oldsoul
Gold Member
Simple question. State your case and discuss if you wish.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe it should be revolted and a new un conservative nation established.
Simple question. State your case and discuss if you wish.
Not anticipating partisan political parties was the Constitution's biggest omission. Otherwise it was brilliant.
We need a Constitutional Convention to restore its original intentions and defend it against "activist" judges.
The correct question should be: should we allow our Constitutional Republic to be destroyed.Simple question. State your case and discuss if you wish.
The correct question should be: should we allow our Constitutional Republic to be destroyed.Simple question. State your case and discuss if you wish.
The glaring, and momentous, mistake on the part of the Founders, was the Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts) Branch of the government.
Before any excuse for the error is mounted , it should be noted that the Constitution does not provide for what is called ‘judicial review,’ nor is the concept found in English law.
The correct question should be: should we allow our Constitutional Republic to be destroyed.Simple question. State your case and discuss if you wish.
Unfortunately its destruction is imminent the consequence of the bane of conservativism.
We can only hope that a future generation will re-establish the Republic.
The glaring, and momentous, mistake on the part of the Founders, was the Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts) Branch of the government.
Before any excuse for the error is mounted , it should be noted that the Constitution does not provide for what is called ‘judicial review,’ nor is the concept found in English law.
How else could Constitutional violations be enforced?
Not anticipating partisan political parties was the Constitution's biggest omission. Otherwise it was brilliant.
We need a Constitutional Convention to restore its original intentions and defend it against "activist" judges.
While I do not support a convention to alter the Constitution, you are spot on about judges.
1.The glaring, and momentous, mistake on the part of the Founders, was the Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts) Branch of the government.
Before any excuse for the error is mounted , it should be noted that the Constitution does not provide for what is called ‘judicial review,’ nor is the concept found in English law.