International Law: Jerusalem Belongs To Israel

[Phoenall]

so the op is a lie.

Good.

it's called google, look it up, i just did. :d

you found the law?

What's it called?

the mandate of palestine

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

Has Palestine been recognised by the UN, have they been accepted as observers. Did they sign the UN charter before being allowed to be observers. They are signatories to the UN charter and the Geneva conventions, which means they are in breach of INTERNATIONAL LAW by refusing to talk about peace.

They blew it when they demanded recognition at the UN and signed to accept it, a bigger fail than any you have made child.

You are a lying sack of Nazionist shit. Palestine has never signed the Geneva Conventions.

And there is no international law giving Jerusalem to Israel.

Oh really?

Read and weep cherrieKKKins.

Howard Grief: Legal Rights and Title of Sovereignty of the Jewish People

 

[Victory67]

the mandate of palestine

which is no longer valid.

the mandate expired decades ago.

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

the mandate of palestine

which is no longer valid.

the mandate expired decades ago.

Oh really?

 

[Victory67]

the mandate of palestine

which is no longer valid.

the mandate expired decades ago.

Oh really?

Yes,

The Mandate expired just before Israel declared independence.

And there is no international law that makes Jerusalem part of Israel.

Don't they teach you ANYTHING in Nazionist school?

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

which is no longer valid.

the mandate expired decades ago.

Oh really?

Yes you dumb *****.

The Mandate expired just before Israel declared independence.

And there is no international law that makes Jerusalem part of Israel.

Don't they teach you ANYTHING in Nazionist school?

Enough of the personal insults. Just because you lose every issue you debate there is no need to lose your temper.

Nothing has negated the San Remo Mandate. You should know that as it has been explained to you often enough.

 

[MJB12741]

Let us be very careful not to upset Victory or we may lose him here for all the laughs he gives us while those he supports continue killing us infidels all over the world.

Oh really?

Yes you dumb *****.

The Mandate expired just before Israel declared independence.

And there is no international law that makes Jerusalem part of Israel.

Don't they teach you ANYTHING in Nazionist school?

Enough of the personal insults. Just because you lose every issue you debate there is no need to lose your temper.

Nothing has negated the San Remo Mandate. You should know that as it has been explained to you often enough.

 

[Victory67]

Enough of the personal insults. Just because you lose every issue you debate there is no need to lose your temper.

Nothing has negated the San Remo Mandate. You should know that as it has been explained to you often enough.

The San Remo Conference was 94 years ago.

Its no longer valid, you idiot.

There is no international law that gives Jerusalem to Israel.

 

[Kondor3]

...

Enough of the personal insults. Just because you lose every issue you debate there is no need to lose your temper.

Nothing has negated the San Remo Mandate. You should know that as it has been explained to you often enough.

The San Remo Conference was 94 years ago.

Its no longer valid, you idiot.

There is no international law that gives Jerusalem to Israel.

Yes.

Of course.

And we all know about your superior competency in matters of International Law.

Oh, by the way...

Speaking of International Law...

And your credibility on the subject...

You have some unfinished business from last night...

========================================

You have asserted that no international treaty is recognized unless registered at the UN.

Let me rephrase that.

Yes, I think you'd better.

We may now confidently disregard your assertion that no international treaty is valid until it is registered with the UN.

No international treaty signed before the ratification of the UN Charter, is valid until it is registered with the UN.

I repeat my earlier question.

What agency does one go to, to 'register' a treaty with the UN?

What process(es) does one undertake, to 'register' a treaty with the UN?

Can you serve-up an example of a treaty, ratified prior to the issuance of the UN Charter in July 1945, which was 'registered' with the UN?

Perhaps, in identifying such a treaty, you can answer the questions pertaining to (1) the agency within the UN and (2) the process(es), yes?

The floor is still yours.

Impress us.

========================================

This will help you to solidify your perception amongst your peers, as a credible discussion partner on the subject of International Law...

A consummation devoutly to be wished...

