Is this conclusive evidence that Trump is unfit for the Presidency?

[kyzr]

I've shot models, and that isn't a pose I would ever do. I'd expect a model to refuse a terrible shot, and they do, the good ones.
More proof you are a creep.

No, the real creep in this equation is you.

You traffic in innuendo. Here's what you are doing, this picture, according to the standard you are applying to Biden, if I apply the same bogus standard you are using, I could similarly declare that Trump is copping a feel on young Ivanka with his dick rubbing on her butt.

But, I don't do that kind of shit because my mind isn't in the gutter. Yours is. You have proved it many times on this forum. You are a creep.

1. You have no idea why the photographer wanted that pose. Melania did what she was hired to do. You're the British creep spewing nonsense on a US forum.

2. What's creepy about having sex with a beautiful woman with great abs? You and I have different perspectives, even if your're a Brit..

3. Why not give your interpretation of Pedo Joe in this photo? You insulted Melania with bullshit, here is a chance to show some real insight.

4. That photo of Trump and Ivanka shows nothing bad. Biden is the one who gets a "hard on" around young girls and his daughter.

 

[BrokeLoser]

"If Ivanka weren't my daughter I'd be dating her" ---Donald Trump

Yeah, taste in women. Got it.

Here's the first whore, I mean 'lady'.

View attachment 787824


Now I don't have anything against nudity. But, when you put your hand over your private parts, you are saying there is something wrong with nudity, so, that is why I object to her photo. You could have posed to hide them, where the hiding seems natural, but her pose is horrific unnatural. (The blackouts are for the rules of the forum) Besides, there are far more artistic poses than a full frontal shot like this. I was a pro photographer for many years, and this shot, in my professional opinion, makes her look cheap.

I'm calling her a 'whore' not for this shot, but for her gold digging. No way in hell would she have married Trump but for his being a rich tycoon.

Hahaha….and just like that the twisted and confused immoral as fuck left hates sexual deviants.
Hahahaha!

 

[easyt65]

In my view, it is inescapable, incontrovertible, unassailable, 100% positive proof that Trump is unfit for the office of the Presidency:

Of course, because you are a fragile, easily-offended, Trump-obsessed, TDS-suffering snowflake who has been pushing the Hillary Hoax for the last 7 years.

,It's as if Trump has been watching too many John Wayne movies, he's a mad man drunk on power.

if you had been paying attention to TRUMP during his FIRST 4 years (instead of all the failed Democrat scandals and coup attempts) you would have noticed this brash, 'no bullshit'-talking, John Wayne-esque, 'mad man' persona prevented our enemies from being sure what he might do and thus pretty much kept them in check.

Democrats / Snowflakes have proven they have no sense of humor and can't tell when he is making a joke or playing them.

They can't tell when he is bluffing / playing tough ... nor did our enemies, which is a good thing.

The easily-offended, 'duped by Hillary Peepee tapes' crowd ate so easily offended, as you just demonstrated.

Poor snowflakes.

 

[wamose]

You don't think ol' Rumpole is going to let a little firecracker like that one go unlit, eh? Hah!

When President Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Singapore in June 2018 and later in Vietnam in February 2019, it marked the first-ever meeting between a sitting US president and a North Korean leader. The event was highly controversial and garnered a wide range of opinions from the diplomatic corps, the military, western leaders, and politicians.

Some saw the meetings as a positive step toward diplomacy and a potential path to deescalating tensions in the Korean Peninsula. Advocates for diplomacy argued that engaging in direct dialogue with Kim Jong Un could pave the way for better relations, reducing the risk of conflict, and potentially leading to denuclearization.

However, others criticized the meetings and the photo-ops, arguing that they legitimized Kim Jong Un's regime without any tangible progress on denuclearization or human rights issues. Critics contended that the meetings and the resulting images elevated North Korea's status on the world stage without securing any meaningful concessions or commitments from the regime.

In the diplomatic corps and among western leaders, opinions were also divided. Some appreciated the unconventional approach taken by President Trump, hoping that it could lead to breakthroughs in the longstanding impasse between the US and North Korea. Others were more skeptical, expressing concerns about the lack of preparation, the absence of clear objectives, and the potential for the meetings to be exploited for propaganda purposes by North Korea.

The military establishment, too, had a range of opinions. Some military leaders and experts acknowledged the potential benefits of diplomacy, while others expressed concerns about the potential consequences of engaging with a regime that has a history of violating agreements and pursuing nuclear weapons development

And what did Trump achieve?

1 Legitimization of his regime internationally, by meeting with and being the object of lavish praise by the president of the United States;

2 An unexpected and long-sought freeze on U.S.-South Korea joint exercises announced by President Trump, with the additional virtue of dividing the United States from South Korea and Japan, who were blindsided by the announcement;

3 A suggestion by President Trump that U.S. strategic bombers based in Guam should not conduct exercises in Korea, an important step toward affirming Pyongyang’s definition of denuclearization of the entire Korean peninsula;

4 A denunciation of U.S.-South Korea exercises by President Trump as provocative;

5 A summit that is sure to greatly accelerate the process of erosion of sanctions against North Korea, first by China, Russia, and South Korea, and inevitably by others to follow;

6 A promise from President Trump to invite Kim Jong-un to the White House;

7 The stated desire of President Trump to withdraw all U.S. forces from South Korea;

8 A U.S. commitment to provide security guarantees to North Korea; and

9 A mortal blow to the U.S. ability to either increase sanctions or threaten use of force for the foreseeable future

I, and a number of the members of the Diplomatic Corp, Western Leaders and the Military agree with yours truly. But, yes, opinions are divided, but I doubt sincerely it's a 'small number' and that 'I'm the only one'.

Your giddy tone reminds me of when Rachel Maddow found Trump's tax returns and thought it was going to be a game changer, alarmist that she is.

 

[Rumpole]

Your giddy tone reminds me of when Rachel Maddow found Trump's tax returns and thought it was going to be a game changer, alarmist that she is.

Now I know you have no credibility. And my recollection is that I saw every episode in that time, and nothing she said was about the two tax forms sent to her anonymously would be a 'game changer', that's your spin and it's not honest.

 

[Rumpole]

Of course, because you are a fragile, easily-offended, Trump-obsessed, TDS-suffering snowflake who has been pushing the Hillary Hoax for the last 7 years.

Weasel words have no argumentative value, comment dismissed.

if you had been paying attention to TRUMP during his FIRST 4 years (instead of all the failed Democrat scandals and coup attempts)

Well if you were paying attention then you must be hallucinating. The only coup was the one on Jan 6 by Trump.

you would have noticed this brash, 'no bullshit'-talking, John Wayne-esque, 'mad man' persona prevented our enemies from being sure what he might do and thus pretty much kept them in check.

Well, clearly, you are joking. Trump was regarded as a clown by other leaders. This idea he 'prevented a war' is absurd. Even if there were no war, he still did the following, which, compared to other recent presidents, is about the same, give or take:

1. Operation Inherent Resolve: This operation aimed to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. It began under President Obama but continued throughout Trump's presidency, with the objective of reducing ISIS's territorial control and degrading its capabilities.
2. Operation Freedom's Sentinel: Trump maintained the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan as part of this operation. It focused on counterterrorism efforts, training Afghan forces, and supporting the Afghan government's stabilization efforts.
3. Tomahawk missile strikes in Syria: In response to the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government, Trump ordered missile strikes on Syrian government targets in 2017 and 2018. These strikes were limited in scope and intended to deter the use of chemical weapons.
4. Airstrikes in Yemen: Trump authorized several airstrikes in Yemen against Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). These strikes aimed to degrade AQAP's capabilities and disrupt its operations.

