Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I've noticed that the Republican party has schisms and arguments within their own party quite often, and the Democrats exploit that and say "they're at war with each other, they're unorganized, they are falling apart!"
In my opinion, that's the sign of a healthy party (although I despise most of the Republican party anyway lol, so I should say "healthier party" instead of "healthy"), whereas a party that has no large divisions within itself appears to be more like a "programmed" or "robotic" party that accepts everything their leadership says as absolute.
No it makes sense to most people and is a legitimate tactic --- the problem is that most people interpret it that way and don't realize the hive thinking is the most dangerous thinking.
There is no such thing as a hive mind in either party.
It's a hive mind thing. They silently disagree in certain areas, but if you group them together, you get the democrat model - Group Think.
That is not hive mind, you idiot. It's the exact same thing with the republicans... they disagree on things and compete within but THEY ARE A PARTY, and when it comes to national goals their party is operated as a single entity.
EXACTLY the same with republicans.
I've noticed that the Republican party has schisms and arguments within their own party quite often, and the Democrats exploit that and say "they're at war with each other, they're unorganized, they are falling apart!"
In my opinion, that's the sign of a healthy party (although I despise most of the Republican party anyway lol, so I should say "healthier party" instead of "healthy"), whereas a party that has no large divisions within itself appears to be more like a "programmed" or "robotic" party that accepts everything their leadership says as absolute.
Its a party of collectivists being collective. Add in the fact the media is mostly Democratic in nature, and you have people that, once a policy is set, fall into lockstep on it, and any minor squabbling is convinently ignored by most of the media.
While social conservatives may fall into line once a decsion is made, liberatrians are by nature a bunch of ornery disagreeing individuals.
to this day you fools defend Bush and LIE about the very facts to protect him
I've noticed that the Republican party has schisms and arguments within their own party quite often, and the Democrats exploit that and say "they're at war with each other, they're unorganized, they are falling apart!"
In my opinion, that's the sign of a healthy party (although I despise most of the Republican party anyway lol, so I should say "healthier party" instead of "healthy"), whereas a party that has no large divisions within itself appears to be more like a "programmed" or "robotic" party that accepts everything their leadership says as absolute.
Divide and conquer. Democrats try not to show weakness or fracturing because it makes them look more like the "solid" party. They can then exploit that by telling your average Republican citizen, "Look, your party is falling apart! Join us, we don't have these problems!" It's basic warfare: You puff yourself up to look bigger than the other guy.
Republicans have gotten a bad rap lately - much of it is justified, much of it isn't - and I'm certain that strain wears on you, if only on a subconscious level. By looking bigger and "better" (I use that term highly subjectively), the Democrats can get a bigger vote.
Or I'm crazy.
They like "democracy", as we so often hear about from them and how great it is. They adore larger protection rackets and wealth confiscation (government) because they are scared of being individuals or just do not have the mental fortitude to actually be an individual.
They like "democracy", as we so often hear about from them and how great it is. They adore larger protection rackets and wealth confiscation (government) because they are scared of being individuals or just do not have the mental fortitude to actually be an individual.
Since when is being an individual the ultimate good? There's a time for individualism and a time for collective action. It's the total disregard and vilification of collective action that's the philosophical downfall of libertarianism.
I've noticed that the Republican party has schisms and arguments within their own party quite often, and the Democrats exploit that and say "they're at war with each other, they're unorganized, they are falling apart!"
In my opinion, that's the sign of a healthy party (although I despise most of the Republican party anyway lol, so I should say "healthier party" instead of "healthy"), whereas a party that has no large divisions within itself appears to be more like a "programmed" or "robotic" party that accepts everything their leadership says as absolute.
I've noticed that the Republican party has schisms and arguments within their own party quite often, and the Democrats exploit that and say "they're at war with each other, they're unorganized, they are falling apart!"
In my opinion, that's the sign of a healthy party (although I despise most of the Republican party anyway lol, so I should say "healthier party" instead of "healthy"), whereas a party that has no large divisions within itself appears to be more like a "programmed" or "robotic" party that accepts everything their leadership says as absolute.
its the pee wee defense
I've noticed that the Republican party has schisms and arguments within their own party quite often, and the Democrats exploit that and say "they're at war with each other, they're unorganized, they are falling apart!"
In my opinion, that's the sign of a healthy party (although I despise most of the Republican party anyway lol, so I should say "healthier party" instead of "healthy"), whereas a party that has no large divisions within itself appears to be more like a "programmed" or "robotic" party that accepts everything their leadership says as absolute.
I've noticed that the Republican party has schisms and arguments within their own party quite often, and the Democrats exploit that and say "they're at war with each other, they're unorganized, they are falling apart!"
In my opinion, that's the sign of a healthy party (although I despise most of the Republican party anyway lol, so I should say "healthier party" instead of "healthy"), whereas a party that has no large divisions within itself appears to be more like a "programmed" or "robotic" party that accepts everything their leadership says as absolute.
