Playing the devil's advocate here, the Palestinians might argue that the building is eating away from their future state.
I know, right?! THAT is what we should be talking about. That is legitimate criticism with a focus on solving the problem.
But this is what the OP gives us:
These Jewish supremacists do not want peace. Anyone who claims otherwise is lying. They live above the laws of every other nation on earth. Where else on our entire planet can you do this and not be a legitimate military target?
How are we supposed to discuss real solutions in a meaningful way in the face of THIS kind of blind hatred? We are not debating against people who want a future state for Palestinians. We are debating against people who see Jews as evil and without rights. We can't fight that very real fight while pretending that its just a fight about who gets Ramat Shlomo and who gets Beit Hanina and who gets Anata.
How are we supposed to discuss real solutions in a meaningful way in the face of the idea that the mere presence of Jews is cause to kill them (legitmately, of course, as legal targets, because....Jews, duh.)?
How are we supposed to discuss real solutions in a meaningful way when pre-conditions to sovereignty is an ethnically cleansed and completely homogenized culture?
How are we supposed to discuss real solutions in a meaningful way when even ethnically cleansing our own people from Gaza, from the Temple Mount, from East Jerusalem is not enough?
And the truly ridiculous thing is that while the Palestinians protest and whine and commit low-level, ineffectual terrorist attacks against innocents -- Israel has taken Jerusalem. Dividing Jerusalem is no longer an option. Israel will never let that happen.