Income Inequailty Rhetoric is Class Warfare

[rightwinger]

Conservatives must think that people are idiots if they expect others to believe that workers can be engaging in class warfare just by noting an increasing disparity in pay when they have no control over it.

How about they earn it instead of text on there phone and ask do you want Fries with that?

Such a high opinion of the American worker

 

[Indeependent]

so you agree you are finally happy with a handout. good.

now go get a cookie.

Wow! A CONSERVATIVE Conservative!
Just admit you have MAJOR gaps in your historical knowledge.
Didn't know about Oct 1987!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP LISTENING TO RUSH!

make it all red, size 5 font, otherwise your shrieking is barely heard.

Then why respond, oh, lacker of recent historical knowledge?

You know what's cool?
If you knew about Oct 1987, you weren't expecting anyone else to know.
If you didn't know, you are now suspect regarding any economic history you post.
Well, guess what?
I know.
Sucks for U!

 

[Wyatt earp]

I think earing a living is deleted from the liberal dictionary now a days... just a thought.

 

[Vox]

Wow! A CONSERVATIVE Conservative!
Just admit you have MAJOR gaps in your historical knowledge.
Didn't know about Oct 1987!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP LISTENING TO RUSH!

make it all red, size 5 font, otherwise your shrieking is barely heard.

Then why respond, oh, lacker of recent historical knowledge?

You know what's cool?
If you knew about Oct 1987, you weren't expecting anyone else to know.
If you didn't know, you are now suspect regarding any economic history you post.
Well, guess what?
I know.
Sucks for U!

are you a total idiot? you consider yourself worth serious response to after the last 2 -3 pages?

or you are just an obama variety narcissist that views himself irresistible?

then you are wrong.

it isn't so.

 

[Indeependent]

make it all red, size 5 font, otherwise your shrieking is barely heard.

Then why respond, oh, lacker of recent historical knowledge?

You know what's cool?
If you knew about Oct 1987, you weren't expecting anyone else to know.
If you didn't know, you are now suspect regarding any economic history you post.
Well, guess what?
I know.
Sucks for U!

are you a total idiot? you consider yourself worth serious response to after the last 2 -3 pages?

or you are just an obama variety narcissist that views himself irresistible?

then you are wrong.

it isn't so.

I'm not a fan of Obama.
But I'm also not a fan of GW.

And if I'm so impertinent, why are you repeatedly reply to my postings?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Conservatives must think that people are idiots if they expect others to believe that workers can be engaging in class warfare just by noting an increasing disparity in pay when they have no control over it.

How about they earn it instead of text on there phone and ask do you want Fries with that?

Such a high opinion of the American worker

I work with them every day. They are always on there phones. Texting and stuff. And I seriously getting tired of it. A phone call is fine. But the new technology is making people not concentrate on there jobs. They try but get distracted way to easy.

First you had management. ******* off on computers with the net now you have operators ******* off with the texting and on the net. This is getting bad.

 

[Vox]

Then why respond, oh, lacker of recent historical knowledge?

You know what's cool?
If you knew about Oct 1987, you weren't expecting anyone else to know.
If you didn't know, you are now suspect regarding any economic history you post.
Well, guess what?
I know.
Sucks for U!

are you a total idiot? you consider yourself worth serious response to after the last 2 -3 pages?

or you are just an obama variety narcissist that views himself irresistible?

then you are wrong.

it isn't so.

I'm not a fan of Obama.
But I'm also not a fan of GW.

And if I'm so impertinent, why are you repeatedly reply to my postings?

because I find it amusing. especially your lies.
and gross incompetence.

 

[rightwinger]

How about they earn it instead of text on there phone and ask do you want Fries with that?

Such a high opinion of the American worker

I work with them every day. They are always on there phones. Texting and stuff. And I seriously getting tired of it. A phone call is fine. But the new technology is making people not concentrate on there jobs. They try but get distracted way to easy.

First you had management. ******* off on computers with the net now you have operators ******* off with the texting and on the net. This is getting bad.

An expert on sampling also

 

[Erand7899]

What if the guy who earns $100K a year earns it by means of a monopoly on gasoline and charges the $15K guy $20 for a gallon?

Perhaps this will clue you in to the difference between a natural concentration of wealth and an unnatural one. What we have today is an unnatural concentration of wealth.


