Inadequate federal regulation, not Romney’s Bain Capital was at fault.

[DSGE]

You just keep on making unfounded assertions.

of course if true you would not be so afraid to indentify the most significant unfounded assertion. What does you fear tell you?

Gee, maybe try any of the assertions in the post I was responding to? Why so afraid to use your common sense? What does your fear tell you?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Gee, maybe try any of the assertions in the post I was responding to?

well pick the most obvious unfounded assertion and we can begin your lesson. The most obvious one will be the hardest one for you to swallow but the best from which to learn.

 

[likeabird03]

something as absurd as private equity and leveraged buy-outs actually profitable. That's the problem.

Of course there is nothing absurd about buying things or stocks as private equity investors do.

Would the liberal make buying things illegal???????

liberalism has nothing to do with it. In a real free-market economy leveraged buyouts would not be profitable. It's actually govt intervention that has helped fueled the rise.

 

[editec]

Inadequate federal regulation, not Romney’s Bain Capital was at fault.

In many cases it isn't merely a lack of regulations, it is truly BAD regulations.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

liberalism has nothing to do with it. In a real free-market economy leveraged buyouts would not be profitable. It's actually govt intervention that has helped fueled the rise.

OMG that is so child llike

1) of course liberal government intervention is everywhere and of course it makes things happen differently for better or worse, mostly worse. Soviet intervention was massive and we know what happened.

2) any item or business or huge corporation may be judged to sell today for far less than it will sell for tomorrow; thus buying it today, with or without leverage, will be a good idea.