Zone1 Is is a violation of U.S. law for a govt official to help law-breakers evade capture?

[Lisa558]

I'm guessing she is a Zionist...

And this one ^^^ is another nasty leftist who defends illegal aliens while insulting Jews (using the code word Zionist.)

 

[PeterPilot]

If they came here falsely claiming asylum, they have already violated our laws - and that’s about 80% of them.

HTF do you know their intentions and motivations? You do not, and neither do I. You're a dishonest Zionist poster and I've known that for a long time.

 

[Lisa558]

HTF do you know their intentions and motivations? You do not, and neither do I. You're a dishonest Zionist poster and I've known that for a long time.

Antisemite says what?

 

[Zincwarrior]

So, the question for debate is: it is lillegal for an elected government official to make it difficult for government law enforcement to capture foreigners here in violation of our laws and/or have committed criminal actions?

It is not illegal to restate the law. If it were police, every lawyer, judge, and all the posters on this board would be going to jail.

 

[Zincwarrior]

He has broken no laws that I can see.

Watched the video. Its a great summary of your legal rights. Nice!

Here is another one:

 

[Zincwarrior]

I guess you've never heard of Thomas Beckett ...

The laws have all been struck down by SCOTUS ... the standard for Free Speech is "imminent lawless actions" ... you see in the OP, all the judges are against the United States and freedom ...

woop you just talked legal stuff, please turn yourself in at the nearest jail.

 

[Lisa558]

It is not illegal to restate the law. If it were police, every lawyer, judge, and all the posters on this board would be going to jail.

The question wasn’t whether RESTATING the law is illegal. The question is “is it illegal for an elected position to actively help criminals evade the law”?

 

[Lisa558]

For example, would it be illegal for a judge, knowing the police are about to arrive in court to capture an illegal alien, to tell the criminal to hide in the janitor’s closet?

 

[Zincwarrior]

The question wasn’t whether RESTATING the law is illegal. The question is “is it illegal for an elected position to actively help criminals evade the law”?

Which was not the article you cited that he did. Explaining the law is not that.

 

[Zincwarrior]

For example, would it be illegal for a judge, knowing the police are about to arrive in court to capture an illegal alien, to tell the criminal to hide in the janitor’s closet?

Yes that would likely be obstruction.

 

[Lisa558]

I'm guessing she is a Zionist...

You mean….a Jew girl. Just say it without all these silly code words.

 

[Lisa558]

Which was not the article you cited that he did. Explaining the law is not that.

He was giving tips as to how illegals can evade capture. How is that different from the judge telling the illegal to hide in the closet?

 

[Zincwarrior]

He was giving tips as to how illegals can evade capture.

Yes, by detailing their legal rights. Every time an officer reads Miranda to a suspect they are doing the same.

How is that different from the judge telling the illegal to hide in the closet?

Because that is a logical fallacy. Further, do you want to live in a Republic where someone cannot tell you what your Constitutional rights are? Is that how it is in your home country?

 

[Lisa558]

Yes, by detailing their legal rights. Every time an officer reads Miranda to a suspect they are doing the same.

So he is trying his best to help illegals evade capture and remain in this country, even though they cause harm to Americans. So the answer is: maybe not illegal, but siding with the illegals from foreign countries over American law enforcement trying to keep this country great (or get back to it). Got it.

Because that is a logical fallacy. Further, do you want to live in a Republic where someone cannot tell you what your Constitutional rights are? Is that how it is in your home country?

I don’t want to live in a country where elected politicans care more about foreigners here illegally than the Americans whom their presence harms.

 

[Zincwarrior]

So he is trying his best to help illegals evade capture and remain in this country, even though they cause harm to Americans.

He can legally explain the Constitutional rights of anyone. INtent is irrelevant.

So the answer is: maybe not illegal,

Definitely not illegal. Not possible to be illegal.

but siding with the illegals from foreign countries over American law enforcement trying to keep this country great (or get back to it). Got it.

Be sure not to vote for him.

I don’t want to live in a country where elected politicans care more about foreigners here illegally than the Americans whom their presence harms.

What country do you live in?

 

[Hafar1014]

Hilarious

What exactly did Mamdani do that is illegal?

If an illegal was motivated by his video its obstruction

 

[Zincwarrior]

If an illegal was motivated by his video its obstruction

No. Its freedom of speech.

What is Federal Obstruction of Justice? | Criminal Defense

There are 21 ways federal obstruction of justice charges can be filed. Call 817-203-2220 today for a free consultation with our federal defense attorney.

versustexas.com

What constitutes federal obstruction of justice?​

There are 21 specific types of obstruction of justice listed in Title 18, Chapter 73 of the U.S. Code, including:

• Assault on a process server (1501)
• Resistance to an extradition agent (1502)
• Influencing or injuring an officer or juror (1503)
• Influencing a juror by writing (1504)
• Obstruction of proceedings before department, agencies and committees (1505)
• Theft or alteration of record or process (1506)
• Picketing or parading (1507)
• Recording, listening to or observing proceeding or grand juries while deliberating or voting (1508)
• Obstruction of court orders (1509)
• Obstruction of criminal investigations (1510)
• Obstruction of state or local law enforcement (1511)
• Tampering with a witness, victim, or informant (1512)
• Retaliating against a witness, victim or informant (1513)
• Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness (1514)
• Civil action to protect against retaliation in fraud cases (1514A)
• Definitions for certain provisions (1515)
• Obstruction of a federal audit (1516)
• Obstructing examination of a financial institution (1517)
• Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care crimes (1518)
• Destruction, alteration or falsification of records in federal investigations and bankruptcy (1519)
• Destruction of corporate audit records (1520)
• Retaliating against a federal judge or law enforcement by false claim or slander (1521)

 

[PeterPilot]

You mean….a Jew girl. Just say it without all these silly code words.

For your information Lisa, it is my position that the Christian Zionists are far more noxious than the Jewish version, but it is close.

 

[PeterPilot]

Antisemite says what?

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

 

[Stryder50]

What about the ones who want to be here and want to obey the relevant laws to do so?

They prove such by starting out to be here legally.

If they have entered illegally they have already broken at least one law and therefore are criminal the moment they crossed our borders without LEGAL permission.

QED