And the REAL income gap is much, much more than $85K.

You only get an unnatural concentration of wealth when criminal activity, such as graft, corruption and/or theft, is involved. The expanding income inequality in America is simply the concept of compound interest (read return on investment), and can be easily explained with simple math and common sense.

a. The magic number for doubling wealth (or income from wealth) is 72. Divide the rate of return into 72, and the dividend is the number of years needed to double that investment. This applies equally for $1 or $1,000,000.

b. If you start with $1,000 and a 6% annual rate of return, you can double that investment in 12 years. You now have $2,000.

c. If you start with $10,000 and 6% annual rate of return, you also double that investment in 12 years. You now have $20,000.

d. If you start with $10,000,000, and the same rate of return, you double to $20,000,000 in those same 12 years.

Consequently, when you start at a higher point, the amount earned is far greater, and explains why the rich almost always get richer, regardless of the economic condition of the economy. No conspiracy, no unnatural advantage, just simple math.

Oh.pease are you that stupid and didn't take in the equation of your math of the feds pumping in 85 billioon a.month into wall street a month? All Obama and the feds are doing is making Wall street rich with monopoly money and making main street poor.

The feds have not yet repealed the laws of math, or altered the effects of compounding interest. The concept, that under identical conditions, the person starting with the higher number will earn more on his investment holds true regardless of what the fed does.

I do not disagree with you on the idiocy of current fed policy, the bubble they have created, or the fact that the stock market will tumble when it breaks. However, that doesn't have a damn thing to do with main street or the poor.

If you are looking for the boogyman that is killing economic recover, look at the Dodd Frank bill, and its effects on the smaller banks. Also, look at the dumbass over regulation being imposed on business by the Obama administration.

 

[Indeependent]

are you a total idiot? you consider yourself worth serious response to after the last 2 -3 pages?

or you are just an obama variety narcissist that views himself irresistible?

then you are wrong.

it isn't so.

I'm not a fan of Obama.
But I'm also not a fan of GW.

And if I'm so impertinent, why are you repeatedly reply to my postings?

because I find it amusing. especially your lies.
and gross incompetence.

As I am constantly working on improving myself please elaborate.
Be very specific.

 

[Wyatt earp]

And I am a nice guy but when A guy is driving a forklift and on the internet or texting with his left hand..... you have to say WOA.... what is this stuff?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wow! A CONSERVATIVE Conservative!
Just admit you have MAJOR gaps in your historical knowledge.
Didn't know about Oct 1987!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP LISTENING TO RUSH!

make it all red, size 5 font, otherwise your shrieking is barely heard.

Then why respond, oh, lacker of recent historical knowledge?

You know what's cool?
If you knew about Oct 1987, you weren't expecting anyone else to know.
If you didn't know, you are now suspect regarding any economic history you post.
Well, guess what?
I know.
Sucks for U!

What do you know?

 

[Indeependent]

make it all red, size 5 font, otherwise your shrieking is barely heard.

Then why respond, oh, lacker of recent historical knowledge?

You know what's cool?
If you knew about Oct 1987, you weren't expecting anyone else to know.
If you didn't know, you are now suspect regarding any economic history you post.
Well, guess what?
I know.
Sucks for U!

What do you know?

Backtrack about 10-15 postings and you'll know what I know.
C'mon, don't tell me YOU didn't know about the Reagan inspired George Bush Oct 1987 crash?

 

[Vox]

You only get an unnatural concentration of wealth when criminal activity, such as graft, corruption and/or theft, is involved. The expanding income inequality in America is simply the concept of compound interest (read return on investment), and can be easily explained with simple math and common sense.

a. The magic number for doubling wealth (or income from wealth) is 72. Divide the rate of return into 72, and the dividend is the number of years needed to double that investment. This applies equally for $1 or $1,000,000.

b. If you start with $1,000 and a 6% annual rate of return, you can double that investment in 12 years. You now have $2,000.

c. If you start with $10,000 and 6% annual rate of return, you also double that investment in 12 years. You now have $20,000.

d. If you start with $10,000,000, and the same rate of return, you double to $20,000,000 in those same 12 years.

Consequently, when you start at a higher point, the amount earned is far greater, and explains why the rich almost always get richer, regardless of the economic condition of the economy. No conspiracy, no unnatural advantage, just simple math.

