Is God A Neuron - Someone Gave Us All A Unique Massive CNV

[NumburrOne]

Ive seen many times Discussed, Is god A Neuron...
This sheds some light on that theory I believe...



"Contrary to what we once thought, the genetic makeup of neurons in the brain aren't identical, but are made up of a patchwork of DNA," says corresponding author Fred Gage, Salk's Vi and John Adler Chair for Research on Age-Related Neurodegenerative Disease.

In the study, led by Mike McConnell, a former junior fellow in the Crick-Jacobs Center for Theoretical and Computational Biology at the Salk, researchers isolated about 100 neurons from three people posthumously. The scientists took a high-level view of the entire genome -- -- looking for large deletions and duplications of DNA called copy number variations or CNVs -- -- and found that as many as 41 percent of neurons had at least one unique, massive CNV that arose spontaneously, meaning it wasn't passed down from a parent. The CNVs are spread throughout the genome, the team found.

Surprising variation among genomes of individual neurons from same brain

 

[Politico]

I don't care what he is. If believing in God keeps the sheeple from going psycho I am all for it.

 

[NumburrOne]

I don't care what he is. If believing in God keeps the sheelple from going psycho I am all for it,

so true...
if it be gumby..
so it be...
we shall all go to gumby heaven...
That's where Michael Jackson is too...

 

[Delta4Embassy]

"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet. Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich." Napoleon Bonaparte

"The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat." Confucious

"A preoccupation with the next world clearly shows an inability to cope credibly with this one." Richard K. Morgan (Broken Angels)

 

[Sunni Man]

Human's are hard wired to believe in a higher power.

The creator of the universe did that on purpose. ....

 

[NumburrOne]

SOMATIC NERVOUS SYSTEM

The somatic nervous system innervates skeletal muscles and regulates activities that are under conscious control. Movements such as lifting the arms, bending the fingers, or even chewing food are included in this system. In the 2004 annual “Somatics” issue of AHP [Association for Humanistic Psychology] Perspective, Charles Badenhop suggested that humans are the proud owners of four brains—each brain evolving and functioning differently from the previous one. He deemed the first brain to be the somatic/enteric nervous system brain. He noted: “This brain came first in evolution and existed in very early organisms hundreds of millions of years ago” (2004, p. 13). Does Badenhop give any explanation of how or why the somatic nervous system evolved? No! He just “matter-of-factly” declares it to be true, and proceeds with his four-brain theory. But Badenhop is not alone in his lack of details regarding the evolution of the somatic nervous system.

A quick search of the National Library of Medicine reveals a deafening silence with respect to the mechanics of the somatic nervous system. Medem, one of the premier online physician/patient communication networks, suggested:


The human nervous system has evolved into an extremely complex network of specialized fibers, capable of a broad range of function.... During its evolution, the nervous system developed three main structural levels, each capable of performing different functions.... The two major divisions of the efferent nervous system are the somatic nervous system and the autonomic nervous system which controls the activities of the myocardium and the vascular smooth muscles (see “Overview of...,” n.d.).

Again, scientists recognize the existence and complexity of the somatic nervous system, but they offer no indication as to where it actually came from. Even Richard Dawkins, the famous atheist currently leading the charge for evolution theory, remains eerily quiet as to the origin and alleged evolutionary steps which led to the somatic nervous system. Evolutionists need to be reminded that anatomical descriptions and physiological information are not the equivalent of evolutionary origins. It is one thing to acknowledge and describe a particular system. It is something entirely different to demonstrate how that system came into existence from non-living material.

doomed

http://www.apologeticspress.org/apconten...ticle=1697

Our Fallen Genomes

 

[Sunni Man]

When addressing the issue of how life began.

The top scientists in the world use the word "Singularity" to describe the seminal event.

Saying that the transition from inorganic material to living organism was a 'singularity'.

Translation: Science doesn't have a clue. ....

 

[Vox]

why to you single neurons? It is common to any cell in the body.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

"God" is no better than "singularity." Neither side can explain how the universe began. But that's ok. As expressed in "The West Wing"

"...in the middle of all that begetting, something begun."

We exist now. Worrying too much about how we came to exist is kinda silly when more looming questions like "How long will we exist?" are much more pressing.

