Zone1 Income inequality can be a a real thing.....

you think a family who saved and invested and made money some how owes you?
Outrageously Underpaid Talent Creates All the Wealth of the Plutocracy

They owe the next generation a level playing field. Placing their heirs halfway to the finish line demoralizes the next generation, as we have seen and will see worse.

HeirDads must be dispossessed of the privilege of determining winners and losers of their heirs' generation.
 
Wannabes Shouldntabeen

The talented shouldn't have to choose;
why not? Are you saying no one has the right to seek more money?
they must be chosen.
by who? Is there a list of all citizens and their talents/ values?
Just like all those who want to be major-college quarterbacks can't follow that delusion, because sports are based on talent, not soul-killing sacrifice or Daddy's Money.
Not sure what this statement is. College's seek out the best and sign them. Again, your lack of business is insulting me.
 
i honestly can't understand how you all hate successful people who risk most everything to make a big chunk of coin!!!! There's nothing equal here. go the **** away, useless sheep.
Another dumb ace I guess (sorry), that doesn't understand the premise of this OP, and more or less what it is actually questioning. Most of the time I agree with my MAGA friends and allies because I'm a MAGA myself, but then times like these concerning specific issue's causes people like you to just go stupid and me to begin scratching my head.

So you agree with people like Erick Swalwell, Pelosi, Biden, AOC. Ilhan Omar, and all the other's not mentioned, uh being 30 times wealthier than say a common person who loves and honors God, has grit, personality, common sense, a moral compass built in, hard work ethic, family oriented, straight, Chistain, an honest tax payer, charity worker, great citizen, helpful, anti-corrupt, loves his or her nation as an American type of citizen ????????????

Do you think that the above mentioned (Pelosi, AOC and the like), are your typical honest wealthy people who are risking everything to make in your words a "chunk of coin" ??? Does the word income inequality fit when talking about the differences in who is holding the wealth and power between these two types of group's or individual's mentioned in this post ??
 
Last edited:
many of those idiots end up making millions. school isn't for everybody. I bet Musk wasn't a scholarly guy.
Not sure if you got the gest of his post.
 
Outrageously Underpaid Talent Creates All the Wealth of the Plutocracy

They owe the next generation a level playing field. Placing their heirs halfway to the finish line demoralizes the next generation, as we have seen and will see worse.

HeirDads must be dispossessed of the privilege of determining winners and losers of their heirs' generation.
Especially when we see what is going on today in it all.

Profit sharing programs should be required of all companies operating in America. The wealth should be shared based upon the merits and sticking power of the employee's who should be included in the profit sharing of a company, otherwise profits that are generated by all participants involved in the process. How hard can this be really ? It's a win for all...

Now I will say that companies are doing a lot better in this than they use to do, so mega handshakes to them for finally realizing that a proper profit sharing company that is paying above and beyond average wages, otherwise that is set up to pay out to it's best employee's down to it's average employee's in a merited system that rewards extra efforts and staying power is the best companies who finally get it.
 
Last edited:
why not? Are you saying no one has the right to seek more money?

by who? Is there a list of all citizens and their talents/ values?

Not sure what this statement is. College's seek out the best and sign them. Again, your lack of business is insulting me.
Your lack of understanding is insulting.
 
The employee helped make a profit, and that’s why he’s getting paid. That’s the owner sharing the profit.
Is the profit sharing being gauged right or does greed and corruption sometimes play a role ??? At what point does red flags begin to fly in your mind ?

Are you ok with Bernie Sanders wealth verses the average Joe's hard earned wealth, and then Bernie attacking the wealthy like he's poor in America ?
 
Redo - Is "income inequality" a real thing between the idiots and the good folks struggling in America because of the idiots these day's ???
 
Is the profit sharing being gauged right or does greed and corruption sometimes play a role ??? At what point does red flags begin to fly in your mind ?

