Increasing public unrest in Israel

Why "destroy Hamas" if in so doing one creates so much hatred that the next Hamas will make this one look like a bunch of girl scouts? doesn't sound very intelligent to me, Israel might be right now - unwittingly - creating the basis for a future Oct 7th but ten times worse.

Of course you'd never blame Netanyahu or the Knesset for this, you'll still continue to bang your head against the wall an insist it is all the fault of "the Arabs".

Israel does not know how to live in peace with its neighbors and it never did even before 1948, it says it wants peace but acts in such a way to guarantee it will never get peace, curiously Zionists just cannot see it that way, the only way they know to interpret everything is by the narrative that the Jews are victims, the Jews are always victims, never the victimizer, that's always the starting point that every Zionist starts from.

Any reaction to Israeli violence is always seen as the initiator of violence, the ideology is so far gone that the entire nation almost, have lost their minds, the place is doomed and the sooner its gone the better.

The Zionists need to start listening to proper Jews and put an end to their worship of violence:

View attachment 1008816

You keep persecuting and abusing people you keep getting attacked, you wanna argue with Einstein?

"Because Islamist degeneracy is always someone else fault"

by that the free world have submitted to Germany.

Don't you know where your filth all end up?
 
Israel is not committing ethnic cleansing of any territory and comparing a war as a consequence of belligerent invasion of a sovereign State and committing atrocities upon her citizens with genocidal intent to the Holocaust is vile.

Sigh. Once again. Jeez, I only typed this last night. No. This is patently and verifiably false. Protected places only remain protected when they are not used for military purposes and are free from military objectives. If a military objective is within a protected place, that protected place loses its protected status. The war crime is committed by those who use a protected place for military purposes. That's the law.
Yes but there must be evidence that this was the case and there never is, Israel doesn't care about that. There's no evidence whatsoever that any of these places were being used in such a way that military force becomes authorized under international law, its a very high bar if you care to look.

In the real world a claim by the IDF or Nazinyahu or Beelzebub Snotrich isn't credible evidence.

Israel is not subject to the law, that's the problem.
 
The Arabs have a right - in law, in the UN charter - to resist foreign invaders. If the invaders leave the illegally occupied lands then they'll see less resistance to that occupation.
Where do you come up with this stuff? No, they don't. And even if they did, the Jewish people are neither foreigners nor invaders. They are indigenous people.
 
Where do you come up with this stuff? No, they don't. And even if they did, the Jewish people are neither foreigners nor invaders. They are indigenous people.
They are at least 50% now, Europeans or descendants of Europeans. Most of them came from Europe their families have centuries of European culture, language, music, science and art, they were invited and encouraged to swarm into Israel years before any Holocaust in order to swell the numbers and alter the demographics.

This is what colonizers do, just like in the US thousands and thousands of people migrated there as the natives were being massacred and herded into "reservations" the US did what Israel is doing.

They cannot prove they are in any way indigenous, a man saying "I'm a Jew" does not automatically get a right to evict an Arab family and steal their land, not in the real world anyway.
 
Last edited:
What is your primary source document for this?
Here print a copy and send it to Nazinyahu, although he'll probably just wipe his @ss with it.

Children and armed conflict.

I'm fully expecting the usual bleatings and apologetics and excuses and claims that Israel's situation is special and so on and so forth. But forget that, I won't respond or argue, leave that to the Judges and prosecutors.
 
Last edited:
Here print a copy and send it to Nazinyahu, although he'll probably just wipe his @ss with it.

Children and armed conflict.

I'm fully expecting the usual bleatings and apologetics and excuses and claims that Israel's situation is special and so on and so forth. But forget that, I won't respond or argue, leave that to the Judges and prosecutors.
Do you know what a primary source document is?
 
They are at least 50% now, Europeans or descendants of Europeans. Most of them came from Europe their families have centuries of European culture, language, music, science and art, ...

This is what colonizers do, just like in the US thousands and thousands of people migrated there as the natives were being massacred and herded into "reservations" the US did what Israel is doing.

They cannot prove they are in any way indigenous,...

You have a poor understanding of what it means to be indigenous. The Jewish people have a distinct and recognizable culture that has been carried with them in the diaspora. They are descendants of the Jewish people, regardless of where in the world they found themselves. The Jewish culture is easily recognizable in our language, legal system, rituals, holidays, life celebrations, style of dress, social conventions and all of these cultural realities are directly reflected in the history of the land of Israel.
 
Would then kindly provide me the primary source document you are using to make the claim "there must be evidence" for a protected place to lose its protected status as a point of law and not opinion.
 
They are at least 50% now, Europeans or descendants of Europeans. Most of them came from Europe their families have centuries of European culture,

Majority of Israelis are refugees expelled for Arab occupied colonies.

Remind us Adolf, how's that called when you wage wars
against those framed as the "wrong race"?
 
Would then kindly provide me the primary source document you are using to make the claim "there must be evidence" for a protected place to lose its protected status as a point of law and not opinion.
That's obvious, if one is charged with a war crime for authorizing schools to be bombed, then unless one has evidence that it was - in law - a legitimate target, then the court could argue that if there's no evidence then how can one have supported the decisions to bomb children?
 
Majority of Israelis are refugees expelled for Arab occupied colonies.
1725919745337.png


Not forgetting of course that 6,000,000 European Jews were slaughtered not by Arabic Muslims but by European Christians.
Remind us Adolf, how's that called when you wage war
against those framed as the "wrong race"?
Zionism?
 
That's obvious, if one is charged with a war crime for authorizing schools to be bombed, then unless one has evidence that it was - in law - a legitimate target, then the court could argue that if there's no evidence then how can one have supported the decisions to bomb children?
Thank you for your opinion. Do you have a primary source document or not?
 
I already did.
Do did not. You provided a "guidance note" on an entirely different subject, with no reference to a legal requirement to collect evidence and what form that might take.
 
I agree, everyone with a brain anyway, now knows that the Israelis never wanted a two state solution, the Arabs knew that too when they rejected the imperialists plans for redrawing maps.

The Zionist project need to be terminated before we all go down the toilet.
You and the pals make it clear that peace is impossible as long as Israel exists

Dont blame Jews for not wanting to commit suicide
 
Do did not. You provided a "guidance note" on an entirely different subject, with no reference to a legal requirement to collect evidence and what form that might take.
Well I'm sorry that doesn't meet your expectations.
 
Back
Top Bottom