Oh.pease are you that stupid and didn't take in the equation of your math of the feds pumping in 85 billioon a.month into wall street a month? All Obama and the feds are doing is making Wall street rich with monopoly money and making main street poor.

The feds have not yet repealed the laws of math, or altered the effects of compounding interest. The concept, that under identical conditions, the person starting with the higher number will earn more on his investment holds true regardless of what the fed does.

I do not disagree with you on the idiocy of current fed policy, the bubble they have created, or the fact that the stock market will tumble when it breaks. However, that doesn't have a damn thing to do with main street or the poor.

If you are looking for the boogyman that is killing economic recover, look at the Dodd Frank bill, and its effects on the smaller banks. Also, look at the dumbass over regulation being imposed on business by the Obama administration.

^^^this

 

[Vox]

I'm not a fan of Obama.
But I'm also not a fan of GW.

And if I'm so impertinent, why are you repeatedly reply to my postings?

because I find it amusing. especially your lies.
and gross incompetence.

As I am constantly working on improving myself please elaborate.
Be very specific.

yawn

all your posts for the last 4 pages.
starting with #56

 

[Indeependent]

because I find it amusing. especially your lies.
and gross incompetence.

As I am constantly working on improving myself please elaborate.
Be very specific.

yawn

all your posts for the last 4 pages.
starting with #56

As I just said another poster in another thread...
Whoever writes your material...Fire him!

BTW, are you doing your 18 year old "Na, na, na,na, na!" Victory Dance in your room yet for that latest non-witty remark?

 

[thereisnospoon]

The rich call it class warfare when the slaves complain.....

That is exactly the issue. The playing field is tilted so heavily towards the wealthy that any attempt to equalize opportunity is decried as "Socialism"

Equal opportunity...Ok...In your own words, define that.
Then explain how this concept correlates to the ongoing class envy agenda perpetuated by liberals.

 

[Indeependent]

The rich call it class warfare when the slaves complain.....

That is exactly the issue. The playing field is tilted so heavily towards the wealthy that any attempt to equalize opportunity is decried as "Socialism"

Equal opportunity...Ok...In your own words, define that.
Then explain how this concept correlates to the ongoing class envy agenda perpetuated by liberals.

Oh, please.
An American can't even get an interview with a BETTER GPA than their fellow Indian foreign exchange student.
So stop the nonsense.

And no, raising taxes isn't the solution.
We have bad foreign trade deals and bad business visas policies.

 

[thereisnospoon]

It is not a question of taking from the rich and giving to the poor but one of....Why do we continue programs from 1980s supply side economics that favor the wealthy?

Trickle down never happened.....The wealthy just kept the money

What programs from the 1980s have we continued?

Tax rates, capital gains exemptions, subsidies, labor restirctions, deregulation

All of which have helped grow the private sector.
BTW, I find it amusing when you lib's hair begins to fall out whenever you hear the term "capital gains"....Right away your argument starts.."It's not fair they get to keep all that money."...."It should be taxed as income!"....
Why?
Keep in mind that any type of income derived from an intangible is considered a capital gain.
So before you answer the above question do some careful consideration.

 

[thereisnospoon]

It is not a question of taking from the rich and giving to the poor but one of....Why do we continue programs from 1980s supply side economics that favor the wealthy?

Trickle down never happened.....The wealthy just kept the money

first off the idea that wealthy people "just keep the money" is false. if that were true, there would be
NO business at all.
obviously the concept of trickle down escapes you.
its very easy.
Some one or a group decides to start a business. employees are hired to do the
work. in turn the employees spend their earnings at other busiu
they also pay taxes which fund government and education. the workers also buy homes
or rent housing. and so on.
somewhere along the line you libs created your own definition for trickle down
to mean " you have more than we do. you should surrender some
of your wealth so that we may share it."

It is not more money that drives economic expansion but more market. If I sell 1 million widget a year and suddenly my profit increases, I do not produce more widgets....I keep the profit

It is only if there are more people buying widgets that I increase production

"I keep the profit"...Precisely. Profit. That is the primary function of a for profit business.
Is there something wrong with that?
Here's the point of the trickle down motive. The factory in your scenario does what?
It EMPLOYS people. YES...They perform work. They GET PAID...And what do they do? They take their earnings and put at least some back into the economy.
This is not hard stuff.