Are you ok with Bernie Sanders wealth verses the average Joe's hard earned wealth, and then Bernie attacking the wealthy like he's poor in America ?
No politician should be allowed to invest or take money from lobbyists. Take money out of politics. Seems I’m the only one demanding that
 
Redo - Is "income inequality" a real thing between the idiots and the good folks struggling in America because of the idiots these day's ???
Not sure you’d understand
 
The employee helped make a profit, and that’s why he’s getting paid. That’s the owner sharing the profit.
If Someone Owns a Man's Work, He Owns That Man

Rightist oinkonomics is one-sided and upside-down. That's the key distortion in, "To Get a Good Job, Get a Good Education."

Under this oligarchic scheme, we can't tell them what they must do to get good work from us. If they want Cash Cows, they should buy a ranch.

Market forces aren't inanimate. They are based on what clique has the most force.
 
If Someone Owns a Man's Work, He Owns That Man

Rightist oinkonomics is one-sided and upside-down. That's the key distortion in, "To Get a Good Job, Get a Good Education."

Under this oligarchic scheme, we can't tell them what they must do to get good work from us. If they want Cash Cows, they should buy a ranch.

Market forces aren't inanimate. They are based on what clique has the most force.
The man is free to sell his work to a different employer, if he thinks he can get paid more.

Nobody owns anybody. We eradicated slavery.
 
expand on this? What is it you're trying to say?
A Parasite for Preppy Plutocratic Parasites

Profit is a tax. Therefore, an independent mind should question not only how much profit goes to the top, but the validity of the owner's claim about how much he needs to motivate him to stay in business. You take a pay cut so the boss can buy a Beamer for his 16-year-old brat. In other words, the private sector is just another form of government in every way. For example, customers equal voters.
 
A Parasite for Preppy Plutocratic Parasites

Profit is a tax. Therefore, an independent mind should question not only how much profit goes to the top, but the validity of the owner's claim about how much he needs to motivate him to stay in business. You take a pay cut so the boss can buy a Beamer for his 16-year-old brat. In other words, the private sector is just another form of government in every way. For example, customers equal voters.
in english please.
 
You don’t think talented people should need to choose their employer? That’s what people do: they weigh offers and select the best option.

But of course, the flip side is that they WERE chosen by the employer as well. They had the talents the company was looking for.
Baseball for Brown-Noses and Bluebloods

Then the company should pay them in advance to develop the talents that are useful to the company, just like baseball signs up and pays talented 18-year-old to train in the minor leagues, baseball's equivalent of what unpaid and unnatural college education is supposed to do for the corporations.

When I was a pre-teen, the total social value of a kid was how well he played in the Little League. That immediate reward was what made me realize how incredibly different mental talent is treated. Imagine how pathetic our pro baseball players would be if they were limited to those who'd be willing to take out a loan to pay the minor leagues and live like young adults who are afraid to grow up until they made the majors or quit baseball in disgust.

Therefore, at least the most talented students should unionize and force the issue. After the athletes did that, they earned a hundred times more than the pre-union players had. Without figuring out inflation, take an example like 20-game winner Jim Bouton, who got only $18,000 when today he'd get $18,000,000.
 
15th post
Man Against Millionaire Is Not a Freedom Situation
First, who says that business owners are millionaires? Most are Mom and Pop shops.

Second, the employee is always free to leave if he thinks his market value is greater elsewhere. His choice.

I myself once took a job that paid $10,000 less than what I could get elsewhere. But it was a 10-minute walk from my home.
 
Baseball for Brown-Noses and Bluebloods

Then the company should pay them in advance to develop the talents that are useful to the company, just like baseball signs up and pays talented 18-year-old to train in the minor leagues, baseball's equivalent of what unpaid and unnatural college education is supposed to do for the corporations.

When I was a pre-teen, the total social value of a kid was how well he played in the Little League. That immediate reward was what made me realize how incredibly different mental talent is treated. Imagine how pathetic our pro baseball players would be if they were limited to those who'd be willing to take out a loan to pay the minor leagues and live like young adults who are afraid to grow up until they made the majors or quit baseball in disgust.

Therefore, at least the most talented students should unionize and force the issue. After the athletes did that, they earned a hundred times more than the pre-union players had. Without figuring out inflation, take an example like 20-game winner Jim Bouton, who got only $18,000 when today he'd get $18,000,000.
Not clear your direction, but you can do what it is you want to with your own company! Take care. BTW, no one will ever work for you
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom