Except that the laws of nature were in place before space and time. Which means that the potential for all of those non-material things you believe in existed before space and time began. Which means that non-material things existed before space and time.
Why are you back tracking now though? You argued that my belief was based upon an assumption of a beginning, right?
Are you arguing that the universe is infinite acting? That it always existed as in forever? The second law of thermodynamics precludes that. The idea of a cyclical universe is dead for precisely that reason. As time approaches infinity, the universe approaches thermal equilibrium. This we do not see.
"Except that the laws of nature were in place before space and time. Which means that the potential for all of those non-material things you believe in existed before space and time began. Which means that non-material things existed before space and time."
And you know this how?
It is an unbelievably stupid assertion that the laws of nature existed before anything existed..
Is that because you believe God didn't exist before space and time? You did say you believed in God, right?
By definition any living being that would qualify as what people define as God would be exist independent of space and time, in a completely different realm of conscious existence that is not based on anything material.
Your confusion stems from your misunderstanding the story of the creation in genesis which is about events that happened on earth no more than 6-10,000 years ago, not 14 billion years ago.
News flash. Everything in the universe is material, right? So everything in the universe that is not material (i.e. love, thought, music, etc) proceeds from the material.
Unless of course if you believe as I do that everything that is material proceeded from something that wasn't material.
Everything you mentioned is a product of the human mind, the only thing incorporeal about human beings that has no material existence.