Incompetent DOJ

[kyzr]

The DoJ lawyer should have made sure the order was followed in the two weeks since it was issued. If he had done that, he wouldn't have been so clueless. If they're violating the court order, they should be held in contempt.

Read #20

 

[Contumacious]

A judge does not order POTUS around
One unelected and biased party does not vacate the will of the people . The EO clarified this. Trump is currently and correctly ignoring these impermissible personal feelings edicts.

You are 100% Correct that the Separation of Powers Doctrine prevents the Legislative and Judicial Branches from encroaching into the Executive,

But in DC those bastards are POLITICIANS IN BLACK ROBES so they will do whatever is necessary to impede the MAGA progress, ANd so it goes.

 

[Marener]

Read #20

You guys are getting more and more fascist.

If the judiciary has no authority over the president, then the law means nothing anymore.

 

[Marener]

You are 100% Correct that the Separation of Powers Doctrine prevents the Legislative and Judicial Branches from encroaching into the Executive,

But in DC those bastards are POLITICIANS IN BLACK ROBES so they will do whatever is necessary to impede the MAGA progress, ANd so it goes.

The authority of the executive is not unlimited and the judiciary isn't encroaching on anything by making them follow the law.

 

[Contumacious]

The authority of the executive is not unlimited and the judiciary isn't encroaching on anything by making them follow the law.

Identify by Article, Section and Clause the Constitutional proviso which identifes what the Limits of Article II are

.

 

[WEATHER53]

The authority of the executive is not unlimited and the judiciary isn't encroaching on anything by making them follow the law.

One judges feelings is not the law of the land. The judicial is comprised of hundreds and hundreds and not merely one judge pretending to be some authority for that entire branch
Trump as the executive does have such imbued one person authority. It’s why there are not a dozen Presidents

 

[Marener]

Identify by Article, Section and Clause the Constitutional proviso which identifes what the Limits of Article II are

.

Well, for starters section 1, clause 1 gives him executive authority. It does not give him judicial or legislative authority.

 

[Marener]

One judges feelings is not the law of the land. The judicial is comprised of hundreds and hundreds and not merely one judge pretending to be some authority for that entire branch
Trump as the executive does have such imbued one person authority. It’s why there are not a dozen Presidents

One judge's ruling is binding, even to the president, until such time it is overturned by a higher court.

 

[okfine]

Butthurt tards. As usual.

 

[WEATHER53]

Butthurt tards. As usual.

No refuting content
As always

 

[WEATHER53]

One judge's ruling is binding, even to the president, until such time it is overturned by a higher court.

We are in the process of seeing how unbinding one persons feeling are for a juducary branch not comprised of a mere half dozen, nor one, but of many hundreds.
One legislative member cannot solely declare nor prohibit , Jack shit. Are they not “co equal branches” as you loons constantly fall back on.? What you profess is that one judge is more powerful than the senate, the house, and POTUS.

 

[BackAgain]

Butthurt tards. As usual.

I applaud your self description.

 

[kyzr]

You guys are getting more and more fascist.

If the judiciary has no authority over the president, then the law means nothing anymore.

What Law?

Read the Constitution. Article 2, low level judges aren't mentioned as able to direct the president.

 

[Marener]

We are in the process of seeing how unbinding one persons feeling are for a legislative branch not comprised of a mere half dozen, nor one, but of many hundreds.

Great. Dismantling the constitution. You must be so proud.

 

[Marener]

What Law?

Read the Constitution. Article 2, low level judges aren't mentioned as able to direct the president.

Pretty sure the founders expected the president to follow the law. Do you disagree?

 

[WEATHER53]

Great. Dismantling the constitution. You must be so proud.

Try reading it first. Nowhere is it referenced that one appointed judge can set aside Presidential directives

 

[Marener]

Try reading it first. Nowhere is it referenced that one appointed judge can set aside Presidential directives

Since the constitution gives judicial power in all cases or controversies with US law, it absolutely does.

 

[Nostra]

Not prepared.
Inept.
Incompetent.

They are Trumps personal lawyers
Go figure.

Court hearing goes 'exceptionally badly' for Trump DOJ as judge loses patience: reporter

Politico legal reporter Kyle Cheney on Tuesday brought word that the Trump Department of Justice stumbled badly in trying to justify freezing funds for the United States Agency for International Development.During a hearing in front of United States District Court for the District of Columbia...

www.rawstory.com

Rawstory?