More:

1. Operation Yukon Journey: This operation involved deploying U.S. forces to Cameroon to assist in countering the extremist group Boko Haram.
2. Operation Octave Shield: Trump authorized the deployment of additional troops to the Horn of Africa region to support the fight against terrorism and provide assistance to regional partners.
3. Airstrikes in Somalia: The United States conducted airstrikes in Somalia as part of efforts to combat Al-Shabaab, an extremist group operating in the country.
4. Operation Freedom's Sentinel - Somalia: This operation focused on providing assistance to Somali forces and conducting counterterrorism operations against Al-Shabaab and ISIS affiliates in Somalia.
5. Operation Sentinel: Following attacks on oil tankers in the Persian Gulf, the United States deployed additional military forces to the region to enhance security and deter potential threats.
6. Airstrikes in Iraq: Trump ordered targeted airstrikes in Iraq against ISIS targets, particularly in response to attacks by the group on Iraqi security forces.
7. Operation Sentinel Support: This operation involved providing support to Saudi Arabia in countering regional threats, including assistance with air and missile defense capabilities.
8. Operation Sentinel Convoy: Trump authorized the deployment of additional U.S. forces to Saudi Arabia to enhance defensive capabilities and support Saudi Arabia's defense against regional threats.

In other words, comparable to other presidents, noting that Obama did not start a war, either.

Democrats / Snowflakes have proven they have no sense of humor and can't tell when he is making a joke or playing them.

That's rich given that the vast majority comedians are liberal and not republicans, and the only one I can think of, Dennis Miller, a rightie, is not funny. The 5 on Fox were stupid.

They can't tell when he is bluffing / playing tough ... nor did our enemies, which is a good thing.

The regarded him a petulant, erratic, clown, which is a bad thing, a very bad thing.

The easily-offended, 'duped by Hillary Peepee tapes' crowd ate so easily offended, as you just demonstrated.

Poor snowflakes.

Weasel words have no argumentative value.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

"If Ivanka weren't my daughter I'd be dating her" ---Donald Trump

Yeah, taste in women. Got it.

Here's the first whore, I mean 'lady'.

View attachment 787824


Now I don't have anything against nudity. But, when you put your hand over your private parts, you are saying there is something wrong with nudity, so, that is why I object to her photo. You could have posed to hide them, where the hiding seems natural, but her pose is horrific unnatural. (The blackouts are for the rules of the forum) Besides, there are far more artistic poses than a full frontal shot like this. I was a pro photographer for many years, and this shot, in my professional opinion, makes her look cheap.

I'm calling her a 'whore' not for this shot, but for her gold digging. No way in hell would she have married Trump but for his being a rich tycoon.

You're just a prude faggot

 

[Rumpole]

Sure you have. One thing you progbots all have in common is you are prolific liars.

Given the firehose delivery of lies by Trump, your fake outrage is noted.

 

[westwall]

Given the firehose delivery of lies by Trump, your fake outrage is noted.

Oh, a non sequitur whataboutism, how infantile.

 

[bripat9643]

Given the firehose delivery of lies by Trump, your fake outrage is noted.

You seem to be the biggest firehose of lies around here.

 

[Rumpole]

Oh, a non sequitur whataboutism, how infantile.

No, the reference proves fake outrage, assuming you are a Trump defender, which you are, and thus is relevant to the OP.

Clearly, you do not understand what 'non sequitur' actually means.

 

[hadit]

In my view, it is inescapable, incontrovertible, unassailable, 100% positive proof that Trump is unfit for the office of the Presidency:

Behold his statements made before the United Nations.

What he said no competent leader would ever say. It is totally irresponsible and dangerous.

That is my heartfelt opinion, now see if you don't agree

"...we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea" --Donald Trump




,It's as if Trump has been watching too many John Wayne movies, he's a mad man drunk on power.

WTF?

Am I right?

Here's a hint, don't vote for him.

 

[Rumpole]

Here's a hint, don't vote for him.

Here's a hint, that's not the point.

On the strong chance you are stupid, PM me and I will gladly explain it to you.

 

[hadit]

Here's a hint, that's not the point.

In the strong chance you are stupid, PM me and I will gladly explain it to you.

