SuperDemocrat
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2015
- 8,200
- 869
- 275
- Banned
- #1
I'm kind of curious how this became a controversial issue in the first place. We have been enforcing immigration laws since they were first formed over a hundred years ago without any complaints. Now that the immigrants are hispanics/cheap labor a lot of people are getting upset that we may kick out the illegals/cheap labor. The very first thing that people say whenever we attempt to enforce these laws is 'who will pick our fruits' or 'what about the farmer who needs cheap labor'? Shouldn't this make us think that the resistance to enforcing these laws isn't coming from middle-class America but from super rich corporations who have helped to craft some really good exceptions into the immigration laws so someone can 'pick the fruits'.
Consider the connection that may exist between many big businesses and media outlets since they own their own each other's stock. They tell anyone and everyone who opposes enforcing immigration laws are racist which does a good job of because the 10% they own in Fox news matches the 10% they have in some corporate farm. Maybe their is a conflict of interest that is going on here?
Consider the connection that may exist between many big businesses and media outlets since they own their own each other's stock. They tell anyone and everyone who opposes enforcing immigration laws are racist which does a good job of because the 10% they own in Fox news matches the 10% they have in some corporate farm. Maybe their is a conflict of interest that is going on here?