Is this TOO MUCH TRUTH for the average Westerner?

Can you sum up what this fascist is saying OP?
Not watching the vid but I did see Putin's comments to a reporter about the new long-range missile thing. It basically was that Ukraine striking into Russia doesn't change anything because they are already doing it with drones. What does change things is that these missiles would have to be operated by NATO because the Ukrainians don't have the satellites and know how to use them, so they will have no choice but to respond against NATO as appropriate going forward once the long-range missiles are getting used. He did not specify what as appropriate would look like or threaten to attack NATO forces outside of Ukraine, but the implication was he wasn't ruling out the possibility either.
 
Not watching the vid but I did see Putin's comments to a reporter about the new long-range missile thing. It basically was that Ukraine striking into Russia doesn't change anything because they are already doing it with drones. What does change things is that these missiles would have to be operated by NATO because the Ukrainians don't have the satellites and know how to use them, so they will have no choice but to respond against NATO as appropriate going forward once the long-range missiles are getting used. He did not specify what as appropriate would look like or threaten to attack NATO forces outside of Ukraine, but the implication was he wasn't ruling out the possibility either.
Thank you for that summary.
 
Attacking any NATO country is a line that Putin will not cross. It would mean devastation for Russia.

Can we assume that Biden got this advice from adults in his administration? This is hardly the time to be making strategic changes in this conflict, with a new administration just a couple weeks away.
 
Attacking any NATO country is a line that Putin will not cross. It would mean devastation for Russia.

Can we assume that Biden got this advice from adults in his administration? This is hardly the time to be making strategic changes in this conflict, with a new administration just a couple weeks away.
Almost a given, since Imperial Russia called in tens of thousands of North Korean troops to attack Ukraine.
 
The problem is no leader of Ukraine can make a peace deal that doesn't involve a return to the 2014 borders. They'd be voted out of office.

Had Putin used diplomatic means to resolve the issues of Crimea and Donbas, that might have been feasible. Now, after so many people have died, not so much. The war will continue to drag on, and there's not much Trump can do about it.

And if he sells out a Democracy in favor of Putin's dictatorship, he'll be as reviled as Neville Chamberlain is today.
 
Attacking any NATO country is a line that Putin will not cross. It would mean devastation for Russia.

Can we assume that Biden got this advice from adults in his administration? This is hardly the time to be making strategic changes in this conflict, with a new administration just a couple weeks away.

Or maybe we should stop tying the hands of Ukraine. We give them weapons and then tell them they can't use them to the greatest strategic effect (i.e., taking out logistics in Russia itself.)
 
The war will continue to drag on, and there's not much Trump can do about it.

You are very wrong as usual.

Democrats are trying their best to get us into WWIII. Only useful idiots follow right along.
 
The only person I see escalating this conflict is Trump's Butt-Buddy Putin.

That is because you are misinformed. There is no need for the latest move by this administration. They would love nothing more than to keep this war going and to blame Trump for any escalation. They most certainly don't want to see him get credit for ending it. To Democrats, everything is political. The world be damned.

And I would love to know what Trump did to benefit Russia and Putin during his first term. Funny, I can list a few that Biden did.
 
That is because you are misinformed. There is no need for the latest move by this administration. They would love nothing more than to keep this war going and to blame Trump for any escalation. They most certainly don't want to see him get credit for ending it. To Democrats, everything is political. The world be damned.

And I would love to know what Trump did to benefit Russia and Putin during his first term. Funny, I can list a few that Biden did.

Pretty much turned over Syria to the Russians.
Ignored Russian Aggression in Ukraine, Georgia and Moldava
Tried to hold up weapons shipments to Ukraine until they dug up dirt on Hunter Biden (you know, the thing he was impeached for.)

Look, we know that Trump is determined to sell Ukraine down the river, but no reason to make it easy for him.
 
Attacking any NATO country is a line that Putin will not cross. It would mean devastation for Russia.

Can we assume that Biden got this advice from adults in his administration? This is hardly the time to be making strategic changes in this conflict, with a new administration just a couple weeks away.
It's a couple of months away. The question is: What difference does that make?
 
Attacking any NATO country is a line that Putin will not cross. It would mean devastation for Russia.

Can we assume that Biden got this advice from adults in his administration? This is hardly the time to be making strategic changes in this conflict, with a new administration just a couple weeks away.

Since Trump intends to betray Ukraine, it is the perfect time.

Give Ukraine a fighting chance before Derp fuhrer sells it out to his boss.
 
Since Trump intends to betray Ukraine, it is the perfect time.

Give Ukraine a fighting chance before Derp fuhrer sells it out to his boss.
Send your own boys home in body bags. It's OK with me.
 
Back
Top Bottom