ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

[flacaltenn]

You partisan shills are the LAZIEST, most useless drones in America's arsenal.. 10 seconds on the Web would get you 1/2 dozen confirming sources for this.

Report: ISIS calls for assassination of Barron Trump

I heard it on ABC radio news today. INSTEAD of working to LEARN anything, you just go 10 posts into "impeaching the source".. Those who impeach TOO many sources in today's political enviro just end up being the dumbest sluts around..

 

[flacaltenn]

This is terrible. They even posted a map where he goes to school. If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain. After all, they helped create ISIS.


ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

ISIS came into being in 2005 after W defeated Saddam Hussein, disbanding Saddam’s army and letting them keep their weapons. Saddam’s officers teamed up with the most radical elements of AQ to form ISIS.

It had nothing to do with Obama, Hillary or John McCain and everything to do with Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld.

Complete and utter hogwash. ISIS came into being in the 2010 to 2013 time frame. Was formed by a group of Iraqi resisters with Al Queda ties that HAD BEEN locked up in military prison in Iraq. They were released at the end of the Bush Admin because of decisions to hand control of the prisons to the Iraqis. And the stone stupid morons let them out. It wasn't until about 2013 that they started kicking the Iraqi military ass and TAKING those American weapons for their own. ABOUT the time, the Procrastinator in Chief was calling them " the JV team" in the press. By the time Obama even recognized them as a threat, they controlled about 20% of Iraq and more than a 30% of Syria...

 

[frigidweirdo]

This is terrible. They even posted a map where he goes to school. If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain. After all, they helped create ISIS.


ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

Yeah, terrible. But then Trump and many of the right have been calling for the deaths of ISIS kids.

What comes around, goes around.

 

[John Shaw]

This is terrible. They even posted a map where he goes to school. If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain. After all, they helped create ISIS.


ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

Yeah, terrible. But then Trump and many of the right have been calling for the deaths of ISIS kids.

What comes around, goes around.

ISIS kids should be killed, though. Anyone associated with the rape squad should be eradicated, including future terrorists ... I mean, children.

 

[frigidweirdo]

This is terrible. They even posted a map where he goes to school. If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain. After all, they helped create ISIS.


ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

Yeah, terrible. But then Trump and many of the right have been calling for the deaths of ISIS kids.

What comes around, goes around.

ISIS kids should be killed, though. Anyone associated with the rape squad should be eradicated, including future terrorists ... I mean, children.

And ISIS are saying that the kids of those who bomb, invaded, kill etc in America, the UK etc should be killed too. Anyone associated with the biggest threat to world peace should be annihilated, that'd be the voters and their kids too.

 

[John Shaw]

This is terrible. They even posted a map where he goes to school. If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain. After all, they helped create ISIS.


ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

Yeah, terrible. But then Trump and many of the right have been calling for the deaths of ISIS kids.

What comes around, goes around.

ISIS kids should be killed, though. Anyone associated with the rape squad should be eradicated, including future terrorists ... I mean, children.

And ISIS are saying that the kids of those who bomb, invaded, kill etc in America, the UK etc should be killed too. Anyone associated with the biggest threat to world peace should be annihilated, that'd be the voters and their kids too.

The U.S. is not a raping, slaving death cult, so ... yeah. Not really seeing much of a moral equivalency between the U.S. and ISIS. The fact that you seem to believe there is one tells me a lot about you.

 

[FA_Q2]

In reality if Iraq had never been invaded, occupied, then decimated by civil war, ISIS would never have formed. Who got us involved in Iraq in the first place. Raygun. Who got us involved in the second place? Bush(41). And for the hat trick who in the third place? Bush(43). Hmmm all GOP. Amazing what happens when you forget history.

Learn to forget.

Yes, the left never meddled in ME affairs.
/sarcasm

Are you nuts?

 

[FA_Q2]

I do not see how this is even newsworthy.

ISIS is calling for EVERYONE in western society to be killed. I could care less.

 

[frigidweirdo]

This is terrible. They even posted a map where he goes to school. If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain. After all, they helped create ISIS.


ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

Yeah, terrible. But then Trump and many of the right have been calling for the deaths of ISIS kids.

What comes around, goes around.

ISIS kids should be killed, though. Anyone associated with the rape squad should be eradicated, including future terrorists ... I mean, children.

And ISIS are saying that the kids of those who bomb, invaded, kill etc in America, the UK etc should be killed too. Anyone associated with the biggest threat to world peace should be annihilated, that'd be the voters and their kids too.

The U.S. is not a raping, slaving death cult, so ... yeah. Not really seeing much of a moral equivalency between the U.S. and ISIS. The fact that you seem to believe there is one tells me a lot about you.

The US has invaded Iraq and Afghanistan in the last 15 years.

It's also bombed Libya, Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia and Syria, at the very least.

The US has been involved in regime change or attempted regime in Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, North Korea, to name a few.

The US has created the conditions for violence and extremism to spread. Without the US, ISIS would never have existed.

You're talking morality to me here? Why? The US is hardly moral in what it does. So it doesn't have a policy of going around raping people. However millions of people are dead because of US foreign policy. I'm sorry, rape is bad, ISIS is bad, but this doesn't make the US good.

 

[Esmeralda]

This is terrible. They even posted a map where he goes to school. If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain. After all, they helped create ISIS.


ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

"If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain."
OMG, you are one crazy AH.

 

[John Shaw]

The U.S. has made mistakes. The U.S. has also held the capability to annihilate the world several times over in the palm of its hands and has yet to use a nuclear weapon since WWII.

Now ask yourself what ISIS would do with the kind of power the U.S. wields. Yeah ... that's what I thought.

 

[frigidweirdo]

This is terrible. They even posted a map where he goes to school. If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain. After all, they helped create ISIS.


ISIS Calls for Assassination of Barron Trump After Posting His Personal Details Online

"If something should happen to Barron, the blame should squarely be on Obama, Hillary, and John McCain."
OMG, you are one crazy AH.

Why not Bush?

Bush invaded Iraq. Bush put Bremer in charge who got rid of the Iraqi police and armed forces making hundreds of thousands of people unemployed with no chance of getting a job and needing to earn money. Making a power vacuum that allowed Iranian backed groups, among others (probably Saudi too) going around causing massive problems and preventing Iraq becoming stable, which then led to ISIS.

Bush's fault.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The U.S. has made mistakes. The U.S. has also held the capability to annihilate the world several times over in the palm of its hands and has yet to use a nuclear weapon since WWII.

Now ask yourself what ISIS would do with the kind of power the U.S. wields. Yeah ... that's what I thought.

Again, I didn't say ISIS was good, but I'm also saying the US isn't good. The US wants to dominate the world, and knows that using nukes will set people against it.

ISIS might not use nukes were it in a position of power where it didn't feel threatened all the time.

Circumstances don't make ones actions morally better.

The US is evil.

 

[Doubledareme]

The U.S. has made mistakes. The U.S. has also held the capability to annihilate the world several times over in the palm of its hands and has yet to use a nuclear weapon since WWII.

Now ask yourself what ISIS would do with the kind of power the U.S. wields. Yeah ... that's what I thought.

ISIS would do what the U.S. always has always done, seek its advantage and say that it is indispensable to world peace therefore one cannot question us, no matter what we do. Thanks and have a nice day.

.

 

[John Shaw]

The U.S. has made mistakes. The U.S. has also held the capability to annihilate the world several times over in the palm of its hands and has yet to use a nuclear weapon since WWII.

Now ask yourself what ISIS would do with the kind of power the U.S. wields. Yeah ... that's what I thought.

ISIS would do what the U.S. always has always done, seek its advantage and say that it is indispensable to world peace therefore one cannot question us, no matter what we do. Thanks and have a nice day.

.

Actually, ISIS would probably destroy the world. All that would remain would be an apocalyptic wasteland where there would be nothing but a meaningless, primitive misery. You guys have no idea how truly demented ISIS is if you honestly think they would be anywhere near as reasonable as the U.S. has been all these years.

 

[John Shaw]

The U.S. has made mistakes. The U.S. has also held the capability to annihilate the world several times over in the palm of its hands and has yet to use a nuclear weapon since WWII.

Now ask yourself what ISIS would do with the kind of power the U.S. wields. Yeah ... that's what I thought.

Again, I didn't say ISIS was good, but I'm also saying the US isn't good. The US wants to dominate the world, and knows that using nukes will set people against it.

ISIS might not use nukes were it in a position of power where it didn't feel threatened all the time.

Circumstances don't make ones actions morally better.

The US is evil.

