IS THIS TRUE? -- Report: FDA docs from FOIA request show over 1,200 COVID Vax deaths in the first 90 days.

[edthecynic]

The death rate for covid 19 is .28 of a percent. hardly earth shattering if .15 is killed by taking the vaccine that is getting close to the dead from having the disease.

Even though it was already posted that the Trumpcine might have a death rate of .0015% some lying scum CON$evvoFascist has to deliberately misrepresent both the covid death rate of 2% and the Trumpcine death rate to spew his shit!

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Even though it was already posted that the Trumpcine might have a death rate of .0015% some lying scum CON$evvoFascist has to deliberately misrepresent both the covid death rate of 2% and the Trumpcine death rate to spew his shit!

The death rate as I have repeatedly linked to is .28 of a percent. not 2 percent. Go ahead RETARD link to any reputable source that claims 2 percent.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Gateway Pundit?

If this is true, it would be a first, for them at least.

I noted the source and gave a warning.

I was asking if anyone could independently verify.

 

[dblack]

I noted the source and gave a warning.

Indeed. I was in no way casting dispersion on you.

I was asking if anyone could independently verify.

I couldn't find any. Did you?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Even though it was already posted that the Trumpcine might have a death rate of .0015% some lying scum CON$evvoFascist has to deliberately misrepresent both the covid death rate of 2% and the Trumpcine death rate to spew his shit!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I couldn't find any. Did you?

Not yet.

If that is true, it certainly is supported by the fact that vaccine manufacturers receive a 100% liability shield. They got that sweet deal back in the 80s, when they couldn't get any product liability insurance coverage. Nobody wanted to take on the risk, so they were going to stop manufacturing vaccines without government liability protection.

If this turns out to be the truth, this reveals, what... 3 levels of circular government causation covering several decades.

Complete insanity.


To Government:

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency - Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency

This nonprofit, made up of public health professionals, medical professionals, scientists, and journalists exists solely to obtain and disseminate the data

phmpt.org

Pretty good source right there.


Here is the link to the Pfizer documents:

Pfizer's Documents - Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency

Documents with a large file size are provided in a .zip file and will need to be uncompressed after download.

phmpt.org

 

[TNHarley]

Pretty good source right there.


Here is the link to the Pfizer documents:

Pfizer's Documents - Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency

Documents with a large file size are provided in a .zip file and will need to be uncompressed after download.

phmpt.org

It was interesting. I read some of the court documents but i couldnt make much sense of the pfizer documents.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The OP is once again FEAR MONGERING. 1,200 deaths in 90 days when the vast number of inoculations is not reported,

Fear mongering?

I was asking if the report was true. How is that fear mongering

But, I do note now you brush off 1,200 deaths. That is a ******* HUGE NUMBER, regardless of how many people get the jab.

 

[dblack]

Pretty good source right there.

It is? It's a list of doctor's names. At least we are to assume that they're doctors.

Here is the link to the Pfizer documents:

Pfizer's Documents - Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency

Documents with a large file size are provided in a .zip file and will need to be uncompressed after download.

phmpt.org

Yep. Read through those and saw no confirmation of anything matching the headline of the article.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Lets pretend that the GWP actually told the truth for the first time ever and that all 1200 deaths were due to the vaccine....

At the end of the first 90 days the US had given just at 80 million shots. That is a death rate of 0.0015%. If this same rate held for the US and we hit 100% vaccinated it would lead to a total of just over 5000 deaths.

During that same 90 days, 234,000 people died from COVID.

I am not sure how the death rate of 0.0015% stacks up against other vaccines, but I am betting it is pretty much in line with them all.

1,200 doesn't seem like a big number....unless someone you know was perfectly healthy before the jab, then died.

Thank about it this way. It presents a risk of death that some people want to mandate and force on others while Pfizer gets to make INSANE profits off of said mandate with ZERO liability.

Please tell me you see the real issue here.

 

[dblack]

Not yet.

If that is true, ...

These days, I usually stop right there. Get back to me when it IS true.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

These days, I usually stop right there. Get back to me when it IS true.

Fair enough.

I will meet you in the middle and get back to you when it is mandatory under government force while Pfizer et al get to make earth-shattering profits with ZERO liability.

Oh, wait....

 

[dblack]

Fair enough.

I will meet you in the middle and get back to you when it is mandatory under government force while Pfizer et al get to make earth-shattering profits with ZERO liability.

Not sure what you mean about meeting in the middle. I already oppose any and all government mandates of the vaccines.

 

[badger2]

Not yet.

If that is true, it certainly is supported by the fact that vaccine manufacturers receive a 100% liability shield. They got that sweet deal back in the 80s, when they couldn't get any product liability insurance coverage. Nobody wanted to take on the risk, so they were going to stop manufacturing vaccines without government liability protection.

If this turns out to be the truth, this reveals, what... 3 levels of circular government causation covering several decades.

Complete insanity.


To Government:

‘The 976 swine flu event was the first time that the federal government agreed to serve as pharma’s insurer. The episode taught the public an important lesson: tort immunity incentivizes dangerous and ineffective vaccines. Industry and the magisterial class learned an entirely different morale from the tragic episode. In 1986 they made swine flu vaccine template the model for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which shielded (all [italics]) mandated vaccines from liability.’
(Kennedy, The Real Anthony Fauci, p. 360)

 

[badger2]

1976 swine flu

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Not sure what you mean about meeting in the middle. I already oppose any and all government mandates of the vaccines.

What I am saying is who can afford to wait around for 10 years to confirm?

This exposes the huge flaw in our protections when the line between government and powerful private entities gets blurred.

 

[dblack]

What I am saying is who can afford to wait around for 10 years to confirm?

This exposes the huge flaw in our protections when the line between government and powerful private entities gets blurred.

Oh great - now you're leaning on that socialist republican perspective that certain private businesses (those republicans don't like) are acting on behalf of government, and should therefore be regulated, by government. I guess. I don't really follow the logic.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

1,200 doesn't seem like a big number....unless someone you know was perfectly healthy before the jab, then died.

And the "survival rate" that is always thrown around for COVID seems like a really big number until someone you know dies from it or has permanent damage from it. It always changes when it becomes personal.

Thank about it this way. It presents a risk of death that some people want to mandate and force on others while Pfizer gets to make INSANE profits off of said mandate with ZERO liability.

Please tell me you see the real issue here.

I am very much against Govt mandates even at the state or city level.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Oh great - no you're leaning on that socialist republican perspective that certain private businesses (those republicans don't like) are acting on behalf of government, and should therefore be regulated, by government. I guess. I don't really follow the logic.

No. I am not a Republican A/K/A socialist-lite.

What I am saying is that because government can easily hide behind the private sector, there is a flaw in individual liberty protections. Government has found a fool-proof round-about way to **** us over and blame it on the private sector, and there is no recourse.

What would you recommend as a solution (other than the complete demolition of the entire FedGov)?