Alright, the Iraqis told us to leave.
So why is Obama authorizing air strikes in Iraq?
That is quite simple to answer;
Actually democratic rule told us combat/armed US troops could not stay beyond January 1 2012 with the same legal protections they had per the 2008 agreement signed by Bush.
The Iraqi Government, the will of the majority (mostly Shiites) and the 2008 SOFA agreement set the date for when US troops must leave. Since the 2008 agreement hit its deadline for departure in 2012 once again the will of the majority and the Iraqi governmen that represents them decided not to extend the SOFA with the same legal protections.
Therefore we pulled out per their decision as a sovereign nation.
Uhderstanding that, the reason besides the obvious hitting a terrorist army with limited strikes, that US warplanes and Drones are bombing terrorist targets in Iraq right now is be it is the will of the majority if Iraqis that want the US to do it.
And there are no ground troops from the US to be engaged in the ground fighting that it will take to ultimately destroy the terrorists wherever the run.
That what the Iraqis oppose. Foreign ground troops working check points etc.
No ground troops is the will of the majority in the US and Iraq as it should be.
But limited airstrikes hitting the terrorists where needed and requested is the will of the majority in Iraq and should be ok with most sensible people in the US.
This just in:
Fifty-eight percent of Americans in the new poll supported Obama's authorization of air strikes against insurgents in Iraq, while 24 percent said they oppose the move. A similar percentage said they would approve of the use of drones. The air strikes brought a rare moment of bipartisan agreement, with 66 percent of Democrats and 65 percent of Republicans supporting the move. Independents expressed less positive opinions, with just half approving.
Americans Support Air Strikes In Iraq, But Strongly Oppose Sending In Troops
.