In secretly recorded video, top DOJ official says DOJ plans to redact all Republicans and conservatives in Epstein file release

JimH52

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
52,094
Reaction score
31,063
Points
2,645
Location
US
The Justice Department on Thursday scrambled to address alleged revelations about the Epstein files published by James O’Keefe—founder of the far-right Project Veritas, known for its hidden-camera stings, in which individuals are secretly filmed disclosing information about the organizations that employ them.

In the secret recording, Schnitt acknowledges that the Epstein files do exist—“thousands and thousands of pages of files”—and goes on to detail the DOJ’s plan.

“They’ll redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files,” the official said over lunch. He also noted that Maxwell was “transferred to a minimum-security prison too recently, which is against [Federal Bureau of Prisons] policy because she’s a convicted sex offender,” adding, “They’re offering her something to keep her mouth shut.”

O’Keefe’s supposed bombshells here, as always, warrant skepticism, as they are notoriously sensationalized and often deceptively edited.

This sounds like something the trump crowd would do. No one should be redacted in the files, repub or conservative or dem or liberal. No one can believe anything coming out of the trump people. I will wait for the list that the victims are compiling. That will have names that we can believe.

Funny that in the DOJ's statement that authenticated the video. Ooooops
 
The Justice Department on Thursday scrambled to address alleged revelations about the Epstein files published by James O’Keefe—founder of the far-right Project Veritas, known for its hidden-camera stings, in which individuals are secretly filmed disclosing information about the organizations that employ them.

In the secret recording, Schnitt acknowledges that the Epstein files do exist—“thousands and thousands of pages of files”—and goes on to detail the DOJ’s plan.

“They’ll redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files,” the official said over lunch. He also noted that Maxwell was “transferred to a minimum-security prison too recently, which is against [Federal Bureau of Prisons] policy because she’s a convicted sex offender,” adding, “They’re offering her something to keep her mouth shut.”


O’Keefe’s supposed bombshells here, as always, warrant skepticism, as they are notoriously sensationalized and often deceptively edited.

This sounds like something the trump crowd would do. No one should be redacted in the files, repub or conservative or dem or liberal. No one can believe anything coming out of the trump people. I will wait for the list that the victims are compiling. That will have names that we can believe.

Funny that in the DOJ's statement that authenticated the video. Ooooops
opinion piece

belongs in conspiracy
 
James O’Keefe? Seriously?
 
James O’Keefe? Seriously?
Read it....the DOJ does not deny the video. The files do not need to be released, because they will be distorted by trump's legal counsel, the DOJ. The victims need to release a client list.
 
Suddenly the left are fans of James O'Keefe. :laugh:
The facts are facts. trump has turned the DOJ and the FBI into his law firms and he is instructing to investigate his enemies and to politicize their information to protect repubs and conservatives.
 
Suddenly the left are fans of James O'Keefe. :laugh:
I'm not.

Will you renounce all your previous support of him today?

Just type out that he's a far rightwing bullshitter and has always been one and no one should have ever taken him seriously.
 
The last sentence is an incomplete one
The Justice Department on Thursday scrambled to address alleged revelations about the Epstein files published by James O’Keefe—founder of the far-right Project Veritas, known for its hidden-camera stings, in which individuals are secretly filmed disclosing information about the organizations that employ them.

In the secret recording, Schnitt acknowledges that the Epstein files do exist—“thousands and thousands of pages of files”—and goes on to detail the DOJ’s plan.

“They’ll redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files,” the official said over lunch. He also noted that Maxwell was “transferred to a minimum-security prison too recently, which is against [Federal Bureau of Prisons] policy because she’s a convicted sex offender,” adding, “They’re offering her something to keep her mouth shut.”


O’Keefe’s supposed bombshells here, as always, warrant skepticism, as they are notoriously sensationalized and often deceptively edited.

This sounds like something the trump crowd would do. No one should be redacted in the files, repub or conservative or dem or liberal. No one can believe anything coming out of the trump people. I will wait for the list that the victims are compiling. That will have names that we can believe.