Your colleagues await your illuminating answers with the greatest anticipation...

 

[Victory67]

Still waiting for someone, anyone, to name the still in-effect international law that gives Jerusalem to Israel.

 

[Indeependent]

Still waiting for someone, anyone, to name the still in-effect international law that gives Jerusalem to Israel.

Recognition by the top 10 Super Powers not good enough for you?
Christians recognize one very important fact...A Jerusalem owned by JEWS will NEVER deny ANY religion access to it's Holy Sites.

 

[Victory67]

Recognition by the top 10 Super Powers not good enough for you?
Christians recognize one very important fact...A Jerusalem owned by JEWS will NEVER deny ANY religion access to it's Holy Sites.

Name one superpower that recognizes Israeli soveignty over Jerusalem, let alone East Jerusalem.

 

[Indeependent]

Recognition by the top 10 Super Powers not good enough for you?
Christians recognize one very important fact...A Jerusalem owned by JEWS will NEVER deny ANY religion access to it's Holy Sites.

Name one superpower that recognizes Israeli soveignty over Jerusalem, let alone East Jerusalem.

Name one Super Power that is ordering The JEWS to surrender Jerusalem to the Muslims.
You do realize that the next military conflict will result in a plethora of dead Muslims.
Israel has the technolgy, the expertise and the will to exercise their options and there's not currently even one First World nation that will do anything more than make a speech at the UN.
And after all is said, talk is cheap.

 

[Kondor3]

Still waiting for someone, anyone, to name the still in-effect international law that gives Jerusalem to Israel.

Perhaps you'll find someone willing to give you that answer...

Right after you complete your homework assignment from last night...

You know...

The assignment where you substantiate your claim that no Treaty enacted before the ratification of the UN Charter is valid today unless that Treaty has been 'registered' with the UN...

 

[Indeependent]

Still waiting for someone, anyone, to name the still in-effect international law that gives Jerusalem to Israel.

Perhaps you'll find someone willing to give you that answer...

Right after you complete your homework assignment from last night...

You know...

The assignment where you substantiate your claim that no Treaty enacted before the ratification of the UN Charter is valid today unless that Treaty has been 'registered' with the UN...

Are you kidding?
I'm still waiting over a month for vic to supply the name of a history book covering the Roman Conquest of Israel.
Vic rejects any and all non-pro Muslim history.

 

[MJB12741]

Oh now I get it. You see folks, the San Reno conference was 94 years ago so it's no longer valid. Just like the US Constitution of 1787 is no longer valid, right Vic?

Enough of the personal insults. Just because you lose every issue you debate there is no need to lose your temper.

Nothing has negated the San Remo Mandate. You should know that as it has been explained to you often enough.

The San Remo Conference was 94 years ago.

Its no longer valid, you idiot.

There is no international law that gives Jerusalem to Israel.

 

[Indeependent]

94 years old?
Ancient History!

 

[Victory67]

Oh now I get it. You see folks, the San Reno conference was 94 years ago so it's no longer valid. Just like the US Constitution of 1787 is no longer valid, right Vic?

The San Remo Conference has been superceded by the UN recognition of the State of Israel, and the UN resolutions calling for the implementation of UN resolution 181, which Israel agreed to.

Israel agreed to UN Resolution 181, which does not recognize Jerusalem as belonging to Israel.

 

[Indeependent]

Oh now I get it. You see folks, the San Reno conference was 94 years ago so it's no longer valid. Just like the US Constitution of 1787 is no longer valid, right Vic?

The San Remo Conference has been superceded by the UN recognition of the State of Israel, and the UN resolutions calling for the implementation of UN resolution 181, which Israel agreed to.

Israel agreed to UN Resolution 181, which does not recognize Jerusalem as belonging to Israel.

I guess it's time for an Amendment.
You know, just like the Bill of Rights, otherwise known as the 10 Amendments.
I know that won't make you happy butt it will prevent a lot of dead Muslims.

 

[Victory67]

still waiting for someone to name that international law that gives Jerusalem to Israel.