Incitement Is An Act To Encourage--Crowd Assembly Pre-Meditated Or Not!

mascale

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
6,749
Reaction score
751
Points
130
Getting back to the Constitution--the pardon power is specifically a "Grant," so on behalf of some other person, not the President personally. Similarly, the charge of "Incitement" is not about asking fanatics to cross inter-state lines to assemble to hear remarks. That actually happened, in the matter of January 6. Once assembled, the the encouragement of a behavior outcome--a march to a location to fight like hell, or lose your nation forever--is the encouragement of the riot outcome.

.

Since the Trumped-Up, bogus "Demonstration," about an allegedly "Bogus Election," was clearly pre-meditated, in advance(?): Then the Personal Appearance at the assembly--exhorting the outcome expressed: Is an Incitement of the alleged, "Insurrection" level riot--details still pouring in. The capture and even assassination of elected officials was apparently a part of the pre-meditated plan, so in "Insurrection-Level" event.

Even back to the Pardon: Criminal Offenses are not a part of the job description, "President of the United States." No oath is taken on behalf of any. Nothing is created to "Assume" that the President is innocent of federal crimes, or any assumption of legal obligation to "Assume" the right of federal criminal activity.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(In America, people even pray for the federal crimes as a First Amendment protected behavior--likely priests and pastors would concur: Matt 25: 14-30!)
 

Sunsettommy

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
7,532
Reaction score
4,836
Points
1,050
Getting back to the Constitution--the pardon power is specifically a "Grant," so on behalf of some other person, not the President personally. Similarly, the charge of "Incitement" is not about asking fanatics to cross inter-state lines to assemble to hear remarks. That actually happened, in the matter of January 6. Once assembled, the the encouragement of a behavior outcome--a march to a location to fight like hell, or lose your nation forever--is the encouragement of the riot outcome.

.

Since the Trumped-Up, bogus "Demonstration," about an allegedly "Bogus Election," was clearly pre-meditated, in advance(?): Then the Personal Appearance at the assembly--exhorting the outcome expressed: Is an Incitement of the alleged, "Insurrection" level riot--details still pouring in. The capture and even assassination of elected officials was apparently a part of the pre-meditated plan, so in "Insurrection-Level" event.

Even back to the Pardon: Criminal Offenses are not a part of the job description, "President of the United States." No oath is taken on behalf of any. Nothing is created to "Assume" that the President is innocent of federal crimes, or any assumption of legal obligation to "Assume" the right of federal criminal activity.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(In America, people even pray for the federal crimes as a First Amendment protected behavior--likely priests and pastors would concur: Matt 25: 14-30!)
You didn't keep up with the news apparently see HERE.

You also didn't read the Transcript of his speech he was STILL doing when the break in occurred, which was 1 1/2 miles away. :laugh:

Trump was not involved.
 

Slade3200

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,663
Reaction score
5,967
Points
1,140
I stopped at "getting back to the constitution"..............lol. Leftists hate the constitution.
If you’re such an expert then why are you “stopping” when the topic of the constitution is brought up. Why not use your knowledge of it to make an intelligent counter argument instead of a meaningless insult?
 

LordBrownTrout

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
31,789
Reaction score
10,842
Points
1,400
Location
South Texas Republic
I stopped at "getting back to the constitution"..............lol. Leftists hate the constitution.
If you’re such an expert then why are you “stopping” when the topic of the constitution is brought up. Why not use your knowledge of it to make an intelligent counter argument instead of a meaningless insult?
I have, but with mascale its all gobbleygook. No one incited anything so there is no point to argue.
 

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
104,652
Reaction score
39,316
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Getting back to the Constitution--the pardon power is specifically a "Grant," so on behalf of some other person, not the President personally. Similarly, the charge of "Incitement" is not about asking fanatics to cross inter-state lines to assemble to hear remarks. That actually happened, in the matter of January 6. Once assembled, the the encouragement of a behavior outcome--a march to a location to fight like hell, or lose your nation forever--is the encouragement of the riot outcome.

.

Since the Trumped-Up, bogus "Demonstration," about an allegedly "Bogus Election," was clearly pre-meditated, in advance(?): Then the Personal Appearance at the assembly--exhorting the outcome expressed: Is an Incitement of the alleged, "Insurrection" level riot--details still pouring in. The capture and even assassination of elected officials was apparently a part of the pre-meditated plan, so in "Insurrection-Level" event.

Even back to the Pardon: Criminal Offenses are not a part of the job description, "President of the United States." No oath is taken on behalf of any. Nothing is created to "Assume" that the President is innocent of federal crimes, or any assumption of legal obligation to "Assume" the right of federal criminal activity.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(In America, people even pray for the federal crimes as a First Amendment protected behavior--likely priests and pastors would concur: Matt 25: 14-30!)

Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol
'The ones who were agitating the crowd were not Trump supporters'

An analysis of videos of the death of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt at the U.S. Capitol indicates Antifa activists provoked the fatal gunshot from a police officer. Japanese investigator Misako Ganaha explained in a video interview with Epoch Times reporter Joshua Philipp on his “Crossroads” program that she analyzed two lengthy videos, affording two different angles of the incident near the House chamber…. just prior to the shooting, two men who had been agitating the crowd broke the glass on a set of doors.

… the same Marxist “agitate and divide” tactics employed by leftists in her home country…. part of the tactic, she said, is for someone in collaboration with the agitators to serve as a “witness” to mainstream media, which tells the story “without analyzing.” Media simply repeats what the witness says, explained Ganaha, “so the world does not know the truth.” Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol

======================================================

“BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested

The Utah Black Lives Matter "activist" has been bragging about his involvement in instigating the Capitol riots. Now, he's been arrested.


The deadly riots at the Capitol last week that have sparked Big Tech cancelations and prompted another impeachment of President Trump were instigated in part by Black Lives Matter and Antifa “activists,” according to multiple media reports. One of the highest profile suspects, John Earle Sullivan from Utah, has been arrested.”

This story will be buried by mainstream media and suppressed by Big Tech. The arrest of John Earle Sullivan, a known Black Lives Matter leader and provocateur, belies the accepted narrative that Trump-supporters alone caused the riots.” BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested
 

hadit

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2013
Messages
27,600
Reaction score
5,905
Points
280
Getting back to the Constitution--the pardon power is specifically a "Grant," so on behalf of some other person, not the President personally. Similarly, the charge of "Incitement" is not about asking fanatics to cross inter-state lines to assemble to hear remarks. That actually happened, in the matter of January 6. Once assembled, the the encouragement of a behavior outcome--a march to a location to fight like hell, or lose your nation forever--is the encouragement of the riot outcome.

.

Since the Trumped-Up, bogus "Demonstration," about an allegedly "Bogus Election," was clearly pre-meditated, in advance(?): Then the Personal Appearance at the assembly--exhorting the outcome expressed: Is an Incitement of the alleged, "Insurrection" level riot--details still pouring in. The capture and even assassination of elected officials was apparently a part of the pre-meditated plan, so in "Insurrection-Level" event.

Even back to the Pardon: Criminal Offenses are not a part of the job description, "President of the United States." No oath is taken on behalf of any. Nothing is created to "Assume" that the President is innocent of federal crimes, or any assumption of legal obligation to "Assume" the right of federal criminal activity.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(In America, people even pray for the federal crimes as a First Amendment protected behavior--likely priests and pastors would concur: Matt 25: 14-30!)

Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol
'The ones who were agitating the crowd were not Trump supporters'

An analysis of videos of the death of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt at the U.S. Capitol indicates Antifa activists provoked the fatal gunshot from a police officer. Japanese investigator Misako Ganaha explained in a video interview with Epoch Times reporter Joshua Philipp on his “Crossroads” program that she analyzed two lengthy videos, affording two different angles of the incident near the House chamber…. just prior to the shooting, two men who had been agitating the crowd broke the glass on a set of doors.

… the same Marxist “agitate and divide” tactics employed by leftists in her home country…. part of the tactic, she said, is for someone in collaboration with the agitators to serve as a “witness” to mainstream media, which tells the story “without analyzing.” Media simply repeats what the witness says, explained Ganaha, “so the world does not know the truth.” Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol

======================================================

“BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested

The Utah Black Lives Matter "activist" has been bragging about his involvement in instigating the Capitol riots. Now, he's been arrested.


The deadly riots at the Capitol last week that have sparked Big Tech cancelations and prompted another impeachment of President Trump were instigated in part by Black Lives Matter and Antifa “activists,” according to multiple media reports. One of the highest profile suspects, John Earle Sullivan from Utah, has been arrested.”

This story will be buried by mainstream media and suppressed by Big Tech. The arrest of John Earle Sullivan, a known Black Lives Matter leader and provocateur, belies the accepted narrative that Trump-supporters alone caused the riots.” BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested
And this kind of thing is why the panicked rush to impeach was so transparently political and based on feelz instead of truth and fact.
 

Agit8r

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2010
Messages
12,103
Reaction score
2,164
Points
245
Getting back to the Constitution--the pardon power is specifically a "Grant," so on behalf of some other person, not the President personally. Similarly, the charge of "Incitement" is not about asking fanatics to cross inter-state lines to assemble to hear remarks. That actually happened, in the matter of January 6. Once assembled, the the encouragement of a behavior outcome--a march to a location to fight like hell, or lose your nation forever--is the encouragement of the riot outcome.