 

[NumburrOne]

why to you single neurons? It is common to any cell in the body.

neuron neurons...
if you read more about CNV's it will make sense...

looking for large deletions and duplications of DNA called copy number variations or CNVs -- -- and found that as many as 41 percent of neurons had at least one unique, massive CNV that arose spontaneously, meaning it wasn't passed down from a parent. The CNVs are spread throughout the genome, the team found.

 

[Vox]

why to you single neurons? It is common to any cell in the body.

neuron neurons...
if you read more about CNV's it will make sense...

looking for large deletions and duplications of DNA called copy number variations or CNVs -- -- and found that as many as 41 percent of neurons had at least one unique, massive CNV that arose spontaneously, meaning it wasn't passed down from a parent. The CNVs are spread throughout the genome, the team found.

I know more about neurons, DNA, genome and silent genes that you can imagine.

It is the same for ANY cell of the body.

 

[NumburrOne]

why to you single neurons? It is common to any cell in the body.

neuron neurons...
if you read more about CNV's it will make sense...

looking for large deletions and duplications of DNA called copy number variations or CNVs -- -- and found that as many as 41 percent of neurons had at least one unique, massive CNV that arose spontaneously, meaning it wasn't passed down from a parent. The CNVs are spread throughout the genome, the team found.

I know more about neurons, DNA, genome and silent genes that you can imagine.

It is the same for ANY cell of the body.

my apologies...

 

[Vox]

neuron neurons...
if you read more about CNV's it will make sense...

looking for large deletions and duplications of DNA called copy number variations or CNVs -- -- and found that as many as 41 percent of neurons had at least one unique, massive CNV that arose spontaneously, meaning it wasn't passed down from a parent. The CNVs are spread throughout the genome, the team found.

I know more about neurons, DNA, genome and silent genes that you can imagine.

It is the same for ANY cell of the body.

my apologies...

no need for them. It is just strange neurons were singled out.

 

[NumburrOne]

I know more about neurons, DNA, genome and silent genes that you can imagine.

It is the same for ANY cell of the body.

my apologies...

no need for them. It is just strange neurons were singled out.

so how do you explain the spontaneous part, and not from either parent ...

 

[Vox]

my apologies...

no need for them. It is just strange neurons were singled out.

so how do you explain the spontaneous part, and not from either parent ...

what do you mean? do you think that all the cells of our bodies retain the same genetic structure as it was determined right after conception?
then you are mistaken.

cells change all the time.

it happens to any cell.

they singled out neurons but never studied hepatocytes.

or the various cells of bronchial lining.

cells mutate ALL THE TIME.

actually billion times a day.
Because they reproduce all the time. That is normal. and all those abnormal deletions, additions or trans-locations etc are happening to ANY cell.
actually that is the basis of cancer development - the abnormal reproduction of the group of mutating cells. or developing of the other anomaly.
We have those abnormalities happening every second - and we have safeguards which destroy the abnormal cells if the happen to be in a larger than expected amount. If those safeguards break - cancer or other malignancy ensues( because cancer is a malignant overproduction of epithelial cells only)

 

[NumburrOne]

no need for them. It is just strange neurons were singled out.

so how do you explain the spontaneous part, and not from either parent ...

what do you mean? do you think that all the cells of our bodies retain the same genetic structure as it was determined right after conception?
then you are mistaken.

cells change all the time.

it happens to any cell.

they singled out neurons but never studied hepatocytes.

or the various cells of bronchial lining.

cells mutate ALL THE TIME.

actually billion times a day.
Because they reproduce all the time. That is normal. and all those abnormal deletions, additions or trans-locations etc are happening to ANY cell.
actually that is the basis of cancer development - the abnormal reproduction of the group of mutating cells. or developing of the other anomaly.
We have those abnormalities happening every second - and we have safeguards which destroy the abnormal cells if the happen to be in a larger than expected amount. If those safeguards break - cancer or other malignancy ensues( because cancer is a malignant overproduction of epithelial cells only)

you may be playing me here...
lets be open..
I published for everyone to see this info, I understand the irregularity patterns, I actually saw a device yesterday , looks like a radar gun, hold it over possible melanoma cell and it takes a pic,, multi level and they look for what you are talking about... off point though...

Contrary to what we once thought, the genetic makeup of neurons in the brain aren't identical, but are made up of a patchwork of DNA," says corresponding author Fred Gage, Salk's Vi and John Adler Chair for Research on Age-Related Neurodegenerative Disease.

