nodoginnafight
No Party Affiliation
- Thread starter
- #41
No - based on Franken's amendmend companies that restrict access to the courts for charges of rape, assualt, and very specific acts cannot receive government contracts. Period.Based on Franken's argument the government could intrude into anycorporate governance issue.
AgreedI'd rather have a comedian who can make arguments of this nature, than a Michelle Bachman whose arguments are a joke.
Please read what I wrote rather than what you wish I wrote.
Franken's argument could be extended indefinitely into every area of corporate governance. So the gov't could decide that companies that give their execs use of a personal jet can't get contracts. Or companies that don't operate a closed shop. Or any other thing they want. It is a huge intrustion into private enterprise. And the worst part is it gives the gov't fewer providers to choose from, increasing cost and decreasing quality.
I not only read what you wrote - I copied and pasted it - no chance for confusion there. If you want to re-write what you previously wrote, please do. I'm glad that you could see the errors I pointed out. But don't be so insecure as to try to mask YOUR error as MINE.
I copied and pasted VERBATIM!
But In your amended complaint you are again in error. Franken's amendment is limited in scope as are the previous provisions that require certain types of insurance, bonuses and many of these things that you attribute to "franken's argument" are already in place and were in place while Franken was still on SNL.