.

Since the Trumped-Up, bogus "Demonstration," about an allegedly "Bogus Election," was clearly pre-meditated, in advance(?): Then the Personal Appearance at the assembly--exhorting the outcome expressed: Is an Incitement of the alleged, "Insurrection" level riot--details still pouring in. The capture and even assassination of elected officials was apparently a part of the pre-meditated plan, so in "Insurrection-Level" event.

Even back to the Pardon: Criminal Offenses are not a part of the job description, "President of the United States." No oath is taken on behalf of any. Nothing is created to "Assume" that the President is innocent of federal crimes, or any assumption of legal obligation to "Assume" the right of federal criminal activity.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(In America, people even pray for the federal crimes as a First Amendment protected behavior--likely priests and pastors would concur: Matt 25: 14-30!)
The tricky part will be showing coordination between trump (his attorney, etc) and Trump Army. Though Giuliani's calls to members of congress (one voicemail of which has been trurned over), and the reconnaissance tours given by his allies in congress the day prior, suggests that there was coordination between all three parts.

Trump being presently under impeachment means he cannot pardon anyone while it is ongoing.
 

Agit8r

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2010
Messages
12,103
Reaction score
2,164
Points
245
Getting back to the Constitution--the pardon power is specifically a "Grant," so on behalf of some other person, not the President personally. Similarly, the charge of "Incitement" is not about asking fanatics to cross inter-state lines to assemble to hear remarks. That actually happened, in the matter of January 6. Once assembled, the the encouragement of a behavior outcome--a march to a location to fight like hell, or lose your nation forever--is the encouragement of the riot outcome.

.

Since the Trumped-Up, bogus "Demonstration," about an allegedly "Bogus Election," was clearly pre-meditated, in advance(?): Then the Personal Appearance at the assembly--exhorting the outcome expressed: Is an Incitement of the alleged, "Insurrection" level riot--details still pouring in. The capture and even assassination of elected officials was apparently a part of the pre-meditated plan, so in "Insurrection-Level" event.

Even back to the Pardon: Criminal Offenses are not a part of the job description, "President of the United States." No oath is taken on behalf of any. Nothing is created to "Assume" that the President is innocent of federal crimes, or any assumption of legal obligation to "Assume" the right of federal criminal activity.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(In America, people even pray for the federal crimes as a First Amendment protected behavior--likely priests and pastors would concur: Matt 25: 14-30!)

Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol
'The ones who were agitating the crowd were not Trump supporters'

An analysis of videos of the death of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt at the U.S. Capitol indicates Antifa activists provoked the fatal gunshot from a police officer. Japanese investigator Misako Ganaha explained in a video interview with Epoch Times reporter Joshua Philipp on his “Crossroads” program that she analyzed two lengthy videos, affording two different angles of the incident near the House chamber…. just prior to the shooting, two men who had been agitating the crowd broke the glass on a set of doors.

… the same Marxist “agitate and divide” tactics employed by leftists in her home country…. part of the tactic, she said, is for someone in collaboration with the agitators to serve as a “witness” to mainstream media, which tells the story “without analyzing.” Media simply repeats what the witness says, explained Ganaha, “so the world does not know the truth.” Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol

======================================================

“BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested

The Utah Black Lives Matter "activist" has been bragging about his involvement in instigating the Capitol riots. Now, he's been arrested.


The deadly riots at the Capitol last week that have sparked Big Tech cancelations and prompted another impeachment of President Trump were instigated in part by Black Lives Matter and Antifa “activists,” according to multiple media reports. One of the highest profile suspects, John Earle Sullivan from Utah, has been arrested.”

This story will be buried by mainstream media and suppressed by Big Tech. The arrest of John Earle Sullivan, a known Black Lives Matter leader and provocateur, belies the accepted narrative that Trump-supporters alone caused the riots.” BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested
AHHHH! now it makes sense. You all get your news from Qanon. Unreal :icon_rolleyes:
 

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
104,652
Reaction score
39,316
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Getting back to the Constitution--the pardon power is specifically a "Grant," so on behalf of some other person, not the President personally. Similarly, the charge of "Incitement" is not about asking fanatics to cross inter-state lines to assemble to hear remarks. That actually happened, in the matter of January 6. Once assembled, the the encouragement of a behavior outcome--a march to a location to fight like hell, or lose your nation forever--is the encouragement of the riot outcome.

.

Since the Trumped-Up, bogus "Demonstration," about an allegedly "Bogus Election," was clearly pre-meditated, in advance(?): Then the Personal Appearance at the assembly--exhorting the outcome expressed: Is an Incitement of the alleged, "Insurrection" level riot--details still pouring in. The capture and even assassination of elected officials was apparently a part of the pre-meditated plan, so in "Insurrection-Level" event.

