Is Trump Biodegradable?

[schmidlap]

Your childish response has nothing to do with what I posted.

In addition to not being very bright, your reading comprehension isn't so great either.

Please provide a list of all professional, climatological associations that are in denial of anthropogenic global warming.

 

[schmidlap]

That is soooooooooo true.

It's unfortunate that the left can't behave that way.

Of what other scientific and medical disciplines are you contemptuous because they do not spout your ideological dogma?

 

[schmidlap]

Yes, we are aware of this.

We are also aware that you and others have used that to piss, fling poo and drool.

As of late we also know that many climate scientists have distanced themselves from you saying there is no need for climate panic. Seems the end of the world didn't happen.

But now you have this:

If climate change keeps you up at night, here's how to cope - Harvard Health

Climate anxiety is distress related to worries about how the effects of climate change. It's more likely to affect adolescents and young adults, leading to chronic stress, depression, anxiet...

www.health.harvard.edu

Please list all the reputable scientific organizations that express your "enormous consensus among expert scientists who reject human-caused global warming,"

 

[80zephyr]

The world has pumped more than 1,800 gigatonnes of CO₂ into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution began,

Science deniers pretend that has had no impact on the atmosphere, despite the predictable rise in temperature that reflects that rise in emissions.

Neither is the earth flat, despite what science deniers may insist.

You know who denys science? The dumb ***** who insisted on going green instead of nuclear. If global warming is really life or death, they should have chosen the simplest surest way to deal with it.

They did not.

So, its hard for anyone to take them seriously. Especially when they ALL talk the talk, but NONE of them walk the walk.

 

[schmidlap]

You know who denys science? The dumb ***** who insisted on going green instead of nuclear. If global warming is really life or death, they should have chosen the simplest surest way to deal with it.

They did not.

So, its hard for anyone to take them seriously. Especially when they ALL talk the talk, but NONE of them walk the walk.

If you cannot takes seriously the consensus of climatologists regarding climate seriously, so be it.

It is first necessary to recognize reality before assessing potential solutions.

 

[80zephyr]

If you cannot takes seriously the consensus of climatologists regarding climate seriously, so be it.

It is first necessary to recognize reality before assessing potential solutions.

They don't need my affirmation to do the right thing. They didn't. If the world burns its because the "experts" hooked their wagon to an unproven, hit and miss, solution.

 

[g5000]

The faction of society that can't define a woman and claims that global warming is the source of all disasters now accuses Trump of being a science denier.

"So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you’re going to test that too. Sounds interesting, right? And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs." - Donald Trump, epidemiologist



“When you test, you have a case. When you test, you find something is wrong with people. If we didn’t do any testing, we would have very few cases.” - Donald Trump, very stable genius



.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Please provide a list of all professional, climatological associations that are in denial of anthropogenic global warming.

Please show me where I said such an association existed.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Of what other scientific and medical disciplines are you contemptuous because they do not spout your ideological dogma?

Clearly your comprehension hasn't improved in the last 24 hours.

I said, it's the left that won't keep it's dogma out of the science.

How about you get some rest before trying again

 

[HikerGuy83]

Please list all the reputable scientific organizations that express your "enormous consensus among expert scientists who reject human-caused global warming,"

See post #148

 

[HikerGuy83]

If you cannot takes seriously the consensus of climatologists regarding climate seriously, so be it.

This is a perfect example of a left wing overlord wannabe.

Essentially insisting someone adopt his POV.

It is first necessary to recognize reality before assessing potential solutions.

Uh, no it isn't and you saying it is necessary, again, is so left wing.

Nuclear is a good call, AGW or not. Because things are getting warmer and were headed that way before you showed up. We are going to need more power going forward.

Just ask China. They brought 80GW on line last year (coal fired)

More could be on the cards: the Chinese government has a target of bringing 80GW of new coal-fired generation capacity online for the whole of 2024.

China’s coal-fired power boom may be ending amid slowdown in permits

Permits for coal-fired power plants drop by 83% despite leading world in construction as focus turns to renewables

www.theguardian.com

 

[HikerGuy83]

They don't need my affirmation to do the right thing. They didn't. If the world burns its because the "experts" hooked their wagon to an unproven, hit and miss, solution.

Even the French get it.

Oh look....my dog just schmidlapped on the floor......bad Fido.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Please provide a list of all professional, climatological associations that are in denial of anthropogenic global warming.

How many new nuclear reactors do the professional, climatological associations think we should build to stop anthropogenic global warming?

 

[Muhammed]

Of course, ones hope so, but Trump has been resolute and relentless in his denial and defiance of accepted science, especially medical and environmental. He dismisses experts in every academic discipline if their empirical data conflicts with his irrational dogma.

Putting aside the comfort that human biology affords us in this matter, the cost of imposed and enforced ignorance in anthropogenic climate change will be monumental, compounded by the human suffering that will, inevitably, result from Trump’s contempt for science and love of dirty fuels.

