Is Hunter Biden the new Picasso or Dali?

[Polishprince]

Doesn't look like it .


In spite of a promising start to his career as an artisan of masterpieces, the market seems to have fallen off the cliff for the works of Hunter Biden.

The fact this has happened just as his father has left office, lends some traction to the theorem that is was never about the art, but instead Hunter was just peddling influence.

What do art lovers think? Is this latest decline in interest in Hunter Biden just a blip in the market and Hunter's works will be along side those of Van Gogh and Titian in future years in great museums?

Or should an investigation be launched and those who bought Biden's masterpieces be investigated for buying influence? (Hunter has a pardon- so he could be called as a witness and wouldn't have a 5th amendment out.

His Father Is Leaving Office. Is Hunter Biden’s Art Market Also Over?

Some see hope and skill reflected in the Biden paintings. Critics say their success, and significant prices, were boosted by Joe Biden’s celebrity and stature.

www.nytimes.com

 

[1srelluc]

I thought they all burned up.

 

[rightwinger]

Hunter is a better artist than Picasso

 

[Polishprince]

Hunter is a better artist than Picasso

Hunter's dad is tight with Pope Francis. Maybe considering this fact you brought up and Sleepy Joe's connections, Hunter can get the contract to repaint the Sistine Chapel?

The current paint job is over 500 years, maybe Hunter can put Dogs playing poker on the ceiling?

 

[Delldude]

The fact this has happened just as his father has left office, lends some traction to the theorem that is was never about the art, but instead Hunter was just peddling influence.

Same thing mysteriously happened to the Clinton Foundation.