Even back to the Pardon: Criminal Offenses are not a part of the job description, "President of the United States." No oath is taken on behalf of any. Nothing is created to "Assume" that the President is innocent of federal crimes, or any assumption of legal obligation to "Assume" the right of federal criminal activity.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(In America, people even pray for the federal crimes as a First Amendment protected behavior--likely priests and pastors would concur: Matt 25: 14-30!)

Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol
'The ones who were agitating the crowd were not Trump supporters'

An analysis of videos of the death of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt at the U.S. Capitol indicates Antifa activists provoked the fatal gunshot from a police officer. Japanese investigator Misako Ganaha explained in a video interview with Epoch Times reporter Joshua Philipp on his “Crossroads” program that she analyzed two lengthy videos, affording two different angles of the incident near the House chamber…. just prior to the shooting, two men who had been agitating the crowd broke the glass on a set of doors.

… the same Marxist “agitate and divide” tactics employed by leftists in her home country…. part of the tactic, she said, is for someone in collaboration with the agitators to serve as a “witness” to mainstream media, which tells the story “without analyzing.” Media simply repeats what the witness says, explained Ganaha, “so the world does not know the truth.” Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol

======================================================

“BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested

The Utah Black Lives Matter "activist" has been bragging about his involvement in instigating the Capitol riots. Now, he's been arrested.


The deadly riots at the Capitol last week that have sparked Big Tech cancelations and prompted another impeachment of President Trump were instigated in part by Black Lives Matter and Antifa “activists,” according to multiple media reports. One of the highest profile suspects, John Earle Sullivan from Utah, has been arrested.”

This story will be buried by mainstream media and suppressed by Big Tech. The arrest of John Earle Sullivan, a known Black Lives Matter leader and provocateur, belies the accepted narrative that Trump-supporters alone caused the riots.” BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested
AHHHH! now it makes sense. You all get your news from Qanon. Unreal :icon_rolleyes:


So you are denying the arrest of your ally?????


I'll add your post to the other Liberals in the 'is not, isssssss noooootttttt!!!" pile.

Seems to be the knee-jerk response from jerks.
 

meaner gene

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
4,051
Points
930
So you are denying the arrest of your ally?????


I'll add your post to the other Liberals in the 'is not, isssssss noooootttttt!!!" pile.

Seems to be the knee-jerk response from jerks.
The problem with your theory is that he was there as a witness, and was videoing the event.


John Earle Sullivan, Who Recorded Ashli Babbitt's Shooting ...
lawandcrime.com › u-s-capitol-siege › man-who-shot-v...


The man who recorded the shooting of Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt, 35, is in legal trouble himself. John Earle Sullivan, 26, of Utah, is now ..

You can't video and incite at the same time.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,241
Reaction score
11,774
Points
950
So you are denying the arrest of your ally?????


I'll add your post to the other Liberals in the 'is not, isssssss noooootttttt!!!" pile.

Seems to be the knee-jerk response from jerks.
The problem with your theory is that he was there as a witness, and was videoing the event.


John Earle Sullivan, Who Recorded Ashli Babbitt's Shooting ...
lawandcrime.com › u-s-capitol-siege › man-who-shot-v...


The man who recorded the shooting of Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt, 35, is in legal trouble himself. John Earle Sullivan, 26, of Utah, is now ..

You can't video and incite at the same time.
witness's dont encourage and push for more violence,,


 

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
104,652
Reaction score
39,316
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
So you are denying the arrest of your ally?????


I'll add your post to the other Liberals in the 'is not, isssssss noooootttttt!!!" pile.

Seems to be the knee-jerk response from jerks.
The problem with your theory is that he was there as a witness, and was videoing the event.


John Earle Sullivan, Who Recorded Ashli Babbitt's Shooting ...
lawandcrime.com › u-s-capitol-siege › man-who-shot-v...


The man who recorded the shooting of Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt, 35, is in legal trouble himself. John Earle Sullivan, 26, of Utah, is now ..

You can't video and incite at the same time.


You're the scum that altered my post to claim it said exactly the opposite of what I wrote.



Beat it.
 

meaner gene

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
4,051
Points
930
witness's dont encourage and push for more violence,,


I was just countering the false narrative that he was responsible for the woman getting shot.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,241
Reaction score
11,774
Points
950
witness's dont encourage and push for more violence,,


I was just countering the false narrative that he was responsible for the woman getting shot.
he did escalate the situation that led to her getting shot,,

 

meaner gene

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
4,051
Points
930
You're the scum that altered my post to claim it said exactly the opposite of what I wrote.
If there was even a thread of truth to that, you or someone else would have reported it, and let the MODS decide.

So you either didn't say anything, or the MODS laughed you out of court like they did Rudy Giuliani.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top