International 9/11 poll

[Zebra]

No, on the al-Jazeera website there was an article about a year ago with al-Qaeda taking credit. I have it somewhere but I don't feel like finding it at the moment.

They must be getting really pissed off, having gone to all that trouble and now a large part of the population doesn't even believe they exist let alone did 9/11. They're POed because the conspiracists are erasing their terrorist street cred.

No, on the al-Jazeera website there was an article about a year ago with al-Qaeda taking credit. I have it somewhere but I don't feel like finding it at the moment.

They must be getting really pissed off, having gone to all that trouble and now a large part of the population doesn't even believe they exist let alone did 9/11. They're POed because the conspiracists are erasing their terrorist street cred.

eell


well said!

 

[Mack Brazile]

 

[Skylar]

that's right the research scientist, top gun pilots ,cia, fbi agents astronauts nasa researchers...there all just going blah blah and are cuckoo... in brains little pin head world ( hey was it not you that said they just came out of marine boot camp months ago ? and posted some gay before and after photos? wtf are you still doing here ?

I don't see how the assessment of a 'obvious demolition' by a dude with zero expertise in demolition is actual evidence. He's telling us what he thinks it looks like. Which doesn't amount to much.

 

[PeterPilot]

I don't see how the assessment of a 'obvious demolition' by a dude with zero expertise in demolition is actual evidence. He's telling us what he thinks it looks like. Which doesn't amount to much.

What about the analyses and conclusions of several thousand architects and engineers? Does that amount to anything to you?

 

[Skylar]

What about the analyses and conclusions of several thousand architects and engineers? Does that amount to anything to you?

Are you quoting several thousand architects and engineers? Or are you quoting army intelligence officers.....on controlled demolition.

And of course, can you show us ANY controlled demolition that starts midway in the building, and proceeds one floor at a time to the ground? Or is SILENT?

Of course not. There was no residue of explosive demolition in any of the dust samples. There was no apparatus of explosive demolition every found in any tower, not a single charge, not a single inch of blasting wire, not a single transceiver, not a single kicker charge, not a single girder cut in a manner consistent with explosive demolition.

The Port Authority sent bomb sniffing dogs to the WTC a WEEK before the attack and they found nothing. t would have taken 10s of thousands of charges to bring down the WTC in the manner we saw.

And not ONE was every found. Before, during, or after.

These buildings weren't museums. They were 95% occupied, with maintenance crews, officer workers, janitors, and security all over them. There's zero change that 10s of thousands of charges could have been laid over months or years and no one saw anything. And zero chance that they could have been laid in the week between the Port Authority's bomb squad check and the attack.

The Truther 'bomb' theory is just the worst, most useless explanation. And of course, backed by jackshit.

 

[Soupnazi630]

What about the analyses and conclusions of several thousand architects and engineers? Does that amount to anything to you?

There was no such analysis of thousands of engineers or architects.

Do not start with AE911 truth they are a fraudulent group

 

[PeterPilot]

Skylar

All your posts make it sound like you work for Bellingcat or some other propaganda outfit pushing official government narratives. Would you have me believe that Ukraine is winning their war? Would you have me believe that Bill Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman? Or that Saddam had WMD? You're funny.