Israel is kicking ass

[Sherlock Holmes]

There won't BE any civilians used as human shields. They will be in bomb shelters, or evacuated. That's the way a moral army works.

Unless their Palestinian civilians:

About 50 per cent of Arab communities on the border with Lebanon and Syria have no bomb shelters, compared to 7.5% of Jewish communities in the same area, the head of the military's civil defence command told a Knesset subcommittee in 2018.

That's the way an amoral nation works.

Of course any supposed "bomb shelter" becomes a legitimate target if there's intelligence that it's being used to protect military personnel, would you agree?

 

[Shusha]

Unless their Palestinian civilians: That's the way an amoral nation works.

I can't access that page, but bomb shelters were installed in unrecognized villages after October 7.

Of course any supposed "bomb shelter" becomes a legitimate target if there's intelligence that it's being used to protect military personnel, would you agree?

Sigh. Yes. Military objectives are military objectives. This isn't difficult.

There won't be any civilians embedded with a military objective in Israel. See?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I can't access that page, but bomb shelters were installed in unrecognized villages after October 7.

Sigh. Yes. Military objectives are military objectives. This isn't difficult.

Not for me, but you're clearly having trouble, because...

There won't be any civilians embedded with a military objective in Israel. See?

Well that's a delusional claim because on Oct 7th the IDF designated people's homes (Jews) as military objectives and attacked them and killed embedded civilians, so time to snap out of your fantasy and start seeing reality like the rest of us.

 

[Shusha]

Well that's a delusional claim because on Oct 7th the IDF designated people's homes (Jews) as military objectives and attacked them and killed embedded civilians, so time to snap out of your fantasy and start seeing reality like the rest of us.

Seriously?! You can't tell the difference between intentionally embedded military objectives within civilian protected places and enemy combatants attacking civilians in civilian protected places? The IDF did not designate HOMES as military objectives. The military objectives were the enemy combatants committing crimes against humanity.

Let me walk you through it:

When an armed militia attacks civilians in civilian protected places without a military objective that is a crime against humanity. The people guilty of the crime against humanity are those attacking civilians with no military objective. Hamas is guilty of crime against humanity for its attacks on October 7.

When a military responds to an armed militia of enemy combatants who are attacking civilians in civilian protected places that military is attacking military objectives (the enemy combatants) with the intent to inflict the least incidental harm. The people guilty of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity are those attacking civilians. Hamas is guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity for its attacks on October 7. Israel, while targeting clear military objectives/enemy combatants, are NOT guilty of war crimes, even if there is some incidental harm.

When an armed militia or the military of a government builds a tunnel under a hospital, or hides weapons in a school, or launches rockets or other attacks from a mosque, that armed militia is intentionally placing military objectives within civilian protected places. Guess what? That is a war crime committed by the armed militia: Hamas.

When a military responds to attacks where there is a military objective intentionally embedded with civilians in a civilian protected place, and targets that military objective, even with the risk of incidental harm, that military is NOT committing a war crime. Israel, when it eliminates military objectives in civilian protected places is NOT committing a war crime.

When a military removes civilians from military objectives and either evacuates them away from threat of harm, and/or places civilians in shelters to keep them from harm, that is NOT a war crime. In fact, that is the obligation under law.

Hamas is guilty of the crimes against humanity / war crimes of: targeting civilians, placing military objectives within civilian protected places, failing to make a distinction between combatants and protected persons, failing to remove civilians from areas of battle and military objectives. Israel is guilty of none of these things.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Gaza's own government is legally and morally responsible for providing for its citizens.

And they certainly got the financing from weak western appeasing governments.

They could have turned that place into a jewel of the Middle East, with all that cash.

Instead of using it to try to eradicate the Jewish State.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Seriously?! You can't tell the difference between intentionally embedded military objectives within civilian protected places and enemy combatants attacking civilians in civilian protected places? The IDF did not designate HOMES as military objectives. The military objectives were the enemy combatants committing crimes against humanity.

Let me walk you through it:

When an armed militia attacks civilians in civilian protected places without a military objective that is a crime against humanity. The people guilty of the crime against humanity are those attacking civilians with no military objective. Hamas is guilty of crime against humanity for its attacks on October 7.

When a military responds to an armed militia of enemy combatants who are attacking civilians in civilian protected places that military is attacking military objectives (the enemy combatants) with the intent to inflict the least incidental harm. The people guilty of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity are those attacking civilians. Hamas is guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity for its attacks on October 7. Israel, while targeting clear military objectives/enemy combatants, are NOT guilty of war crimes, even if there is some incidental harm.

When an armed militia or the military of a government builds a tunnel under a hospital, or hides weapons in a school, or launches rockets or other attacks from a mosque, that armed militia is intentionally placing military objectives within civilian protected places. Guess what? That is a war crime committed by the armed militia: Hamas.

When a military responds to attacks where there is a military objective intentionally embedded with civilians in a civilian protected place, and targets that military objective, even with the risk of incidental harm, that military is NOT committing a war crime. Israel, when it eliminates military objectives in civilian protected places is NOT committing a war crime.

When a military removes civilians from military objectives and either evacuates them away from threat of harm, and/or places civilians in shelters to keep them from harm, that is NOT a war crime. In fact, that is the obligation under law.

Hamas is guilty of the crimes against humanity / war crimes of: targeting civilians, placing military objectives within civilian protected places, failing to make a distinction between combatants and protected persons, failing to remove civilians from areas of battle and military objectives. Israel is guilty of none of these things.

