Iran Has Demolished U.S. Defence

Dickhead, you started this whole shit in the first place, remember? You blew the school, intentionally or not but you blew it and killed the girls. You stired up a hornet's nest 47 or whatever years ago
and now you've got the nerve to accuse them of answering in kind? Some twisted sence of justice you got, fu**ing piece of shit!
Now that made total sense.

Not at all.
 
Yes, the Hohols are a wretched lot. When there is nothing left of them I wonder who will be willing to dust them off? Probably their Russian cousins.
Yeah, Putin called them a brotherly lot as well. Fu*kem bastards in every unimaginably twisted way.)
 
who is "they"
Iranians.
It is clear (from the protests) that the Iranians are not happy with their leadership.
There were a lot of protests in America for different reasons, that clearly demonstrated that many Americans are not happy with their leadership, too, but it doesn't mean that even protesters do want to see America bombed and occupied.

The fact that they were then slaughtered shows they had reason to be.
The fact that those protest were supressed that quickly and easily, means that protesters are absolute minority. Looks like (at least for now) that absolute majority of Iranians are ready to fight for their freedom and independence.
 
Iranians.
They don't get a say in the matter.

If they "Say" anything, it tends to result in a firing squad or worse.

There were a lot of protests in America for different reasons, that clearly demonstrated that many Americans are not happy with their leadership, too, but it doesn't mean that even protesters do want to see America bombed and occupied.
Thank you for pointing that out. As you can see from this board, there are a great many who don't like America and really do wish something would happen to it. So, I think maybe pointing that out was a bit short-sighted on your part.

And nobody is occupying Iran except Iranians.

The fact that those protest were supressed that quickly and easily
Yes, shooting the protestors tends to end the protests.

means that protesters are absolute minority
No, it means that the rest would prefer not to follow their friends to the wall.

Looks like (at least for now) that absolute majority of Iranians are ready to fight for their freedom and independence.
Based on what, might I ask?

The desire to not get shot?

Sorry....doesn't wash.
 
The paid Russian posters are still working on their English.
It's not the English, it's the logic and method of response.

The US bombed a girls school so we can shoot missels at hotels. :funnyface::funnyface::funnyface:

It seems they were not happy with the girls school getting obliterated......

But how dare anyone be outraged at their response.

Makes perfectly stupid nonsense.
 
The fact that those protest were supressed that quickly and easily, means that protesters are absolute minority. Looks like (at least for now) that absolute majority of Iranians are ready to fight for their freedom and independence.
I can't let the stupiidity of this statement pass altogether......

It's well known that the demonstations that took place were huge. So, not absolute minority. Absent a poll, we'll never know what it is. But it isn't a fringe.

It is also well known that Iran has a history of violent responses to protests. So for those people to head into the streets means they were VERY UNHAPPY.

And, of course, the vaunted regime slaughtered them in response. How you can even hope to call the useful is beyond me. It's barbaric. But I, for one, don't care about regime change. Except in the sense that I totally support shoving a JDAM up the ass of any Iranian official who shows his face in public for the next 20 years. We'll just keep changing them ourselves.
 
They don't get a say in the matter.

If they "Say" anything, it tends to result in a firing squad or worse.
C'mon. And who are suppose to be in those firing squads? Chinamen or, may be, Martians? Those are Iranians, too. Any man has as much power over another man as he allows it.

Thank you for pointing that out. As you can see from this board, there are a great many who don't like America and really do wish something would happen to it. So, I think maybe pointing that out was a bit short-sighted on your part.
As far as I can see, they also want good for America. They usually just have different understanding of what is better for the USA.
Ideas of allowing Russia nuke America for taking power by certain groups are mostly jokes (like in music video "Friendtopia" from The Crazy Ex-Girlfriend).

And nobody is occupying Iran except Iranians.
Exactly. And they want to keep it this way. And to keep it this way they need to kill bad guys who bomb them and try to interfere with their inner politics.

Yes, shooting the protestors tends to end the protests.
Only if protesters are in absolute minority. Otherwise protesters take weapons in their hands and shoot back.

No, it means that the rest would prefer not to follow their friends to the wall.
Or prefer not to fight for some BS.

Based on what, might I ask?

The desire to not get shot?

Sorry....doesn't wash.
They don't want to be shot and they don't want to be bombed. And that's why they do fight back Americans and don't fight back regime (which is totally supported by majority of Iranian people). They think that fighting against the USA is better and safer than fighting against their own people.
 
C'mon. And who are suppose to be in those firing squads? Chinamen or, may be, Martians? Those are Iranians, too. Any man has as much power over another man as he allows it.
Who is in those firing squads? I don't know. And I have no idea why it matters.

They have the guns. That is the power and they used it.

