Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
that's been my thought on the topicThis is meaningless. ASSUME that Cohen paid the Slut to be quiet, at Trump's request. Who cares? The legal theory of the case is that any expenditure that could conceivably have a political benefit must be treated as a campaign contribution. This legal theory is totally discredited. NOBODY IN U.S. HISTORY has ever been convicted on this basis. EVEN IF THEY GET A TOTALLY COMPROMISED NEW YORK JURY, the conviction would be quickly overturned on appeal. All Trump has to say is that he paid her to avoid embarrassing his wife. Case closed. No political intent.
It doesn't matter what Cohen says, or whether he is "credible" or whether he is legally competent. The underlying theory is nonsense and cannot fly.
“So, Mr. Cohen, we’re you lying then or are you lying now?”
Second, Government overreach? Are you kidding with that? Overreach is all you people know when it concerns Trump. Not one but two bogus impeachments, and now going after him post Presidency, while the country burns is the definition of overreach….
The only reason Trump didn't go to jail in 16 was he was elected. Arresting a sitting president is a near impossibility.Lastly, you DID go after Trump in 16 for this crap, it failed then, and will fail now….loser.
He has Trump on tape conspiring to pay hush money... he really doesn't need credibility, just to verify the tape is true.'....and while thinking about how to answer the question, are you planning to lie AGAIN?'
Likely the charge is not the payment to stormy, but instead, falsifying business records.This is meaningless. ASSUME that Cohen paid the Slut to be quiet, at Trump's request. Who cares? The legal theory of the case is that any expenditure that could conceivably have a political benefit must be treated as a campaign contribution. This legal theory is totally discredited. NOBODY IN U.S. HISTORY has ever been convicted on this basis. EVEN IF THEY GET A TOTALLY COMPROMISED NEW YORK JURY, the conviction would be quickly overturned on appeal. All Trump has to say is that he paid her to avoid embarrassing his wife. Case closed. No political intent.
It doesn't matter what Cohen says, or whether he is "credible" or whether he is legally competent. The underlying theory is nonsense and cannot fly.
I'm sorry. Does that have anything to do with you swallowing the lies your 'sources' have told you or ignoring the truth when it is posted right there for you to see? Or how you reject pictures of Trumps own statements making the OP a direct bullshit claim?Where's the crime, professor?
You do know that two other prosecutors have passed on this fart in the wind, don't you?
and God saysActually, they'd rapidly lose interest and find another Republican to demonize if he announced tomorrow that he's not running for president again. That's really what they're after because they're scared to death he would win and they would have to scream at the sky again.
Good thing this assumption is backed up by Trump himself then.DGS49 said:
ASSUME that Cohen paid the Slut to be quiet, at Trump's request.
Democrats want the case prosecuted based on this ASSUMPTON.
Too bad 'assumptions' not supported by evidence are mot allowed in court.
Doesn't matter, though.
Bragg has
- No Authority
- No Jurisdiction
- No Evidence
- No witness
- No case:
The statute of limitations has run out.
LOCAL DA attempting to prosecute a FEDERAL misdemeanor campaign finance violation - one the DOJ has refused to pursue, citing 'there is nothing to prosecute' - whose statute of limitations has run out.
And now Bragg has just been caught violating the 5th Amendment by withholding 600 pages of exculpatory evidence from the Grand Jury, which should (and usually would) result in his disbarrment.
What exculpatory evidence>
1) Trump had sex with Daniels.
2) He paid her to keep silent to prevent it from wrecking his campaign.
3) He then failed to disclose the payment on his campaign finance form.
None of these facts are really in dispute.
why hasn’t the FEC done anything?You realize that's irrelevant even if true, right? Trump is in legal hot water for not reporting it as a campaign contribution. So even had he not known initially, he did become aware at some point and was obligated to report it to the FEC.
Trump knew that even if you don't as evidenced by him trying to deny it was a campaign contribution. Now it appears a grand jury will make that decision.
If there is evidence trump is breaking the law, he needs to be prosecuted. Or do you not believe in the rule of law?
LOCAL DA attempting to prosecute a FEDERAL misdemeanor campaign finance violation - one the DOJ has refused to pursue, citing 'there is nothing to prosecute' - whose statute of limitations has run out.
And now Bragg has just been caught violating the 5th Amendment by withholding 600 pages of exculpatory evidence from the Grand Jury, which should (and usually would) result in his disbarrment.
Is that the only cope meme you know? Admittedly, Goodfellas is a great movie.'You've got him THIS time, snowflakes!'
View attachment 768584
This is likely about an illegal business transaction, not a campaign finance violation.
Another empty post from you where you can't support your own claims.
www.google.com
When the precedent is to use the legal system to destroy a political opponent, it's not a good precedent to set.