I get it, you're afraid too many people will not listen to you and Quid Pro will be sent into retirement. You're literally afraid TRUMP! will win again, so you're doing everything you can to convince people not to vote for him. Well, I'm helping you. If you hate him so irrationally, don't vote for him. That'll be one less vote and may tip the scales in a miniscule way.

 

[bripat9643]

Here's a hint, that's not the point.

On the strong chance you are stupid, PM me and I will gladly explain it to you.

What is the point, dumbass?

 

[westwall]

No, the reference proves fake outrage, assuming you are a Trump defender, which you are, and thus is relevant to the OP.

Clearly, you do not understand what 'non sequitur' actually means.

No, you resort to the very behavior you claim to be above, thus you are proven to be yet another vacuous promotion, spewing the talking points your masters assigned you.

GIGO

 

[Rumpole]

No, you resort to the very behavior you claim to be above, thus you are proven to be yet another vacuous promotion, spewing the talking points your masters assigned you.

GIGO

Spoken like a true RWNJ.

Now pester someone else.

 

[Rumpole]

I get it, you're afraid too many people will not listen to you and Quid Pro will be sent into retirement. You're literally afraid TRUMP! will win again, so you're doing everything you can to convince people not to vote for him. Well, I'm helping you. If you hate him so irrationally, don't vote for him. That'll be one less vote and may tip the scales in a miniscule way.

Everyone who is concerned about the preservation of democracy should be concern about the possibility Trump could win.

That's rational and just.

No, I do not 'hate' trump 'irrationally'.

The following is rational:

I hold him in utter contempt for many reasons, but not limited to.....

Trump is a sex abuser, conman, fraudster, criminal
who loves Putin, the 'poorly educated', not to mention
that he despises democracy and has betrayed America

Trump org, indicted
Trump CFO, in prison
Trump campaign mgr., convicted.
Trump, 34 felony counts in NYC
Trump, sued for $250 million in NY.
Trump, found liable for sex abuse and defamation, must pay $5 million
Trump, being investigated for obstruction relating to the theft of national defense information documents
Trump, being investigated for election fraud in GA
Trump, being investigation for crimes related to Jan 6 attack, Jan 6 attempt to overturn the election by delaying the joint session fo congress.
Trump, settled for $25 million having scammed thousands out of millions in a fake university scam
Trump, fornicated with a porn star just after his newly wed wife gave birth and threw his long time dedicated lawyer under the bus.
Trump charity, shut down for 'illegal activity' Trump fined $2 million.

Got it?

 

[westwall]

Spoken like a true RWNJ.

Now pester someone else.

Piss off.

 

[westwall]

Everyone who is concerned about the preservation of democracy should be concern about the possibility Trump could win.

That's rational and just.

No, I do not 'hate' trump 'irrationally'.

The following is rational:

I hold him in utter contempt for many reasons, but not limited to.....

Trump is a sex abuser, conman, fraudster, criminal
who loves Putin, the 'poorly educated', not to mention
that he despises democracy and has betrayed America

Trump org, indicted
Trump CFO, in prison
Trump campaign mgr., convicted.
Trump, 34 felony counts in NYC
Trump, sued for $250 million in NY.
Trump, found liable for sex abuse and defamation, must pay $5 million
Trump, being investigated for obstruction relating to the theft of national defense information documents
Trump, being investigated for election fraud in GA
Trump, being investigation for crimes related to Jan 6 attack, Jan 6 attempt to overturn the election by delaying the joint session fo congress.
Trump, settled for $25 million having scammed thousands out of millions in a fake university scam
Trump, fornicated with a porn star just after his newly wed wife gave birth and threw his long time dedicated lawyer under the bus.
Trump charity, shut down for 'illegal activity' Trump fined $2 million.

Got it?

Corrupt as hell DOJ manufacturing crimes to try and bring him down. You fuckers don't get it, we KNOW the allegations are bullshit.

So, go piss up a rope you fucking bootlicker.