I don't think that who is getting killed is less important than the weapon used. You are the one who introduced that premise, not I.
You failed to address the main point of my post: Put a gun under the seat of every car on the road and see what the result it. The result, of course, will be that more road rage incidents will be resolved by gunshots than before, more people will be wounded and/or killed.
Not good.
There are good reasons why firearms were invented? Why WERE firearms invented, hmmmmm?
So George, tell us where that is occuring. AZ and VY have no laws for the carrying of concealed weapons. If you want to do so you may. No permit, no nothing. Where are all the cases of road rage shootouts?
It seems reasonable to me to assume that if every car had a gun under the seat, the incidents of road rage shootings would increase. That's all I am saying. We don't have stats on how many guns are in cars in AZ and VY - probably more than prior to the enactment of the laws allowing carrying, but I'll bet there isn't a gun under the seat of every car in those states.
Can you tell me there HAVEN'T BEEN any road rage shootouts in those states and, if there have been, how many?
Look - I'm just arguing something by way of reasonable inference. The position I am taking seems reasonable to me. I could be way off base. I could be spot on. Frankly, I don't feel like taking the time to hunt down statistics on this point, even if any such existed - which I doubt.