In blow to Trump’s immigration agenda, federal judge blocks asylum ban for migrants who enter illega

[Claudette]

Exaclty....BINGO !!Because your type has no clue (or concern) about the long term consequences. And that is YOUR downfall as well, even if you can't comprehend.There ARE consequences. Especially if you are a woman. Your Globalist masters have painted a picture of Utopia where everyone joins hands and sings Kumbaya.....but that's not human nature unfortunately. If you have children, and they have children etc...they will all pay a steep price for your foolishness.

`
OK, that's nice but has absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic which is the judges ruling. Do you know how this is going to change things at the border? If you object to the ruling, by what legal grounds? How does this ruling change things overall? How will trump respond to this?
`
`

I imagine he will appeal this decision. I find it hard to believe that someone coming into our country illegally can ask for anything.

lol

And what will be ‘grounds’ for Trump’s appeal – I don’t want to follow the law because I’m an ignorant, frightened bigot.

There you go with the race bullshit again.

Not wanting illegals in the country isn't bigotry you idiot.

Oh and I'd say Trump is a hell of a lot smarter than you will ever be and the only one speaking about race is YOU.

You really are a fool.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

None of the invaders are entitled to asylum. Take the claim. They can wait in Tijuana until the claim is rejected.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

`

"A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from denying asylum to migrants who illegally cross the southern border into the United States, saying the policy likely violated federal law on asylum eligibility.

In a ruling late Monday, Jon S. Tigar of the U.S. District Court in San Francisco issued a temporary nationwide restraining order barring enforcement of the policy. President Trump’s action was announced on Nov. 9, though the White House had as early as last month floated drastic changes to the way the United States affords sanctuary to people fleeing persecution in their home countries.

The judge’s order remains in effect until Dec. 19, at which point the court will consider arguments for a permanent order. The administration offered no immediate comment overnight but has routinely appealed adverse decisions". - Source​

`
Now what? With the caravan looming closer, it appears they will actually have to process these migrants for asylum despite what trump says. This is going to change the dynamics here greatly.

Good.

And in his decision, he wrote that the government’s argument that the manner of entry can be the lone factor rendering a migrant ineligible for asylum “strains credulity."

“To say that one may apply for something that one has no right to receive is to render the right to apply a dead letter,” he argued. “There simply is no reasonable way to harmonize the two.”

The judge pointedly denied the claim that the president, by fiat, could give the manner of entry added legal weight as a determinant of asylum. He reasoned that the “interpretive guide” of United Nations compacts on asylum lent extra force to congressional requirements. The intent of Congress, Tigar wrote, was “unambiguous.”

“And if what Defendants intend to say is that the President by proclamation can override Congress’s clearly expressed legislative intent, simply because a statute conflicts with the President’s policy goals, the Court rejects that argument also,” the judge found.

Lee Gelernt, the ACLU attorney who argued the case, welcomed the ruling in a news release.

“This ban is illegal, will put people’s lives in danger, and raises the alarm about President Trump’s disregard for separation of powers,” he said. “There is no justifiable reason to flatly deny people the right to apply for asylum, and we cannot send them back to danger based on the manner of their entry. Congress has been clear on this point for decades.”​

Even better. The out-of-control, petulant would-be autocrat reined in, and made to respect Congressional power and the rule of law, again.

Yes, of course, a few thousand people will have to be housed, fed, and "processed", the screeching and howling of xenophobes and nativists notwithstanding.

Oh go **** yourself.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

These invaders were offered asylum in Mexico.
The rules for asylum are the first border you cross where you are safe and asylum is offered is where you should stay.
The vast majority of these people are looking for taxpayer funded handouts.

The third-world has fucked over Europe, and now thanks to the American left, they'll be doing the same here.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

`

"A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from denying asylum to migrants who illegally cross the southern border into the United States, saying the policy likely violated federal law on asylum eligibility.

In a ruling late Monday, Jon S. Tigar of the U.S. District Court in San Francisco issued a temporary nationwide restraining order barring enforcement of the policy. President Trump’s action was announced on Nov. 9, though the White House had as early as last month floated drastic changes to the way the United States affords sanctuary to people fleeing persecution in their home countries.

The judge’s order remains in effect until Dec. 19, at which point the court will consider arguments for a permanent order. The administration offered no immediate comment overnight but has routinely appealed adverse decisions". - Source​

`
Now what? With the caravan looming closer, it appears they will actually have to process these migrants for asylum despite what trump says. This is going to change the dynamics here greatly.

******* bullshit.

We have to allow asylum to those crossing illegally into the country? What is the difference between this and complete open borders?

Not much, and it's what today's Dims want.
When they look to the south, they see an unending supply of future Dimocrat voters with their palms out to the government.

 

[mudwhistle]

`

"A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from denying asylum to migrants who illegally cross the southern border into the United States, saying the policy likely violated federal law on asylum eligibility.

In a ruling late Monday, Jon S. Tigar of the U.S. District Court in San Francisco issued a temporary nationwide restraining order barring enforcement of the policy. President Trump’s action was announced on Nov. 9, though the White House had as early as last month floated drastic changes to the way the United States affords sanctuary to people fleeing persecution in their home countries.

The judge’s order remains in effect until Dec. 19, at which point the court will consider arguments for a permanent order. The administration offered no immediate comment overnight but has routinely appealed adverse decisions". - Source​

`
Now what? With the caravan looming closer, it appears they will actually have to process these migrants for asylum despite what trump says. This is going to change the dynamics here greatly.

Obama appointed Judge says Trump isn't allowed to enforce the law.
Judge will get his ass overturned.
It all part of the resistance.
I think Trump should do like Clinton and fire 94 federal judges.