Introducing the Leo DiCaprio Act, the cost of being completely 180 degrees wrong, and cost America $$ in the process

[EMH]

It seems to me that when "activists" get paid, their integrity suffers. It is just too easy to be an "activist" and never be held accountable for being completely wrong. Theorizing, of course, is necessary and will produce "wrong theories." The "wrong theories" would get weeded out if the "system" was not corrupt. Unfortunately for America since November of 1963, it has proven itself to be completely corrupt. The "activists" are also corrupt, extremely corrupt, funded by other countries like China.

And in every "activist group" there are "leaders" and "followers."

The message is as follows...

IF you are an ACTIVIST for a cause for 5 or more years, you had better be certain that cause is 100% factually accurate, because if it isn't, if it gets outed as complete fraud....


"leaders" = death and total asset forfeiture

"followers" = prison, fine, and stripped for life of the right to vote


I'll call it the Leo DiCaprio Act

Any sponsors on the Hill???

 

[Crepitus]

You just condemned the entire upper echelon of the republican party to death along with the management of fox new, breitbart, newsmax and others.

 

[EMH]

You just condemned the entire upper echelon of the republican party to death along with the management of fox new, breitbart, newsmax and others.

BRING IT...


CO2 FRAUD nails your side.

911 nails that which is WRONG with the GOP since Newt...

 

[Hollie]

You just condemned the entire upper echelon of the republican party to death along with the management of fox new, breitbart, newsmax and others.

You just announced your idiocy on a public forum, little lady.

 

[Crepitus]

BRING IT...


CO2 FRAUD nails your side.

911 nails that which is WRONG with the GOP since Newt...

I'm not threatening them, I'm pointing out your error in judgement.

 

[EMH]

I'm not threatening them, I'm pointing out your error in judgement.

You are trying to equivocate.

It ain't working...

 

[citygator]

Isn there a subforum for random weekend thoughts pulled out of your ass without links or a foundation in reality?

 

[EMH]

Isn there a subforum for random weekend thoughts pulled out of your ass without links or a foundation in reality?

LOL!!!

Why are you opposed to holding "activists" accountable for spreading treasonous lies??

 

[citygator]

LOL!!!

Why are you opposed to holding "activists" accountable for spreading treasonous lies??

Treasonous lies? Leo is attempting to overthrow the government with lies? um.. okay. Can you support that claim?

 

[EMH]

Treasonous lies? Leo is attempting to overthrow the government with lies? um.. okay. Can you support that claim?

$20 trillion is treason. Waging war against America by bilking America of America's wealth.

Earth is not warming.

And yes, that claim is fully supported...

by ...


highly correlated satellite and balloon data
no breakout in cane activity
no ocean rise
no rise in Surface Air Pressure


CO2 is not the cause of Earth climate change. If you become an "activist" for a treasonous fraud on the American People, you should be held accountable...

 

[citygator]

$20 trillion is treason. Waging war against America by bilking America of America's wealth.

Earth is not warming.

And yes, that claim is fully supported...

by ...


highly correlated satellite and balloon data
no breakout in cane activity
no ocean rise
no rise in Surface Air Pressure


CO2 is not the cause of Earth climate change. If you become an "activist" for a treasonous fraud on the American People, you should be held accountable...

So dumping 2.3 trillion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and doubling its concentration is harmless? OK. Seems like less pollution would be better than more. Why are you so opposed to moderating pollution? Minimally it is killing marine life raising the acidity of the ocean. At the most it is causing global warming. So somewhere between killing marine life and killing all life is what is happening. What's the big deal supporting reduced emissions?

 

[EMH]

So dumping 2.3 trillion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and doubling its concentration is harmless?

didn't warm anything...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling."


Translation from NBC spin - for more than three decades of rising CO2, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere, before being FUDGED with laughable BS that would not stand up in court in 2005

Seems like less pollution would be better than more.

CO2 is not pollution. It is necessary for life.

At the most it is causing global warming.

YOU should be HELD ACCOUNTABLE for PUSHING THAT LIE

What's the big deal supporting reduced emissions?

Yeah, who cares if the Alliance for Treason Against America bilked us for $20 trillion over a lie??

 

[citygator]

didn't warm anything...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling."


Translation from NBC spin - for more than three decades of rising CO2, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere, before being FUDGED with laughable BS that would not stand up in court in 2005








CO2 is not pollution. It is necessary for life.







YOU should be HELD ACCOUNTABLE for PUSHING THAT LIE







Yeah, who cares if the Alliance for Treason Against America bilked us for $20 trillion over a lie??

Why dont you try emitting CO2 from your car into your garage for about an hour with the doors closed and tell us how necessary for life it is? Ok, dont do that cuz you'll die.

Why are you so opposed to finding ways to restrict emitting CO2? Cars arent natural parts of the world so finding ways to reduce their impact seems more natural, right? I mean you guys have turned emitting a lot of pollution into a goal instead of a negative side effect of mankind's progress. Progress would dictate reducing our unnatural impact on what is likely the most beautiful planet in the entire galaxy of planets.

 

[EMH]

Why dont you try emitting CO2 from your car into your garage for about an hour with the doors closed and tell us how necessary for life it is?

This left wing science invalid MORON doesn't understand the difference between CO and CO2...

DUH....

Why are you so opposed to finding ways to restrict emitting CO2?

There is precisely ZERO EVIDENCE to suggest doing that for any reason...

 

[citygator]

This left wing science invalid MORON doesn't understand the difference between CO and CO2...

DUH....


There is precisely ZERO EVIDENCE to suggest doing that for any reason...

Youre in the minority there but let’s use some super simple logic. IF you are wrong what is the worst case scenario for us? IF you are right and we spend money to cut back on emissions what is the worst case scenario?

 

[EMH]

Youre in the minority there

Left Wing Science invalids somehow "think" that science is an election poll.

It isn't.

Galileo didn't win the poll. But he was right, because he noticed THE ACTUAL DATA.

YOU have just been shown the ACTUAL satellite and balloon data showing NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite rising CO2.

SCIENCE SAYS THEORY REJECTED

"The science" says FUDGE THE DATA and continue BILKING THE TAXPAYER....

IF you are wrong

It isn't me, MORON, it is THE DATA....

 

[citygator]

Left Wing Science invalids somehow "think" that science is an election poll.

It isn't.

Galileo didn't win the poll. But he was right, because he noticed THE ACTUAL DATA.

YOU have just been shown the ACTUAL satellite and balloon data showing NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite rising CO2.

SCIENCE SAYS THEORY REJECTED

"The science" says FUDGE THE DATA and continue BILKING THE TAXPAYER....





It isn't me, MORON, it is THE DATA....

What are your credentials so that I can weigh your anonymous internet post with 90% of scientists? Just a couple of bullet points please to give me the gist.

 

[EMH]

What are your credentials so that I can weigh your anonymous internet post with 90% of scientists? Just a couple of bullet points please to give me the gist.

Again it is some sort of "poll" that matters, not THE DATA...

and the "climate scientists" are not SCIENTISTS since they do not practice actual science, they just fudge data and lie and bilk the taxpayer...


How about this. You claim oceans are rising. How about finding us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of "ocean rise..."

 

[citygator]

Again it is some sort of "poll" that matters, not THE DATA...

and the "climate scientists" are not SCIENTISTS since they do not practice actual science, they just fudge data and lie and bilk the taxpayer...


How about this. You claim oceans are rising. How about finding us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of "ocean rise..."

So you have no credentials and want to see still photo of slowly rising levels? Um. OK. Youre not a serious person you’re just trolling for attention. If you get brave enough to post your credentials so I can determine if your opinion is important or not tag me so I can come back to this thread and ask you expert questions if warranted.

 

[EMH]

So you have no credentials

Bullshit liar you are. The biggest credential is being the source/cause/author of what caused this...

Google Search

www.google.com

want to see still photo of slowly rising levels?

No, we want an old one showing lower water than today. You cannot show us one, because the oceans are NOT RISING, because there is NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT, because Planet Earth is NOT WARMING...

Let's see Lady Liberty. Is the ocean rising, Lady Liberty?

Answer NO

• 
  
•