Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
no--it's not the sameSame dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
no--it's not the sameSame dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Do you drive? 40k die in auto accidents every year. Every life is precious but we aren't lowering the speed limit to 25MPH on every road. Life comes with risks.So far, we have had had 8,452 Deaths in this country and rising. So you question,Is that worth 8, 452,000+ missing work until they can get this somewhat under control? I say, Hell yes. What is wrong with you?I say no. One person dying is a singular event. One thousand people losing their jobs has lasting repercussions. What say you?
Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
You know you are responding to something I posted on April 4th" Back then, 8,452 US deaths were not enough to sound serious to you? Today is April 14th. Now we are at 23,644 dead. 25 MPH is fine with me while we are almost tripling the number dead in the last 10 days. Do not listen to the Furor. Trump is a mad man. Look to the future, but do it with rationality. Do not listen to trump the science hater and would be ("I am in total control") DICTATOR.Do you drive? 40k die in auto accidents every year. Every life is precious but we aren't lowering the speed limit to 25MPH on every road. Life comes with risks.So far, we have had had 8,452 Deaths in this country and rising. So you question,Is that worth 8, 452,000+ missing work until they can get this somewhat under control? I say, Hell yes. What is wrong with you?I say no. One person dying is a singular event. One thousand people losing their jobs has lasting repercussions. What say you?
If you're a Chef, tough to find employment. The OP believes death is certain but it is not.Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
And, for what it is worth. . . Un-employment is no more no less certain than death is, in this exercise. The difference is, we can find other employment. However, the chances of that are a lot better if you are alive.
You know you are responding to something I posted on April 4th" Back then, 8,452 US deaths were not enough to sound serious to you? Today is April 14th. Now we are at 23,644 dead. 25 MPH is fine with me while we are almost tripling the number dead in the last 10 days. Do not listen to the Furor. Trump is a mad man. Look to the future, but do it with rationality. Do not listen to trump the science hater and would be ("I am in total control") DICTATOR.Do you drive? 40k die in auto accidents every year. Every life is precious but we aren't lowering the speed limit to 25MPH on every road. Life comes with risks.So far, we have had had 8,452 Deaths in this country and rising. So you question,Is that worth 8, 452,000+ missing work until they can get this somewhat under control? I say, Hell yes. What is wrong with you?I say no. One person dying is a singular event. One thousand people losing their jobs has lasting repercussions. What say you?
If you're a Chef, tough to find employment. The OP believes death is certain but it is not.Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
And, for what it is worth. . . Un-employment is no more no less certain than death is, in this exercise. The difference is, we can find other employment. However, the chances of that are a lot better if you are alive.
Sure but the question is when not if. Cannot have the world shut down for 18 mos.If you're a Chef, tough to find employment. The OP believes death is certain but it is not.Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
And, for what it is worth. . . Un-employment is no more no less certain than death is, in this exercise. The difference is, we can find other employment. However, the chances of that are a lot better if you are alive.
Few things in life are certain and deserve to be treated as such.
Taxes and Death are two of them.
Sure but the question is when not if. Cannot have the world shut down for 18 mos.If you're a Chef, tough to find employment. The OP believes death is certain but it is not.Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
And, for what it is worth. . . Un-employment is no more no less certain than death is, in this exercise. The difference is, we can find other employment. However, the chances of that are a lot better if you are alive.
Few things in life are certain and deserve to be treated as such.
Taxes and Death are two of them.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
Yes and yes. But we have to accept some death toll when we return to normalcy.Sure but the question is when not if. Cannot have the world shut down for 18 mos.If you're a Chef, tough to find employment. The OP believes death is certain but it is not.Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
And, for what it is worth. . . Un-employment is no more no less certain than death is, in this exercise. The difference is, we can find other employment. However, the chances of that are a lot better if you are alive.
Few things in life are certain and deserve to be treated as such.
Taxes and Death are two of them.
This pandemic pales in comparison to our nation's past hardships. The world's hardships, for that matter. I think we both agree that there is a balancing that becomes necessary at some point. However, I do not agree in over simplifications, such as the OP.
Yes and yes. But we have to accept some death toll when we return to normalcy.Sure but the question is when not if. Cannot have the world shut down for 18 mos.If you're a Chef, tough to find employment. The OP believes death is certain but it is not.Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
And, for what it is worth. . . Un-employment is no more no less certain than death is, in this exercise. The difference is, we can find other employment. However, the chances of that are a lot better if you are alive.
Few things in life are certain and deserve to be treated as such.
Taxes and Death are two of them.
This pandemic pales in comparison to our nation's past hardships. The world's hardships, for that matter. I think we both agree that there is a balancing that becomes necessary at some point. However, I do not agree in over simplifications, such as the OP.
How about isolation, no school for children, no professional or amateur sports, no going out to eat, no family gatherings? It is not just "discomfort". It is a jail sentence. Question is when is the sentence lifted.Yes and yes. But we have to accept some death toll when we return to normalcy.Sure but the question is when not if. Cannot have the world shut down for 18 mos.If you're a Chef, tough to find employment. The OP believes death is certain but it is not.Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
And, for what it is worth. . . Un-employment is no more no less certain than death is, in this exercise. The difference is, we can find other employment. However, the chances of that are a lot better if you are alive.
Few things in life are certain and deserve to be treated as such.
Taxes and Death are two of them.
This pandemic pales in comparison to our nation's past hardships. The world's hardships, for that matter. I think we both agree that there is a balancing that becomes necessary at some point. However, I do not agree in over simplifications, such as the OP.
Death is, has been and always will be a part of "normalcy."
So to is un-employment and discomfort.
The government can give whatever green light they want to re-open the economy and STILL it will only open where it can and when it can. Jobs will still be lost and people will still be dying .
It defies simplification.
How about isolation, no school for children, no professional or amateur sports, no going out to eat, no family gatherings? It is not just "discomfort". It is a jail sentence. Question is when is the sentence lifted.Yes and yes. But we have to accept some death toll when we return to normalcy.Sure but the question is when not if. Cannot have the world shut down for 18 mos.If you're a Chef, tough to find employment. The OP believes death is certain but it is not.Same dilemma posed in the form of a question.
Are you willing to die so that 1000 people MIGHT be able to keep their jobs?
Wrong question.
Are you willing to risk death so that 1000 people would keep their jobs. I would. Death is not certain.
The question in the OP was "Is preventing one Corona death worth 1,000 people losing their jobs?"
In that question, DEATH is being presented as though it is fairly certain.
And, for what it is worth. . . Un-employment is no more no less certain than death is, in this exercise. The difference is, we can find other employment. However, the chances of that are a lot better if you are alive.
Few things in life are certain and deserve to be treated as such.
Taxes and Death are two of them.
This pandemic pales in comparison to our nation's past hardships. The world's hardships, for that matter. I think we both agree that there is a balancing that becomes necessary at some point. However, I do not agree in over simplifications, such as the OP.
Death is, has been and always will be a part of "normalcy."
So to is un-employment and discomfort.
The government can give whatever green light they want to re-open the economy and STILL it will only open where it can and when it can. Jobs will still be lost and people will still be dying .
It defies simplification.
If it were not for the coronavirus would we have immortality? Most of the people who died were dying. They had serious and terminal diseases. They would not be hale and healthy. The second most number of dead of the virus had underlying disease. Doctors now say obesity and diabetes were secondary causes of death. Last night the news had proof that corona attacked the young. A 20something nursing student died. Her picture was of a pretty blonde that was morbidly obese.
We cannot have the sacrifice of the economy to save lives. The same way the sacrifice of throwing a virgin into a volcano would not appease the rain gods. If it saved just one crop....