Nice exercise in taking something out-of-context, little Palestinian propaganda shill.
The entire segment (and the point being made therein) reads as follows...
Maybe there is.
Maybe there isn't.
But it doesn't matter.
Israel holds it, and will continue to hold it.
It's theirs now.
The point of the exercise being that Jerusalem is back in the hands of the Jews again for the first time in 1900-some-odd years, and that it's going to stay that way, now.
You're very welcome to believe that I don't have the 'chops' to be in this conversation. I do love it so when arrogant Goebbels-wannabes like yourself make that mistake.
I merely point-out that the existence of International Law supporting or contesting Israel's right to Jerusalem doesn't matter a damn in the Real World that most of us (with a few exceptions, such as yourself) inhabit.
Jerusalem is the Heart and Soul of Eretz Yisrael and you may never have it back again, without destroying Israel and climbing over the dead bodies of its Jews, in order to get it.
Metaphorically speaking, the Jews of the world have been singing 'Next year in Jerusalem' since 70 A.D.
And then they made that a Reality in 1967, after the Jordanians so foolishly attacked them, and got their nasty asses kicked, and lost the West Bank and the Holy City to the Jews.
Both sides may bring elements of International Law to bear upon the question, and both sides may interpret that law and the conditions such law observes and establishes, in order to reinforce their claims, so that it becomes another hopelessly tangled mess.
But Israel has chosen to simply cut the Gordian Knot in this case, rather than condemning itself to a fruitless and pointless exercise in trying to un-tie it.
In the final analysis, possession is 9/10 of the law, and the power to sustain that possession is the other 1/10 - and the Israelis own that poker hand in the Real World, not the Palestinians.
Between that Reality, and having waited 1900 years to get Jerusalem back, anyone who genuinely believes that International Law - one way or another - has any substantive and operative bearing upon the Jews' continued possession of Jerusalem, is as foolish as the Jordanians who gave the Israelis the excuse they needed to take it all back - for keeps.
That, too, was the point being made, for anyone of even average intelligence who has been engaged in related conversations over time, and who truly understood what they were dealing with, in connection with the value placed upon Jerusalem, and the non-negotiable status of the Holy City, in the hearts and minds of most Jews worthy of the name.
The fact that you cherry-picked a fragment of that modest, plain-spoken and inter-dependent text segment, and ignored the meat (substance) of the thing, in connection with so significant a point, just to take a cheap shot at someone, speaks volumes about your intellectual integrity and your own 'street-cred' for participating in such discussions with the grownups.
Back to the Kiddie Table for you, child... try again later, once you've thought things through a little better.