The U.S. is evil. Haha. Good one. The U.S. has kept the world more free and more prosperous by far than China or Russia ever would have. You know, the only other super powers, kept in check only by the United States?

But shit, the U.S. seems to be deteriorating. Maybe you'll finally get your wish to live under a Chinese-led world. Maybe in a few decades you'll look back and think that the U.S. wasn't all that bad after all ...

 

[frigidweirdo]

The U.S. has made mistakes. The U.S. has also held the capability to annihilate the world several times over in the palm of its hands and has yet to use a nuclear weapon since WWII.

Now ask yourself what ISIS would do with the kind of power the U.S. wields. Yeah ... that's what I thought.

Again, I didn't say ISIS was good, but I'm also saying the US isn't good. The US wants to dominate the world, and knows that using nukes will set people against it.

ISIS might not use nukes were it in a position of power where it didn't feel threatened all the time.

Circumstances don't make ones actions morally better.

The US is evil.

The U.S. is evil. Haha. Good one. The U.S. has kept the world more free and more prosperous by far than China or Russia ever would have. You know, the only other super powers, kept in check only by the United States?

But shit, the U.S. seems to be deteriorating. Maybe you'll finally get your wish to live under a Chinese-led world. Maybe in a few decades you'll look back and think that the U.S. wasn't all that bad after all ...

Has it? How about Venezuela?

Democratically elected leader ousted in govt backed coup d'etat? Then managed to get back in power as the coup fizzled out. Does this make people "more free and more prosperous"?

How about Cuba? US sanctions against it for decades which impoverished the country so the US could say "hey, look, Socialism doesn't work".

How about OPEC countries. The US didn't like OPEC taking charge (under Chavez from about 2000 onward) so tried to get rid of Chavez, got rid of Hussein, got rid of Gaddafi, tried to get rid of the Iranian leadership and has had sanctions against Venezuela AND Iran for quite a while now.

How about supporting Pol Pot in Cambodia?

List of authoritarian regimes supported by the United States - Wikipedia

Here's the list of authoritarian regimes the US has supported.

At present there are Thirty countries on this list,

Here's the map.

Oh, yeah, so moral that the US will support just about anyone.

 

[John Shaw]

The U.S. has made mistakes. The U.S. has also held the capability to annihilate the world several times over in the palm of its hands and has yet to use a nuclear weapon since WWII.

Now ask yourself what ISIS would do with the kind of power the U.S. wields. Yeah ... that's what I thought.

Again, I didn't say ISIS was good, but I'm also saying the US isn't good. The US wants to dominate the world, and knows that using nukes will set people against it.

ISIS might not use nukes were it in a position of power where it didn't feel threatened all the time.

Circumstances don't make ones actions morally better.

The US is evil.

The U.S. is evil. Haha. Good one. The U.S. has kept the world more free and more prosperous by far than China or Russia ever would have. You know, the only other super powers, kept in check only by the United States?

But shit, the U.S. seems to be deteriorating. Maybe you'll finally get your wish to live under a Chinese-led world. Maybe in a few decades you'll look back and think that the U.S. wasn't all that bad after all ...

Has it? How about Venezuela?

Democratically elected leader ousted in govt backed coup d'etat? Then managed to get back in power as the coup fizzled out. Does this make people "more free and more prosperous"?

How about Cuba? US sanctions against it for decades which impoverished the country so the US could say "hey, look, Socialism doesn't work".

How about OPEC countries. The US didn't like OPEC taking charge (under Chavez from about 2000 onward) so tried to get rid of Chavez, got rid of Hussein, got rid of Gaddafi, tried to get rid of the Iranian leadership and has had sanctions against Venezuela AND Iran for quite a while now.

How about supporting Pol Pot in Cambodia?

List of authoritarian regimes supported by the United States - Wikipedia

Here's the list of authoritarian regimes the US has supported.

At present there are Thirty countries on this list,

Here's the map.

Oh, yeah, so moral that the US will support just about anyone.

And despite that, the U.S. still promotes freedom and democracy. Neither of which is considered important in China or Russia. In other words, despite constantly compromising on our values for the sake of pragmatism (or at least what is viewed as such at the time), we still support, promote, and believe in Western ideals.

Neither of the other alternatives give a flying **** about equal rights, opportunity, or freedom. Reporters there regularly have mysterious disappearances or sudden deaths if they step out of line.