View attachment 1120474
​

There is virtual global consensus among the most qualified in climatology, but that expert unanimity is treated with contempt by Trump because many of those experts are foreign, from all parts of the globe, and acknowledged by every other nation on earth.

​

When the Trump regime declared two weeks ago that it would largely disregard the economic cost of climate change as it sets policies and regulations, it was just the latest step in a multi-pronged effort to erase global warming from the American agenda.​

​

But Trump is doing more than just turning a blind eye to the fact that the planet is growing hotter. He is weakening the country’s capacity to understand global warming and to prepare for its consequences.​

​

The administration has dismantled climate research, firing some of the nation’s top scientists, and gutted efforts to chart how fast greenhouse gases are building up in the atmosphere and what that means for the economy, employment, agriculture, health and other aspects of American society. The government will no longer track major sources of greenhouse gases, data that has been used to measure the scale and identify sources of the problem for the past 15 years.​

​

“We’re not doing that climate change, you know, crud, anymore,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins [a Trump sycophant with no climatological qualifications] told Fox Business on May 8…​

​

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/climate/trump-climate-denial.html​

​

Climate and environment updates:
Climate change adds month of extreme heat for 4 billion people

View attachment 1120482
"She called science 'crud!'
I like that!"



​

**** off! All that bullshit was thoroughly debunked over a decade ago.

The leaked climategate e-mails proved that it wasn't merely poor science, it was fraudulent science.

And co-founder of the IPCC, Maurice Strong, admitted that the goal was to deindustrialize the USA.

You global warming doomsday cult dupes are a bunch of low IQ and therefore easily brainwashed retarded fools.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

**** off! All that bullshit was thoroughly debunked over a decade ago.

The leaked climategate e-mails proved that it wasn't merely poor science, it was fraudulent science.

And co-founder of the IPCC, Maurice Strong, admitted that the goal was to deindustrialize the USA.

You global warming doomsday cult dupes are a bunch of low IQ and therefore easily brainwashed retarded fools.

Is Michael Mann still struggling to pay off the legal judgements against him? LOL!

 

[keep-smiling]

"So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you’re going to test that too. Sounds interesting, right? And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs." - Donald Trump, epidemiologist



“When you test, you have a case. When you test, you find something is wrong with people. If we didn’t do any testing, we would have very few cases.” - Donald Trump, very stable genius



.

trump truly is the poster child for Dunning-Kruger

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Your childish response has nothing to do with what I posted.

Quite a common occurrence on this site.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Even the French get it.

Oh look....my dog just schmidlapped on the floor......bad Fido.

Regarding the French, l remember here in Europe, when the Germans got over-hysterical about Chernobyl. (A friend of mine was convinced the world as coming to an end. She even had dreams about it) We’re both still here!

Not long after that, l think it was Chancellor Schroeder decreed that all nuclear power stations in Germany would be shut down at the rate of one per year. Looking at it long term, where were we going to get, or should l say buy, our energy from? Most likely from the nuclear French, who tended to build their power stations on the German border.

Which defeated the whole rationale of the neurotic Germans. After all, radiation, which scared them to death, doesn’t adhere to borders.

 

[j-mac]

Of course, ones hope so, but Trump has been resolute and relentless in his denial and defiance of accepted science, especially medical and environmental. He dismisses experts in every academic discipline if their empirical data conflicts with his irrational dogma.

Putting aside the comfort that human biology affords us in this matter, the cost of imposed and enforced ignorance in anthropogenic climate change will be monumental, compounded by the human suffering that will, inevitably, result from Trump’s contempt for science and love of dirty fuels.

View attachment 1120474
​

There is virtual global consensus among the most qualified in climatology, but that expert unanimity is treated with contempt by Trump because many of those experts are foreign, from all parts of the globe, and acknowledged by every other nation on earth.

​

When the Trump regime declared two weeks ago that it would largely disregard the economic cost of climate change as it sets policies and regulations, it was just the latest step in a multi-pronged effort to erase global warming from the American agenda.​

​

But Trump is doing more than just turning a blind eye to the fact that the planet is growing hotter. He is weakening the country’s capacity to understand global warming and to prepare for its consequences.​

​

The administration has dismantled climate research, firing some of the nation’s top scientists, and gutted efforts to chart how fast greenhouse gases are building up in the atmosphere and what that means for the economy, employment, agriculture, health and other aspects of American society. The government will no longer track major sources of greenhouse gases, data that has been used to measure the scale and identify sources of the problem for the past 15 years.​

​

“We’re not doing that climate change, you know, crud, anymore,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins [a Trump sycophant with no climatological qualifications] told Fox Business on May 8…​

​

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/climate/trump-climate-denial.html​

​

Climate and environment updates:
Climate change adds month of extreme heat for 4 billion people

View attachment 1120482
"She called science 'crud!'
I like that!"



​

Define what a woman is Schmiddy…

 

[schmidlap]

Define what a woman is Schmiddy…

Your need for diversion is noted.