Clearly they do have that authority- since Virginia bowed to that authority and reversed the conviction of Mildred and Richard Loving- and every state in the United States from that point on allowed mixed race marriages.
So clearly Ted Bundy had the right to rape and murder women since he did, uh? And Omar Mateen had the right to shoot and kill 49 people and shoot and injury 53 other, since he did. What kind of super ignorant tool are you to believe that just because something happens, it must be ok or legal? The federal government breaks the law every single day in this country. Do you know how many times Barry Sorento has violated the U.S. Constitution during his reign of terror? Oh wait, that's right, you wouldn't know since you're too damn lazy to actually read the short little document (and clearly too stupid to understand it anyway).
Remember- the only one saying that the Supreme Court doesn't have that authority is you. Citing you.
Remember - the
only one making up that nonsense is you.
Just you. Which is why everyone is laughing at your right now. Which they do every day since you have astoundingly ignorant posts. Literally every person in the United States who has read the U.S. Constitution has said the exact same thing. Hell, stupid, even Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. I mean, seriously, do you have any idea how astoundingly stupid you sound when you claim I am the "only" one stating this is unconstitutional when several Supreme Court Justices said the exact same thing. But of course, you didn't read their dissent on the case either because you're a blind, ignorant, partisan hack minion who swallows whatever load your libtard minions will shove down your throat. You're a joke. You're humiliating yourself on this site by illustrating how stupid you are too the world. That you're too lazy to do some basic homework and know what you're talking about before commenting is why you have zero credibility and why people consider you an asshole. Here is one of the finest Supreme Court Justices in U.S. history clearly citing the unconstitutionality of the ruling:
I join THE CHIEF JUSTICE’s opinion in full.
I write separately to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy. . . .
Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact— and the furthest extension one can even imagine—of
the Court’s claimed power to create “liberties” that the Constitution and its Amendments neglect to mention.
This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves.
Until the courts put a stop to it, public debate over same-sex marriage displayed American democracy at its best. . . . The electorates of 11 States, either directly or through their representatives, chose to expand the traditional definition of marriage. Many more decided not to. . . .
The Constitution places some constraints on self-rule—constraints adopted by the People themselves when they ratified the Constitution and its Amendments. Forbidden are laws “impairing the Obligation of Contracts,” denying “Full Faith and Credit” to the “public Acts” of other States, prohibiting the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing the right to keep and bear arms, authorizing unreasonable searches and seizures, and so forth. Aside from these limitations, those powers “reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” can be exercised as the States or the People desire. . . .
Wow! That is Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia bending you over and showing the world what a tool you are. It clearly cites over and over how unconstitutional that ruling was. "Constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine". If it were Constitutional junior, it would be a "revision". Damn are you
dumb.
Meanwhile the courts, the legislature and the Executive branch all recognize that authority.
Well, I just proved that myth with cited facts above. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito all stated that the Supreme Court had no such authority. Forget about each thread. And forget about each post for that matter. Literally, with each sentence you illustrate more deeply your profound
ignorance. You don't have the slightest clue what you are talking about - but it doesn't stop you from opening your mouth anyway.
You are the lone contrarian.
Well, that's already been disproven. Tell me something junior, how does it feel to be my personal ***** on USMB? I'm literally humiliated for you. I've never seen anyone post something so ignorant and so easily provable. If you had an ounce of common sense, you'd refrain from responding. Of course, it appears you don't mind exposing your ignorance so....