Seriously? you cannot see the wood for the trees.

Iran

United States

Israel is despised across the globe, it must be wiped off the map like we once did to another racial supremacist "blood and soil" tribal clan who deluded themselves they were special.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

The reactionary Israeli regime is the enemy of all the nations of the world.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There was never a such thing as a Native American 'Nation'.

Right, there were several.

 

[Roudy]

For all that are concerned for civilians, why don’t these Palestinian Hamas animals release the hostages, some of which are Americans? That could help end the war. Or perhaps they could stop hiding behind their own women and children in order to reduce civilian casualties. Such a sad, sick depraved people and culture.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

For all that are concerned for civilians, why don’t these Palestinian Hamas animals release the hostages, some of which are Americans?

Israel is bombing Gaza daily, if all hostages were released would Israel stop?

That could help end the war.

In what way, can you explain your reasoning here?

Or perhaps they could stop hiding behind their own women and children in order to reduce civilian casualties. Such a sad, sick depraved people and culture.

Do you mean like the way Jewish rebels in the Warsaw ghetto in 1943 used to hide behind Jewish women and children?

The reactionary Zionist regime does not care about hostages, Nazinyahu could not care less about them. The only value they have is as pawns in Israel's PR and propaganda campaigns. The reactionary Israelis are monsters brought back from the stone age, their Hannibal directive is clear proof of that.

If getting hostages out was a truly important goal for the regime they'd have gotten them all out, unharmed BEFORE bombing Gaza. Israel could have decoupled the two goals 1) Get hostages out and 2) Destroy Hamas but they chose to conflate the two and then give priority to the destruction of Gaza.

Israel's own decisions have caused the deaths of every Gaza hostage so far, the captors have tried their best to preserve their lives under extremely difficult circumstances, they care more than Nazinyahu et-al does.

If a member of my family had been taken hostage by Hamas on Oct 7th, I'd want Nazinyahu's head on a platter, he is the person I would blame and pursue nobody else. He has sacrificed other people's family members simply because a war is a huge help to him personally, that's the true "sad, sick depraved people and culture".

The Israeli public are doomed because they do not accept Nazinyahu's huge guilt here and even support him, the Israeli public for the most part agree with the regime's bloodthirstiness and racism, they want war as much as Nazinyahu does, so there's no prospect of a coup or revolution in Israel, it is horribly evil to the core and will remain so until it's eventual and glorious destruction.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

She is a rabid antisemite who twists the law into a weapon against the Jewish people. She uses nonsense words and pretends she speaks with the authority of the law.

Please provide at least one example (i.e. a credibly sourced quotation) of something she has said that you are interpreting as "rabidly antisemitic", given your obvious conviction and devotion to detail and thoroughness, I trust you'll have no difficulty providing such.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Fuck Israel, bunch of entitled bastards.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Under pressure...

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

]

What Nazinyahu refuses to understand is that despite his much practiced rhetoric and apologetics, we're done with his bullshitting. Under the Rome statute anyone facilitating war crimes is a potential target of the ICC, this is serious stuff and these other countries understand that.

The sooner we see those arrest warrants for these scumbags the better, enough of their bullying and insidious threats to our law courts, cuff the bastards and incarcerate them.

 

[Matted Joybeard]

 

[Roudy]

Israel is bombing Gaza daily, if all hostages were released would Israel stop?

In what way, can you explain your reasoning here?

Do you mean like the way Jewish rebels in the Warsaw ghetto in 1943 used to hide behind Jewish women and children?

The reactionary Zionist regime does not care about hostages, Nazinyahu could not care less about them. The only value they have is as pawns in Israel's PR and propaganda campaigns. The reactionary Israelis are monsters brought back from the stone age, their Hannibal directive is clear proof of that.

If getting hostages out was a truly important goal for the regime they'd have gotten them all out, unharmed BEFORE bombing Gaza. Israel could have decoupled the two goals 1) Get hostages out and 2) Destroy Hamas but they chose to conflate the two and then give priority to the destruction of Gaza.

Israel's own decisions have caused the deaths of every Gaza hostage so far, the captors have tried their best to preserve their lives under extremely difficult circumstances, they care more than Nazinyahu et-al does.

If a member of my family had been taken hostage by Hamas on Oct 7th, I'd want Nazinyahu's head on a platter, he is the person I would blame and pursue nobody else. He has sacrificed other people's family members simply because a war is a huge help to him personally, that's the true "sad, sick depraved people and culture".

The Israeli public are doomed because they do not accept Nazinyahu's huge guilt here and even support him, the Israeli public for the most part agree with the regime's bloodthirstiness and racism, they want war as much as Nazinyahu does, so there's no prospect of a coup or revolution in Israel, it is horribly evil to the core and will remain so until it's eventual and glorious destruction.

Ha ha ha, like most Pali supporters you suffer from mental illness. You think raping and torturing girls at a music festival, shoving babies, decapitating innocent people, etc is a form of resistance or freedom fighting. The horrors these Islamist Palestinian subhuman animals have committed would make Nazis blush. Sad thing is these cowards care even less for their own people, they run and hide behind their own women and children.

Israel will not stop until every single one of these monsters are wiped out, and they are doing a great job of it.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Matted Joybeard]

Our support remains ironclad.

 

[Mac-7]

Israel wont tell biden because he might warn Iran