In the study, led by Mike McConnell, a former junior fellow in the Crick-Jacobs Center for Theoretical and Computational Biology at the Salk, researchers isolated about 100 neurons from three people posthumously. The scientists took a high-level view of the entire genome -- -- looking for large deletions and duplications of DNA called copy number variations or CNVs -- -- and found that as many as 41 percent of neurons had at least one unique, massive CNV that arose spontaneously, meaning it wasn't passed down from a parent. The CNVs are spread throughout the genome, the team found.

Surprising variation among genomes of individual neurons from same brain

explain the bold ....
thanks...

 

[Vox]

The problem is, you fail to understand that the described ability of a change is not confined to neurons ONLY. The research was focused on the neurons and compared them to skin epitelial cells and the RATE of mutations is higher in neural cells than in the skin - which does not make neurons god, as you imply, but simply state the difference between skin epitelial ones and neirons.

Still, the study did not compare neurons with hepatocytes, for example, or myocardial ones - the highly organized cells of the body, so your conclusion that neuron is "the god" is baseless, since you don't know - maybe hepatocyte is

 

[NumburrOne]

no need for them. It is just strange neurons were singled out.

so how do you explain the spontaneous part, and not from either parent ...

what do you mean? do you think that all the cells of our bodies retain the same genetic structure as it was determined right after conception?
then you are mistaken.

cells change all the time.

it happens to any cell.

they singled out neurons but never studied hepatocytes.

or the various cells of bronchial lining.

cells mutate ALL THE TIME.

actually billion times a day.
Because they reproduce all the time. That is normal. and all those abnormal deletions, additions or trans-locations etc are happening to ANY cell.
actually that is the basis of cancer development - the abnormal reproduction of the group of mutating cells. or developing of the other anomaly.
We have those abnormalities happening every second - and we have safeguards which destroy the abnormal cells if the happen to be in a larger than expected amount. If those safeguards break - cancer or other malignancy ensues( because cancer is a malignant overproduction of epithelial cells only)

billion times aday...
no wonder im so damn tired...



so smarty pants, go explain in my genome doubling event thread how that relates to this or if it does...
flowering plants were created 200 million years ago as an effect from an unexplained genome doubling of all species, or something like that...
quoted from science news daily..

 

[Vox]

so how do you explain the spontaneous part, and not from either parent ...

what do you mean? do you think that all the cells of our bodies retain the same genetic structure as it was determined right after conception?
then you are mistaken.

cells change all the time.

it happens to any cell.

they singled out neurons but never studied hepatocytes.

or the various cells of bronchial lining.

cells mutate ALL THE TIME.

actually billion times a day.
Because they reproduce all the time. That is normal. and all those abnormal deletions, additions or trans-locations etc are happening to ANY cell.
actually that is the basis of cancer development - the abnormal reproduction of the group of mutating cells. or developing of the other anomaly.
We have those abnormalities happening every second - and we have safeguards which destroy the abnormal cells if the happen to be in a larger than expected amount. If those safeguards break - cancer or other malignancy ensues( because cancer is a malignant overproduction of epithelial cells only)

billion times aday...
no wonder im so damn tired...



so smarty pants, go explain in my genome doubling event thread how that relates to this or if it does...
flowering plants were created 200 million years ago as an effect from an unexplained genome doubling of all species, or something like that...
quoted from science news daily..

what the heck are you blabbering about?

 

[NumburrOne]

no need for them. It is just strange neurons were singled out.

so how do you explain the spontaneous part, and not from either parent ...

what do you mean? do you think that all the cells of our bodies retain the same genetic structure as it was determined right after conception?
then you are mistaken.

cells change all the time.

it happens to any cell.

they singled out neurons but never studied hepatocytes.

or the various cells of bronchial lining.

cells mutate ALL THE TIME.

actually billion times a day.
Because they reproduce all the time. That is normal. and all those abnormal deletions, additions or trans-locations etc are happening to ANY cell.
actually that is the basis of cancer development - the abnormal reproduction of the group of mutating cells. or developing of the other anomaly.
We have those abnormalities happening every second - and we have safeguards which destroy the abnormal cells if the happen to be in a larger than expected amount. If those safeguards break - cancer or other malignancy ensues( because cancer is a malignant overproduction of epithelial cells only)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/gener...ubling-event-occured-and-created-flowers.html

splain ricki...