Maybe you just want your life to be managed by big brother. In that case, Russia and China are perfect for you. Otherwise, you'd probably rather have a U.S./European led world.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The U.S. has made mistakes. The U.S. has also held the capability to annihilate the world several times over in the palm of its hands and has yet to use a nuclear weapon since WWII.

Now ask yourself what ISIS would do with the kind of power the U.S. wields. Yeah ... that's what I thought.

Again, I didn't say ISIS was good, but I'm also saying the US isn't good. The US wants to dominate the world, and knows that using nukes will set people against it.

ISIS might not use nukes were it in a position of power where it didn't feel threatened all the time.

Circumstances don't make ones actions morally better.

The US is evil.

The U.S. is evil. Haha. Good one. The U.S. has kept the world more free and more prosperous by far than China or Russia ever would have. You know, the only other super powers, kept in check only by the United States?

But shit, the U.S. seems to be deteriorating. Maybe you'll finally get your wish to live under a Chinese-led world. Maybe in a few decades you'll look back and think that the U.S. wasn't all that bad after all ...

Has it? How about Venezuela?

Democratically elected leader ousted in govt backed coup d'etat? Then managed to get back in power as the coup fizzled out. Does this make people "more free and more prosperous"?

How about Cuba? US sanctions against it for decades which impoverished the country so the US could say "hey, look, Socialism doesn't work".

How about OPEC countries. The US didn't like OPEC taking charge (under Chavez from about 2000 onward) so tried to get rid of Chavez, got rid of Hussein, got rid of Gaddafi, tried to get rid of the Iranian leadership and has had sanctions against Venezuela AND Iran for quite a while now.

How about supporting Pol Pot in Cambodia?

List of authoritarian regimes supported by the United States - Wikipedia

Here's the list of authoritarian regimes the US has supported.

At present there are Thirty countries on this list,

Here's the map.

Oh, yeah, so moral that the US will support just about anyone.

And despite that, the U.S. still promotes freedom and democracy. Neither of which is considered important in China or Russia. In other words, despite constantly compromising on our values for the sake of pragmatism (or at least what is viewed as such at the time), we still support, promote, and believe in Western ideals.

Neither of the other alternatives give a flying **** about equal rights, opportunity, or freedom. Reporters there regularly have mysterious disappearances or sudden deaths if they step out of line.

Maybe you just want your life to be managed by big brother. In that case, Russia and China are perfect for you. Otherwise, you'd probably rather have a U.S./European led world.

Yes, funny that.

The coup against Hugo Chavez was conducted by a group called The National Endowment for Democracy, yes, supposedly there to PROMOTE democracy, and generally worked to GET RID of people the US didn't like.

National Endowment for Democracy - Wikipedia

"It is funded primarily through an annual allocation from the U.S. Congress"

https://williamblum.org/chapters/freeing-the-world-to-death/us-coup-against-hugo-chavez-of-venezuela-2002

Here you can see some of the money they spent to get the coup going.

Now, I'm not trying to be funny here, but who the **** tries to promote DEMOCRACY by trying to DEPOSE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED LEADERS?

Let's see. The US tells countries like Iran that they need to be more democratic. Why? Well, Iran isn't the most democratic country in the world, is it? I mean, they hold elections to elect people, but the head of state stays the same. But they SUPPORT Saudi Arabia. Yes, a country which has LESS democracy than Iran. The US NEVER criticizes the House of Saud. Why not? Because of money.

The US uses "democracy" as a key word to attack countries like Iran, like China, like Russia, in order to make them seem less legitimate.

However the US elected Trump based on an election where people in Wyoming get THREE TIMES the power for their vote, and it still doesn't count, because only 12 states in the US really get to elect the leader, where people in DC don't get a say, people in Puerto Rico don't get a say. Democracy? **** no it's not democracy.

So why is a country which can't organize democracy at home, going around the world telling others to be more democratic, but in reality cherry picking which countries it tells to be more democratic?

Because like Trump, the US will say ******* anything to get what it wants. They made up shit to go to war in Iraq. We know why they went, to weaken OPEC. Do they admit it? No. Why bomb Libya? OPEC. Why not invade Syria? Not OPEC.

Hmm....

 

[John Shaw]

Well I guess you'll soon get your wish for a China-dominated world, because Europe is full of pussies who can't do anything without the U.S., and the evil U.S. is tearing apart at the seams. Guess we'll find out just how right you are, since apparently you know everything. I just hope you don't live here.