Is there any USMB member who believes all deported Tren de Aragua members be returned to the US?

[Rawley]

It was STULL voluntary stupid… even if the immigrants didn’t understand what was happening

Christ you’re stupid. Read it again. All of it

Backatcha Forrest. "Returns" are voluntary. The process Obama and Biden used is "expedited removal " 40% of the millions they deported were deported under "expedited removal." No hearing, no judge.

 

[Mac-7]

served his time? I thought he turned down the pardon.

Arpaio never did time

 

[Leo123]

Of course Biden and Obama did. Mostly of actual criminals.

And still you claimed they were not… at the time

So, you learned nothing?

 

[Seymour Flops]

It was STULL voluntary stupid… even if the immigrants didn’t understand what was happening

Christ you’re stupid. Read it again. All of it

Probably the most moronic thing I’ve read on this board. It was voluntary, even if they didn’t understand what was happening?

It wasn’t at all voluntary, whether they understood it or not. But I don’t expect you to ever admit you’re wrong.

 

[Ace Nova]

entering the US other than a port of entry is a civil offense, not a criminal one.

.

That's not necessarily true. Although it can be a civil offense - they can also be charged criminally, ordered to pay fines or worse...

While immigration violations are considered civil offenses, §§ 1325 and 1326 are misdemeanor and felony violations, respectively, in the criminal context. Under federal law, people who enter or reenter the United States without authorization are subject not only to civil immigration detention and deportation proceedings but also to criminal sanctions. In other words, after being charged with § 1326, for example, an individual with prior convictions could be put in federal prison for up to a 20-year sentence. After completing their sentence, these individuals are often picked up by ICE, and subsequently deported for the same crime.

Unauthorized Entry & Re-entry Prosecutions

nipnlg.org

 

[Contumacious]

That doesn't make any sense, idiot. I didn't declare them to be or not to be gang members. Your cultism has turned your brains to diarrhea.

By the way, you only think they are all gang members because the fat rapist said so.[/quote}


Yo Dingle Berry , you just declared them wrongly accused .

Fuck you now

 

[Lesh]

Probably the most moronic thing I’ve read on this board. It was voluntary, even if they didn’t understand what was happening?

It wasn’t at all voluntary, whether they understood it or not. But I don’t expect you to ever admit you’re wrong.

Read your own link stupid.

And then look up the word voluntary

That word is in that link

 

[Contumacious]

Probably the most moronic thing I’ve read on this board. It was voluntary, even if they didn’t understand what was happening?

It wasn’t at all voluntary, whether they understood it or not. But I don’t expect you to ever admit you’re wrong.

WE THE PEOPLE MANDATED THAT THE BIDEN JUNTA'S ILLEGALS BE REPATRIATED .

I understood it , that's enough.

 

[Lesh]

That's not necessarily true. Although it can be a civil offense - they can also be charged criminally, ordered to pay fines or worse...

While immigration violations are considered civil offenses, §§ 1325 and 1326 are misdemeanor and felony violations, respectively, in the criminal context. Under federal law, people who enter or reenter the United States without authorization are subject not only to civil immigration detention and deportation proceedings but also to criminal sanctions. In other words, after being charged with § 1326, for example, an individual with prior convictions could be put in federal prison for up to a 20-year sentence. After completing their sentence, these individuals are often picked up by ICE, and subsequently deported for the same crime.

Unauthorized Entry & Re-entry Prosecutions

nipnlg.org

What’s your point? Re-entry can be considered a criminal offense. First time offense is civil

 

[Seymour Flops]

Read your own link stupid.

And then look up the word voluntary

That word is in that link

And that is all you read. Because you're a moron.

Further down, you would have seen this:

But starting in 2005, the Department of Homeland Security increased use of a second procedure known as “expedited removal.” This is a formal process, in which the deportee never sees a judge, but the removal still goes on his or her permanent record. That’s a big deal, because it can trigger much harsher penalties if that person ever tries to enter the country again.

Not voluntary.

 

[playtime]

That's not necessarily true. Although it can be a civil offense - they can also be charged criminally, ordered to pay fines or worse...

While immigration violations are considered civil offenses, §§ 1325 and 1326 are misdemeanor and felony violations, respectively, in the criminal context. Under federal law, people who enter or reenter the United States without authorization are subject not only to civil immigration detention and deportation proceedings but also to criminal sanctions. In other words, after being charged with § 1326, for example, an individual with prior convictions could be put in federal prison for up to a 20-year sentence. After completing their sentence, these individuals are often picked up by ICE, and subsequently deported for the same crime.

Unauthorized Entry & Re-entry Prosecutions

nipnlg.org

if they have committed a crime separate from entry 'unlawfully', & rightfully so.

 

[Ace Nova]

What’s your point? Re-entry can be considered a criminal offense. First time offense is civil

Again, that is not always the case.

First Punishment for Crossing Border Illegally​

When a person is caught illegally crossing the border—lawfully known as an improper entry—the first offense may include:

• Civil penalty fine of $50 to $250
• Imprisonment for up to six months (Criminal)
• Both fines and imprisonment

Is Illegal Immigration a Felony? US Illegal Entry Penalties

Illegally crossing the border into the United States is a crime. Search for Immigration Lawyer representation if you or a Loved one needs help. Call Today

www.lawfirm1.com

 

[Contumacious]

And that is all you read. Because you're a moron.

Further down, you would have seen this:

But starting in 2005, the Department of Homeland Security increased use of a second procedure known as “expedited removal.” This is a formal process, in which the deportee never sees a judge, but the removal still goes on his or her permanent record. That’s a big deal, because it can trigger much harsher penalties if that person ever tries to enter the country again.

Not voluntary.

I VOLUNTARILY gave President Trump the MANDATE to IMMEDIATELY repatriate the over 15,000,000 illegals

 

[Lesh]

Backatcha Forrest. "Returns" are voluntary. The process Obama and Biden used is "expedited removal " 40% of the millions they deported were deported under "expedited removal." No hearing, no judge.

There was no hearing because according to your link, the illegals agreed to deportation

 

[Rawley]

Read your own link stupid.

And then look up the word voluntary

That word is in that link

Second, and last time. "returns" are voluntary. We are not talking about "returns" we are talking about the hundreds of thousands of illegals deported by Obama and Biden under "expedited removal" No hearing, no judge.

The Biden administration used expedited removal more than 193,000 times to deport migrants along the border in the last fiscal year. That was the most since at least 2014, when Obama used it nearly 188,000 times.

MSN

 

[Contumacious]

There was no hearing because according to your link, the illegals agreed to deportation

There was no hearing because the Biden Junta allowed over 15,000,000 illegals into our country - he gamed the system the illegals pay the consequences !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Lesh]

If they are legal residents? Not without good cause.

Pretty much what I said. Thank you for the clarification

 

[JoeB131]

Let's see our staunch Democrat supporters stand up and be counted. Who agrees with Jamie Raskin? Should the deported Tren de Aragua gang members be brought back into the US or not?

If they were adjudicated to have committed crimes, I would be the first one for deporting them.

The problem is, this little thing called "Due Proces of Law".

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

I think they should throw them in a pit and release 1,000's of killer bees on them.

 

[Rambunctious]

A hearing isn’t a trial and yes some costs are incurred, but that protects everyone. We don’t want due process thrown out as a cost saving measure. The determination should be made if they’re here legally or not and whether they’re actually gang members.

You find me the law or rule that says millions of illegals are entitled to a hearing in front of a judge....