Your POV is what....that they Irananians are OK with having brother and sister shot?
As far as I can see, they also want good for America.
Then you can't see very far.
They usually just have different understanding of what is better for the USA.
No. They want their way or they say they will leave (and turn out to be liars in that regard). They think their way is the only way and they trample our basic principles every chance they get. Then they get pissed when we fight back (how do you think Trump came about?).

Ideas of allowing Russia nuke America for taking power by certain groups are mostly jokes (like in music video "Friendtopia" from The Crazy Ex-Girlfriend).
Say what ?

Exactly. And they want to keep it this way. And to keep it this way they need to kill bad guys who bomb them and try to interfere with their inner politics.
More black and white statements that might make sense in a text book. Thanks for oversimplifying to the point of uselessness. You talked about occupiers. I said there were none. You agreed. End of that point. The rest of your rant is meaningless.

Only if protesters are in absolute minority. Otherwise protesters take weapons in their hands and shoot back.
A claim that is meaningless. That is why we have the 2nd amendment. Because a minority government can keep the population in check if they population has no guns.

They don't want to be shot
That's the point. The rest of your sermon can go to someone who thinks you know what you are talking about.
 
They don't get a say in the matter.

If they "Say" anything, it tends to result in a firing squad or worse.


Thank you for pointing that out. As you can see from this board, there are a great many who don't like America and really do wish something would happen to it. So, I think maybe pointing that out was a bit short-sighted on your part.

And nobody is occupying Iran except Iranians.


Yes, shooting the protestors tends to end the protests.


No, it means that the rest would prefer not to follow their friends to the wall.


Based on what, might I ask?

The desire to not get shot?

Sorry....doesn't wash.
When does a protest become a riot and foreign instigated uprising? when it's in Iran, Ukraine Maidan.
 
I can't let the stupiidity of this statement pass altogether......

It's well known that the demonstations that took place were huge. So, not absolute minority. Absent a poll, we'll never know what it is. But it isn't a fringe.
There were huge demonstrations against systemic racism in the USA. But how many BLM guys do actually want to see America bombed and occupied?

It is also well known that Iran has a history of violent responses to protests. So for those people to head into the streets means they were VERY UNHAPPY.
Not that much.

And, of course, the vaunted regime slaughtered them in response.
Who is "regime"? The regime are just another Iranians. Soldiers, sergeants, colonels, generals, priests, industrial workers, farmers taxi drivers et cetera... And they decided that fighting America is better idea than fighting Supreme Leader and government.

How you can even hope to call the useful is beyond me. It's barbaric. But I, for one, don't care about regime change. Except in the sense that I totally support shoving a JDAM up the ass of any Iranian official who shows his face in public for the next 20 years. We'll just keep changing them ourselves.
The problem is, that you can't change human nature by few bombs. You bomb them and they will find the opportunity to bomb you.
 
When does a protest become a riot and foreign instigated uprising? when it's in Iran, Ukraine Maidan.
Colour revolutions, they call them for some reason. The word itself makes the paid provocateurs look like the proud freedom and that other bull, what's its name, democracy seekers. I wondered what took the authorities so long to disperse those crowds by beating the shit out of them. Felt good when they finally did. A little too many of them, revolutions, per a planet.
 
Colour revolutions, they call them for some reason. The word itself makes the paid provocateurs look like the proud freedom and that other bull, what's its name, democracy seekers. I wondered what took the authorities so long to disperse those crowds by beating the shit out of them. Felt good when they finally did. A little too many of them, revolutions, per a planet.
Indeed but i blame some of the targeted Countries for allowing NGOs to run riot, and that includes Yanukovych in Ukraine, remember when insane McCain and that ***** Newland were stirring up the mob in Kiev, they should have been stopped at the airport and put on the next flight back to the US, or better still arrested but he allowed to let things get out of hand and it almost cost him his life, same thing happened in Serbia that ended with local Serbian Quislings turning Milosovic over to Nato but it cost Zoran Djindijc his life when a Serbian patriot blew his head off.
 
15th post
Who is "regime"? The regime are just another Iranians. Soldiers, sergeants, colonels, generals, priests, industrial workers, farmers taxi drivers et cetera... And they decided that fighting America is better idea than fighting Supreme Leader and government.
So they shoot their own citizens in response.

Makes perfect sense
 
The problem is, that you can't change human nature by few bombs. You bomb them and they will find the opportunity to bomb you.
In this case, I'll take the trade-off.

BTW: Not trying to change nature. If the people of Iran are O.K. with the slaughter of essentially a small city in two or three days......that is their business. I'm fed up with IRAN in general and I have no problem goosing their leaders with rockeyes all day long.
 
Back
Top Bottom