I'm not trying to argue diddly-squat.You live in a fantasy land. I provided evidence that before the IDF goes into Gaza, they're told not to give any consideration to civilian lives. And they're to go in with the intent of "total destruction". They have shown this behavior time and time again.Your Honor, Plaintiff rests.
We pray that the original judgment of 'pwned' earlier today be allowed to stand.
Now you're trying to argue that, all of a sudden, they're going to switch gears and be concerned about civilians and civilian infrastructure? That's like arguing Charles Manson is pro-life.
But that's your dumbass argument. In spite of all their priors, you claim they're going to act the opposite of what they've done in the past.
My intent here is not to prove nor disprove anything, other than you were proven either a fool or a liar, in our exchange, earlier today.
You claimed that the IDF had intentionally targeted a hospital in Gaza.
You claimed that your blogger was an eyewitness located inside the hospital at the time of the incident.
When both of your claims were effectively refuted earlier today, you attained 'pwned' status.
Your pathetic afterthought-caliber attempts to elude that embarrassing state this evening have failed.
That is the only point that I needed to make for the moment.
Your claim was false.
Your eyewitness turned out to not be an eyewitness, but reliant upon hearsay, after all.
And all the twisting and squirming on the hook which you have foolishly impaled yourself upon will be to no avail.
You've been pwned.
Enjoy.
Last edited:
