionist faction "unwilling" to compromise or solving the situation in earnest.