Funny that in the DOJ's statement that authenticated the video. Ooooops
The last sentence is an incomplete one
 
Notice how OPer "neglected" to tell us the kind of information James O'Keefe is known for, namely: He videotaped pro-abortion people talking about buying and selling aborted baby's body parts! (One of the pro abortion people mentioned how she wanted a Ferrari [so let's sell more baby body parts]).

Dr. Mengele would be so proud...

Well, you can't blame Op for leaving out that information. It tends to...

but wait, doesn't he want Republicans to check out a guy who is apparently doing something that other dims want to do also: question the Trump admin?

Wow... I thought I'd seen everything from the dims.. Even when information helps them make their point ("point"), they ignore it if it makes Rs look good.
 
I'm confused. first OP mentions O'Keefe, then he quotes this Schnitt guy without telling us WHO Schnitt is...

Maybe I should check out more reputable sources.. sounds good
 
Read it....the DOJ does not deny the video. The files do not need to be released, because they will be distorted by trump's legal counsel, the DOJ. The victims need to release a client list.
Show us the video.
 
I have often compared the MAGA movement to the Jacobins of the French Revolution.

We are now at the schism stage where the revolutionaries have begun to get more and more bloodthirsty and are turning on one another.

The crowd is fed spectacle after spectacle to distract them from their dreams of democracy being crushed by a power-hungry madman, and they roar for more heads to be guillotined. The pile of "RINOs" grows ever larger.

In the end, Robespierre himself was led to the guillotine and the Reign of Terror wound down, only to be replaced by Emperor Napoleon.

.
 
Thanks.

"Acting Deputy Chief."

I'm sure Kash confides in him frequently.
He actually says Bongino and Patel want the files released unredacted.

Most of Trump's appointees were "acting" during his first term because he knew they would not pass proper vetting.

It's the same now.

.
 
He actually says Bongino and Patel want the files released unredacted.

Most of Trump's appointees were "acting" during his first term because he knew they would not pass proper vetting.

It's the same now.

.
It's just such a hokey video. O'Keefe was rightly panned by the left for sending women to chat up men and get them to say stuff. Men say anything if they think it will impress some babe that suddenly starts talking to them.

BTW, when they "say anything" there is no requirement that it be true, or anything other than what they think the woman wants to hear.

But, I suppose we will know when "Epstein Files" are suddenly released with only names of Democrats. Till then, I'll be a skeptic.
 
15th post
It's just such a hokey video. O'Keefe was rightly panned by the left for sending women to chat up men and get them to say stuff. Men say anything if they think it will impress some babe that suddenly starts talking to them.

BTW, when they "say anything" there is no requirement that it be true, or anything other than what they think the woman wants to hear.

But, I suppose we will know when "Epstein Files" are suddenly released with only names of Democrats. Till then, I'll be a skeptic.
There are no Epstein Files. Bondi was out over her skis. She is a DEI hire by Trump to make himself and the rest of the Cabinet look smarter than they are.

Bondi lied to make herself look important. Trump would fire her, but that would just add more fuel to the coverup fire.

He'll figure out a way to shitcan her when the time is right.

.
 
There are no Epstein Files.
So, what was that guy talking about redacting? How could there be "no Epstein Files?" Epstein was investigated in multiple jurisdictions, so of course there are files.

Do you mean that there is no "Epstein's List?" That makes more sense. Suppose there were dozens or hundreds of men that Epsteing trafficked underage girls to. How would those dimwitted teeny boppers know who the head of the RNC or the DNC PAC were? Not saying either of them was guilty of anything, just an example. They aren't going to recognize some old dude they give a massage plus to as he's laying under a towel grabbing their butts.

They might have understood who Prince Andrew was, which may be why he was drummed out of the Royals.
Bondi was out over her skis. She is a DEI hire by Trump to make himself and the rest of the Cabinet look smarter than they are.

Bondi lied to make herself look important. Trump would fire her, but that would just add more fuel to the coverup fire.

He'll figure out a way to shitcan her when the time is right.

.
She was over her skis, I agree. But by promising to release the files, before Trump knew what was in them, who was in them, or whatever reason he has to change his mind about releasing them.
 
Last edited:
1000005539.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom