'IMMEDIATE recusal': Techno Fog BUSTS Judge Chutkan with her OWN WORDS on Trump in bombshell of a thread

[Doc7505]

Because juries, not judges decide if a person is guilty.

This is not like the court of appeals, or supreme court where the judges/justices decide a case.

If she carries out any actions that show bias against Trump, that would be grounds to have the case thrown out.

~~~~~~

28 U.S. Code § 144 - Bias or prejudice of judge

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Actually they are.

Recusal of Judge | NC PRO

ncpro.sog.unc.edu

Examples – Recusal Not Warranted

No disqualification just because judge is aware of the facts, or had prior involvement in the case, including ruling against a party. See State v. Moffitt, 185 N.C. App. 308 (2007)

Judge’s personal view that a certain type of crime is very serious is not disqualifying. See State v. Kennedy, 110 N.C. App. 302 (1993)

No they aren't because in America you're supposed to be presumed innocent until the evidence proves you guilty

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's not even that they will contaminate a jury, but that they feel the comments do not allow her to make impartial rulings. Which based on what she said, is a ridiculous notion that a judge can't set personal feelings aside.

Innocent until proven guilty. A judge cannot presume someone is guilty until the evidence has been submitted to the courts

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What were her words exactly that you're alleging contaminate a jury? Quote them.

That trump was guilty

 

[evenflow1969]

Lol

Nope..
Get your triple masks ready. Your probably wearing them now.

Lol, no masks. What kinda knee pads ya use? I have some paper towels you can use to wipe your face after!

 

[HeyNorm]

It's easy for stupid ass white men to claim how great it is for black folks to be here. If you were one of the black folks who came here as a slave and faced the atrocities that they faced you would never say that stupid shit again.

They faced worse in Africa. You should be counting yourself as one of the lucky ones. Some of your cousins in Africa would trade places with you in a heartbeat.

 

[Arlette]

So you DONT think its problematic for a judge to be making those kinds of statements?

It's not a problem. What this request tells you is that Trump is in charge of legal strategy instead of his lawyer. That's the problem. For Trump

 

[Curried Goats]

That trump was guilty

You don't even know what she actually said do you?

 

[westwall]

No it's because of racist trash like you.

Squeals the racist trash...

 

[Doc7505]

That trump was guilty

~~~~~~

​

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You don't even know what she actually said do you?

Actually she has suggested that trump should be prosecuted and imprisoned.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's not a problem. What this request tells you is that Trump is in charge of legal strategy instead of his lawyer. That's the problem. For Trump

It would be problematic to you if it was Joe Biden

 

[Arlette]

It would be problematic to you if it was Joe Biden

No. It's because she doesn't render a verdict. The jury does

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I would submit to you the “stupid ass” people are those who vote 95% for one party year after year.
Wouldn’t you agree?

Why would black folks vote Republican?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

They faced worse in Africa. You should be counting yourself as one of the lucky ones. Some of your cousins in Africa would trade places with you in a heartbeat.

Have you ever been to any country in Africa?

 

[Curried Goats]

Actually she has suggested that trump should be prosecuted and imprisoned.

What were her actual words as opposed to your biased impression of them?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What were her actual words as opposed to your biased impression of them?

Those were her actual words. Or more correctly suggestions

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No. It's because she doesn't render a verdict. The jury does

Sigh shaking my head.

Conviction Reversed Over Judge's Remark That Black Man ‘Looks Like a Criminal’​

An appeals court called a federal judge’s comment “wholly incompatible with the fair administration of justice” and ordered a new trial.
The judge, Stephen J. Murphy III

Conviction Reversed Over Judge’s Remark That Black Man ‘Looks Like a Criminal’ (Published 2023)

An appeals court called a federal judge’s comment “wholly incompatible with the fair administration of justice” and ordered a new trial.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Arlette]

Sigh shaking my head.

Conviction Reversed Over Judge's Remark That Black Man ‘Looks Like a Criminal’​

An appeals court called a federal judge’s comment “wholly incompatible with the fair administration of justice” and ordered a new trial.
The judge, Stephen J. Murphy III

Conviction Reversed Over Judge’s Remark That Black Man ‘Looks Like a Criminal’ (Published 2023)

An appeals court called a federal judge’s comment “wholly incompatible with the fair administration of justice” and ordered a new trial.

www.nytimes.com

Paywall

Next

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Paywall

Next

I cut and pasted the key points and the judges name. Your complaint is irrelevant