Investigate the Moore/Trump Accusers

[protectionist]

Now that the Dec. 12 date is passed, and Doug Jones squeaked out a tie victory (less than 1%), thanks to a lot of very dumb Alabama voters, it's time to investigate the accusers who put Jones over the top. As many in the country see these women as probable paid hit women, it should be interesting to see if their financial conditions change over the next year (2018).

If these accusers did get paid for acting, they will be people who likely are hard pressed for money, and not likely to hold back on spending it. Should be interesting to see if they suddenly find themselves in a new house or car, wearing high-priced clothes and jewelry, buying boats, going on expensive vacations, quitting jobs, and investing significant sums of money.

Questions will be asked. If these woman become rolling in dough, the Moore campaign people as well as the US govt, should be asking them where they got all this money. Anyone could find ways to hide money, but spending it is another thing. Spending always has people on the seller side of the sale. Some of those sellers are bound to be Republicans, and knowledgable of who these women are.

They also would not be fond of the idea of losing a US Senate seat to a wacky headed Democrat, with hare-brained policies. If these accusers start spending big bucks, a thorough investigation must commence immediately. That goes for the ones who accused President Trump too. If/whenever bribery is discovered, the payers should be prosecuted along with the accusers. That could start with investigating California congresswomen Jackie Spier (D-CA), Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL), Sen. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), et al who, calling for an investigation of Trump, seem to have an inordinate interest in these accuser women.

Sickening to see Doug Jones talking about what his people "showed" the country. All they showed is that a high level govt job can be won by DECEITFUL CHEATING, and the govt must be tougher against the cheaters. Now that Democrats have found they can win just by throwing charges against their opponent (with zero proof), how many Republicans running for office will now be accused of every unprovable thing you can think of ? This is one of the worst things to happen to our democracy in its history.

 

[BULLDOG]

Absolutely right, and Roy Moore will begin that investigation as soon as he gets back from watching the junior high school cheer leading tryouts.

 

[Skylar]

Now that the Dec. 12 date is passed, and Doug Jones squeaked out a tie victory (less than 1%), thanks to a lot of very dumb Alabama voters, it's time to investigate the accusers who put Jones over the top. As many in the country see these women as probable paid hit women, it should be interesting to see if their financial conditions change over the next year (2018).

Do you have evidence to back up these accusations? Or are you demanding an investigation because you can't back up any of what you just said?

 

[Toro]

We should investigate all the politicians who said Obama was born in Kenya.

They are too stupid to hold office.

 

[Syriusly]

Now that the Dec. 12 date is passed, and Doug Jones squeaked out a tie victory (less than 1%),.

'a tie victory'? LOL

Alabama Votes | Alabama Secretary of State

Doug Jones (DEM)

49.92%
671,151
Roy S. Moore (REP)

48.38%
650,436
Write-In

1.69%
22,780

 

[Syriusly]

it's time to investigate the accusers who put Jones over the top. As many in the country see these women as probable paid hit women, it should be interesting to see if their financial conditions change over the next year (2018)..

Who is surprised that protectionist believes that it is more important to investigate the accusers than the accused?

 

[toobfreak]

Now that the Dec. 12 date is passed, and Doug Jones squeaked out a tie victory (less than 1%), thanks to a lot of very dumb Alabama voters, it's time to investigate the accusers who put Jones over the top. As many in the country see these women as probable paid hit women, it should be interesting to see if their financial conditions change over the next year (2018).

Was it that close? Wow. Proof once again that there is power in the Media and without it in their back pocket, the Left would be like an octopus out of water. Obviously , Jones election was a vote against what they saw as a very immoral man (still without any proof! And the guy has held on to the bitter end denouncing the claims). As to financial conditions, I'm sure you know Lisa Bloom waved as much as $750,000 at women to "spill the beans" about Trump in the final days of the election. One lady got her mortgage paid off, the other TURNED DOWN the 750K. Now Lisa is under investigation for election campaign finance law violations.

Sickening to see Doug Jones talking about what his people "showed" the country.

Don't worry, after as few years to see what they put in office, they will probably go running and screaming sorry they ever gave any contemporary Democrat a chance.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Now that the Dec. 12 date is passed, and Doug Jones squeaked out a tie victory (less than 1%),

The official "unoffical" margin at the Alabama Secretary of State site is 1.54% not less that 1%.

thanks to a lot of very dumb Alabama voters,

I know, if not for them the rejection of Moore would have resulted in a much larger percentage confirming rejection.


>>>>

 

[Toro]

Hilarious burltthurt thread.

 

[Silent Warrior]

It is hilarious. The same people that defended Bill Clinton, a proven sexual predator are now deriding someone whose accusers accusations have not been proven and many of whose have proven fabricated. You can't make this stuff up.

 

[ph3iron]

Now that the Dec. 12 date is passed, and Doug Jones squeaked out a tie victory (less than 1%), thanks to a lot of very dumb Alabama voters, it's time to investigate the accusers who put Jones over the top. As many in the country see these women as probable paid hit women, it should be interesting to see if their financial conditions change over the next year (2018).

If these accusers did get paid for acting, they will be people who likely are hard pressed for money, and not likely to hold back on spending it. Should be interesting to see if they suddenly find themselves in a new house or car, wearing high-priced clothes and jewelry, buying boats, going on expensive vacations, quitting jobs, and investing significant sums of money.

Questions will be asked. If these woman become rolling in dough, the Moore campaign people as well as the US govt, should be asking them where they got all this money. Anyone could find ways to hide money, but spending it is another thing. Spending always has people on the seller side of the sale. Some of those sellers are bound to be Republicans, and knowledgable of who these women are.

They also would not be fond of the idea of losing a US Senate seat to a wacky headed Democrat, with hare-brained policies. If these accusers start spending big bucks, a thorough investigation must commence immediately. That goes for the ones who accused President Trump too. If/whenever bribery is discovered, the payers should be prosecuted along with the accusers. That could start with investigating California congresswomen Jackie Spier (D-CA), Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL), Sen. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), et al who, calling for an investigation of Trump, seem to have an inordinate interest in these accuser women.

Sickening to see Doug Jones talking about what his people "showed" the country. All they showed is that a high level govt job can be won by DECEITFUL CHEATING, and the govt must be tougher against the cheaters. Now that Democrats have found they can win just by throwing charges against their opponent (with zero proof), how many Republicans running for office will now be accused of every unprovable thing you can think of ? This is one of the worst things to happen to our democracy in its history.

No actual facts as usual.
I guess you believe hill sold uranium to the Russians
"Throwing charges?" Hilarious. Read the C grabbers website devoted to his lies?

 

[WorldWatcher]

It is hilarious. The same people that defended Bill Clinton, a proven sexual predator are now deriding someone whose accusers accusations have not been proven and many of whose have proven fabricated. You can't make this stuff up.

As a Republican I supported the impeachment of Bill Clinton at the time.

As to the Moore accusers it has not be litigated in a court of law and probably never will. Moore doesn't want his accusors anywhere near swearing under oath and he doesn't want to be placed under oath either.

So what we have he said, she said,she said,she said,she said,she said,she said,she said,she said,she said situation with credibility on the side of the accusers due to contemporaneous statements made to relatives and friends 3-4 decades ago.


>>>>

 

[Toro]

It is hilarious. The same people that defended Bill Clinton, a proven sexual predator are now deriding someone whose accusers accusations have not been proven and many of whose have proven fabricated. You can't make this stuff up.

You still have President Pussy-Grabber. So there’s that.

 

[monkrules]

But...why is the "Family Values" party, the party of "christians" always attacking the victims?

What Would Jesus Do?

Hell, the evangelicals were supporting the pervert, Moore, so I guess the "christian" party shit is just that. Shit.

Bullshit, to be precise.

 

[protectionist]

As a Republican I supported the impeachment of Bill Clinton at the time.

As to the Moore accusers it has not be litigated in a court of law and probably never will. Moore doesn't want his accusors anywhere near swearing under oath and he doesn't want to be placed under oath either.

So what we have he said, she said,she said,she said,she said,she said,she said,she said,she said,she said situation with credibility on the side of the accusers due to contemporaneous statements made to relatives and friends 3-4 decades ago.

Incredible that you can (with a straight face) claim that >> "credibility on the side of the accusers", when the accusers have been silent for 39 years , and only pop up one one before a politically critical election, for a US Senate seat which is close to a tie (Republicans 51, Democrats 49)

Just goes to show. Liberals will say anything.

 

[protectionist]

No actual facts as usual.
I guess you believe hill sold uranium to the Russians
"Throwing charges?" Hilarious. Read the C grabbers website devoted to his lies?

The "no actual facts" is attributed to the 39 years ago, right before an election ACCUSERS. Not a single shred of evidence among them. Are they buying new cars right now ?

 

[protectionist]

You still have President Pussy-Grabber. So there’s that.

How many times have YOU uttered male chauvenist, sexually, abusive comments ? No need to reply. We won't believe you.

 

[protectionist]

But...why is the "Family Values" party, the party of "christians" always attacking the victims?

What Would Jesus Do?

Hell, the evangelicals were supporting the pervert, Moore, so I guess the "christian" party shit is just that. Shit.

Bullshit, to be precise.

"Victims" ? There ARE NO victims. The only time there is a "victim" is when proof is presented, and due process of law is accorded. The anti-American idiots accusing Roy Moore have provided none of this. They should be ashamed big-time, for trashing our precious American fundamental values.

 

[busybee01]

But...why is the "Family Values" party, the party of "christians" always attacking the victims?

What Would Jesus Do?

Hell, the evangelicals were supporting the pervert, Moore, so I guess the "christian" party shit is just that. Shit.

Bullshit, to be precise.

"Victims" ? There ARE NO victims. The only time there is a "victim" is when proof is presented, and due process of law is accorded. The anti-American idiots accusing Roy Moore have provided none of this. They should be ashamed big-time, for trashing our precious American fundamental values.

Shut up LOSER!! The fact is that some of his victims told other people 39 years ago. How would they know Moore would run for the Senate 39 years later? In addition to that, his views on the Constitution are nutty. He believes that Muslims should not be in Congress. He believes that we don't need any amendments afer the 10th. slavery would still be legal. Women would not have the right to vote. He was unfit to be a Senator.

 

[ph3iron]

No actual facts as usual.
I guess you believe hill sold uranium to the Russians
"Throwing charges?" Hilarious. Read the C grabbers website devoted to his lies?

The "no actual facts" is attributed to the 39 years ago, right before an election ACCUSERS. Not a single shred of evidence among them. Are they buying new cars right now ?

Dumb.
How do you have facts with 20 girls? All republicans
It was the Weinstein revelations that gave them strength
So you don't believe 20 women and a good old boy white boy who banned him from the Mall?
What do you want? Video evidence?