Israel police challenge US 'terror' findings

That is the result of terrorist attacks from civilians areas, as the Geneva conventions say because the Palestinians allow the terrorists to attack from civilian areas then they are held fully responsible for any civilian deaths and attacks on civilian areas.
All the pictures reflect terrorist acts of violence.

The difference is, whereas I condemn ALL of them, you not only defend the ones on the right, but also make up bullshit excuses to justify them.

The GC does not say what you claim. If I'm wrong, then post the appropriate portion of the GC to back up what you said, otherwise, shut your ******* terrorist mouth, asshole!
 
only to terrorist supporters who can't tell the difference between a can of spray paint and a bomb that blows up a school bus full of children.
Cans of paint, do not level a 5-story apartment building.



but they're jew children whose buses get blown up, so it's ok, right?
No, it's not okay.

You'll realize that one day when you choose to grow up and act like a responsible adult, instead of an emotional little 10 year old.
 
Jealous much after the US have decided to stop paying the Palestinians to mass murder innocents.................:eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo:
We stopped paying, because the Pals refused to be Israel's little *****!

You obviously, don't mind it at all.
 
It wasn't Jews who shot the Athletes in Munich, or flew the planes into the WTC. Nor was it the Jews that went on a murder spree at the same time as the Hotel was bombed and mass murdered 20 million Hindu's. So what is your point
That Jewish terrorists bombed the Star of David hotel and took innocent lives.
 
That is the result of terrorist attacks from civilians areas, as the Geneva conventions say because the Palestinians allow the terrorists to attack from civilian areas then they are held fully responsible for any civilian deaths and attacks on civilian areas.
All the pictures reflect terrorist acts of violence.

The difference is, whereas I condemn ALL of them, you not only defend the ones on the right, but also make up bullshit excuses to justify them.

The GC does not say what you claim. If I'm wrong, then post the appropriate portion of the GC to back up what you said, otherwise, shut your ******* terrorist mouth, asshole!



The fact is Israel retaliates against acts of war coming from the Palestinians with aggression only after prolonged periods of belligerence. Many people have told them to retaliate one on one, so if the Palestinians fire a rocket Israel replies with a rocket. If they use chemical/biological weapons then Israel replies with the same.

Here you go Article 17 covers it in detail

The burden when it comes to protecting civilians from the combat effects of war falls on three distinct parties: First, the advancing force, which must make every effort to avoid unnecessary harm to civilians. Second, the defending force, which may well have the best chance at removing civilians from the area before it actually becomes the scene of combat. Third, and most important, the civilians themselves. They must avoid participating in the fight. In fact, they should simply avoid, if possible, being in the area where the fighting occurs.

There is no obligation to evacuate civilians from the battle area. At the same time, deliberately endangering noncombatants is a violation of the laws of war. In practice, commanders often avoid the problem of civilians in the battle area by simply giving a warning. This might be accomplished by dropping leaflets, or by making announcements over loudspeakers or radio. At first glance, such a practice might seem unlikely or even blissful. But, as a military matter such warnings make sense (unless, of course, surprise is a factor). First, the commander giving the warning is making a demonstrable effort to avoid harming noncombatants. Second, as a military matter, a warning to civilians that they should remove themselves from the area has the propaganda effect of reminding them that their own military force may be unable to stem the advancing forces. Third, most civilians will move toward their own forces and not their enemy. When that occurs, their own forces may well be presented with a major logistical and tactical problem.
 
The ones on the right were in response to rocket attacks, Billy.
And the rockets were in response to the occupation, which started 37 years before.

Neither one are legal; both are war crimes.



And the occupation was in reply to the terrorist attacks, which started 1400 years previously.

So according to International law the occupation is legal while the terrorist attacks are not.
 
Jealous much after the US have decided to stop paying the Palestinians to mass murder innocents.................:eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo:
We stopped paying, because the Pals refused to be Israel's little *****!

You obviously, don't mind it at all.
So they reverted back to being their own usual terrorist bitches. Righto.
 
It wasn't Jews who shot the Athletes in Munich, or flew the planes into the WTC. Nor was it the Jews that went on a murder spree at the same time as the Hotel was bombed and mass murdered 20 million Hindu's. So what is your point
That Jewish terrorists bombed the Star of David hotel and took innocent lives.
Star of David hotel? You can't even get the name right. Ha h ha. That was a British military HQ in the mandate, and had absolutely nothing to do with the Munich Massacre.

This guy is just blabbering Islamic factoids like he actually knows something. Wow, what a total ignoramus.
 
only to terrorist supporters who can't tell the difference between a can of spray paint and a bomb that blows up a school bus full of children.
Cans of paint, do not level a 5-story apartment building.



but they're jew children whose buses get blown up, so it's ok, right?
No, it's not okay.

You'll realize that one day when you choose to grow up and act like a responsible adult, instead of an emotional little 10 year old.





IED's and bombs don't just mark a wall with slogans, but they do kill indiscriminately children and adults in the area. The targets of preference for the Palestinians are children

Then why do you defend the Palestinians use of bombs to target children, something they admit to doing on a regular basis
 
Jealous much after the US have decided to stop paying the Palestinians to mass murder innocents.................:eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo:
We stopped paying, because the Pals refused to be Israel's little *****!

You obviously, don't mind it at all.




Just about every civilised person sees this differently to you, the EU announced months back that they were withdrawing aid to Palestine because of the terrorism affecting Europe.
 
15th post
It wasn't Jews who shot the Athletes in Munich, or flew the planes into the WTC. Nor was it the Jews that went on a murder spree at the same time as the Hotel was bombed and mass murdered 20 million Hindu's. So what is your point
That Jewish terrorists bombed the Star of David hotel and took innocent lives.



Hardly innocents as they were all military, the same military that were instrumental in the cold blooded murders of hundreds of Jews trying to enter Palestine under the terms of the mandate.
 
As much as the Palestinians are when they get a "pension" if they go to jail. Or get elevated to sainthood when they blow themselves up
Aren't you forgetting something?

I believe you're forgetting 72 of them?



AH! yes the fly shit that altered the meaning of the word of allah, it was originally 72 raisins until a flatulent fly followed through and altered it to virgins. Is it the doe eyed boys that appeals to you so much, or the ever virginal little girls ? :eusa_whistle:
 
It wasn't Jews who shot the Athletes in Munich, or flew the planes into the WTC. Nor was it the Jews that went on a murder spree at the same time as the Hotel was bombed and mass murdered 20 million Hindu's. So what is your point
That Jewish terrorists bombed the Star of David hotel and took innocent lives.
Star of David hotel? You can't even get the name right. Ha h ha. That was a British military HQ in the mandate, and had absolutely nothing to do with the Munich Massacre.

This guy is just blabbering Islamic factoids like he actually knows something. Wow, what a total ignoramus.
That's why I told him the Muslim terrorists bombed the "Star of David Hotel".
 
That Jewish terrorists bombed the Star of David hotel and took innocent lives.
Star of David hotel? You can't even get the name right. Ha h ha. That was a British military HQ in the mandate, and had absolutely nothing to do with the Munich Massacre.

This guy is just blabbering Islamic factoids like he actually knows something. Wow, what a total ignoramus.
That's why I told him the Muslim terrorists bombed the "Star of David Hotel".

They make connections were there are none and reorganize information to find their scenario. They seem to thing everything is connected to Israel to defame in order to justify their attacks, verbal and physical, against Israelis.

They don't realize most of what they believe is incorrect. They try to blame Israel for everything from a scuff on a shoe to global warming and over population.

They should look at themselves before pointing out presumed flaws in others.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom