- Jul 1, 2024
- 11,790
- 4,574
- 188
- Thread starter
- #361
You claimed that Israel was not a terrorist state, I provided three sources to show that I did not just make up this idea, there are many more too.So, by your logic here, the academic paper with just a single author that you posted, carries more weigh and is less likely to be biased than the official position of 12 countries.
It’s not what was in the paper. It’s the logical failing of your argument. If we can’t trust the position of 12 countries, why should we trust the guy who wrote the paper you posted? Since that is your argument, why would you even post that paper?
You tell me now that you reject what is said in one of the articles but also tell me you haven't read the articles.
I do not dispute that there are countries declaring Hamas to be a terrorist organization, and I do not dispute the designation, I get that.
What I am asking you is why do you reject the reports that demonstrate state terrorism in Israel? if you haven't read them how can you evaluate and reject them?
Would you only believe negative claims about Israel if they appeared in reports published by the Knesset? is that it?