Imagine this scenario, Trump acolytes......

[nat4900]

Libtard, here is the exact quote, and Mitt turned out to be 100% correct: “When you were asked, what's the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said 'Russia.' Not Al-Qaeda; you said Russia,"Obama charged.

And if your other half brain were functioning, you too would say that Obama was 100% CORRECT.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Libtard, here is the exact quote, and Mitt turned out to be 100% correct: “When you were asked, what's the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said 'Russia.' Not Al-Qaeda; you said Russia,"Obama charged.

And if your other half brain were functioning, you too would say that Obama was 100% CORRECT.

/——/ No you nitwit, turns out Russia is our biggest threat. Al Quida is all but wiped out.

 

[Cellblock2429]

They are caught in process crimes and don’t pretend you don’t know the purpose of them.

I then repeat......A person charged with a process crime is a liar, unethical, corrupt and a scum bag....PRECISELY the "qualifications" of most people Trump surrounds himself with...LOL

/——/ Not necessarily true. You give testimony months apart and mis state a minor point and wham-o. You are caught in a purjury trap. But you know that already and applaud Muller for twisting arms and bankrupting innocent people to get them to flip on Trump or even make stuff up.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

Was trump trying to rig the RNC nomination against perry , newt and all the rest?

Like Hillary did with the DNC against bernie?

 

[nat4900]

Al Quida is all but wiped out.

Are you going to thank Obama???..........LOL

 

[nat4900]

Not necessarily true. You give testimony months apart and mis state a minor point and wham-o. You are caught in a purjury trap. But you know that already and applaud Muller for twisting arms and bankrupting innocent people to get them to flip on Trump or even make stuff up.

Never, ever dawned on a Trump ass kisser like you that Trump surrounded himself with fucking corrupt morons??? (who are not much more different than him, btw.)....LOL

 

[Cellblock2429]

Not necessarily true. You give testimony months apart and mis state a minor point and wham-o. You are caught in a purjury trap. But you know that already and applaud Muller for twisting arms and bankrupting innocent people to get them to flip on Trump or even make stuff up.

Never, ever dawned on a Trump ass kisser like you that Trump surrounded himself with fucking corrupt morons??? (who are not much more different than him, btw.)....LOL

/——-/ And you Hildabeast azz kissers think she and her rapist husband are as clean as the wind driven snow.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Al Quida is all but wiped out.

Are you going to thank Obama???..........LOL

/——-/ I’ll thank Obozo for not being president anymore.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

/---/ The FBI would TELL Hildabeast why they were doing it. It is her campaign. Did the FBI tell Trump what they were doing?

 

[Norman]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

I don't need to imagine, you need to imagine since you have no proof of anything you spout.

Live in your delusions by all means... I am not going to get in the way as you self identify yourself as a fool.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

Was trump trying to rig the RNC nomination against perry , newt and all the rest?

Like Hillary did with the DNC against bernie?

/----/ Seriously? Perry announced on September 11, 2015, that he had suspended his campaign. Trump didn't need to do anything about Perry except wait him out.

 

[CowboyTed]

Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.

Thank you for faithfully doing the ONLY valuable contribution you can make on this forum, Celly......and THAT is, bumping a thread......lol

/----/ Is Nat still beating his wife? Let me state that I have no proof that NAt is even married, and if so has ever or still is beating his wife. But the seriousness of the charges of assault and battery are so compelling we need to launch a full scale investigation. Let the discussion begin.

It is noted that a reasonable questions was asked and the answer was only personal insults... Nat has evidence to back up that Russians did interfere in the US elections and the FBI did there duty to defend the country.

1. YOU didn't get any feeling of anything; you've been immersed in a world of pundits like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, etc... who translate Mueller' silence to an audience who is eager to find nothing wrong with Trump despite mountain of evidence to the contrary.
2. It takes literally "a completely empty brain" to even fathom the idea no harm would come to Trump because "he did nothing wrong". Even his own son goes out of his way to cover up for him.
3. If there were leaks from Mueller's investigation, the same individuals who claim there is nothing today would have claimed mishandling of the investigation.

What happened to the country - the interference of a foreign entity in our internal affairs - should have been the ONE thing that unites all political Partys. And if the president of the United is involved, everyone should see to it that he pays the ultimate price for destroying our way of life.

Instead, Republicans are very willing to give Russia a pass and condone Trump's actions. I have asked anyone who wants this investigation to go away the simple question: would you not have wanted the investigation to be completed if the president in question was a Democrat?

A patriot cannot be a fanatic because the first duty of a patriot is to defend and protect the country against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

As it stands today, it is unanimous that Russia meddled in our elections; a president that's not involved would want the Justice Department to get to the bottom of this affront. If you find yourself siding with Trump in his attack on our institutions, consider yourself part of the problem.

You may have a hard time accepting the obvious but deep down you know that Trump has done something wrong; after all, why would he want to derail the investigation if he's certain there is nothing to find?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Not necessarily true. You give testimony months apart and mis state a minor point and wham-o. You are caught in a purjury trap. But you know that already and applaud Muller for twisting arms and bankrupting innocent people to get them to flip on Trump or even make stuff up.

Never, ever dawned on a Trump ass kisser like you that Trump surrounded himself with fucking corrupt morons??? (who are not much more different than him, btw.)....LOL

So obozo didn't with Kerry going against him and his red line in syria?

 

[MrShangles]

Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.

Thank you for faithfully doing the ONLY valuable contribution you can make on this forum, Celly......and THAT is, bumping a thread......lol

/----/ Is Nat still beating his wife? Let me state that I have no proof that NAt is even married, and if so has ever or still is beating his wife. But the seriousness of the charges of assault and battery are so compelling we need to launch a full scale investigation. Let the discussion begin.

First of all we have to get the needed information for a complete correct address.
Are you a liberal? If so then no evidence is necessary, so carry on the accusations until Nat is completely destroyed,
Are you a conservative? Then you must look for evidence to support your claims, and if you find evidence then you must give Nat his time in a court in front of a jury of his peers to defend himself.
That’s the most important questions


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Pop23]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

You assume there is but one way of doing this, violating the law. In that case it would be prohibited no matter who the candidate was.

You claiming, with all the resources give our intelligence community, that this would be the only way to ascertain the validity of a charge by a foreign entity?

The first question would be, IS THIS ENTITY TRYING TO SCREW WITH THE ELECTION.

 

[Oldstyle]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

Now imagine that the Trump campaign paid someone to go to the FBI with made up allegations about Hillary Clinton...got a FISA court to issue warrants to spy on people associated with the Clinton campaign and then went to their favorite news outlets and "leaked" that Clinton was being investigated by the FBI for "collusion"?

Oh, wait...that wasn't Trump...that was the Clinton campaign doing all of those things...my bad!

 

[nat4900]

And you Hildabeast azz kissers think she and her rapist husband are as clean as the wind driven snow.

A "conclusion" worthy of what comes out of an idiot's butt......

 

[nat4900]

I don't need to imagine, you need to imagine since you have no proof of anything you spout.

Live in your delusions by all means... I am not going to get in the way as you self identify yourself as a fool.

You could have just skipped this thread....instead you chose to confirm your Trump Cult Membership card.

 

[nat4900]

You may have a hard time accepting the obvious but deep down you know that Trump has done something wrong; after all, why would he want to derail the investigation if he's certain there is nothing to find?

PRECISELY !!!

If Trump had "nothing to worry about" he would have just gone on to another golfing outing......Instead.............lol

 

[Cellblock2429]

Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.

Thank you for faithfully doing the ONLY valuable contribution you can make on this forum, Celly......and THAT is, bumping a thread......lol

/----/ Is Nat still beating his wife? Let me state that I have no proof that NAt is even married, and if so has ever or still is beating his wife. But the seriousness of the charges of assault and battery are so compelling we need to launch a full scale investigation. Let the discussion begin.

It is noted that a reasonable questions was asked and the answer was only personal insults... Nat has evidence to back up that Russians did interfere in the US elections and the FBI did there duty to defend the country.

1. YOU didn't get any feeling of anything; you've been immersed in a world of pundits like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, etc... who translate Mueller' silence to an audience who is eager to find nothing wrong with Trump despite mountain of evidence to the contrary.
2. It takes literally "a completely empty brain" to even fathom the idea no harm would come to Trump because "he did nothing wrong". Even his own son goes out of his way to cover up for him.
3. If there were leaks from Mueller's investigation, the same individuals who claim there is nothing today would have claimed mishandling of the investigation.

What happened to the country - the interference of a foreign entity in our internal affairs - should have been the ONE thing that unites all political Partys. And if the president of the United is involved, everyone should see to it that he pays the ultimate price for destroying our way of life.

Instead, Republicans are very willing to give Russia a pass and condone Trump's actions. I have asked anyone who wants this investigation to go away the simple question: would you not have wanted the investigation to be completed if the president in question was a Democrat?

A patriot cannot be a fanatic because the first duty of a patriot is to defend and protect the country against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

As it stands today, it is unanimous that Russia meddled in our elections; a president that's not involved would want the Justice Department to get to the bottom of this affront. If you find yourself siding with Trump in his attack on our institutions, consider yourself part of the problem.

You may have a hard time accepting the obvious but deep down you know that Trump has done something wrong; after all, why would he want to derail the investigation if he's certain there is nothing to find?

/-----/ "You may have a hard time accepting the obvious but deep down you know that Trump has done something wrong; after all, why would he want to derail the investigation if he's certain there is nothing to find?" No I don't think Trump did anything wrong. If he wanted to derail the investigation he could just declassify the documents that was used for the FISA warrant and fire Muller. But he's letting Muller flail in the wind with his nothing burger.
Poll: Majority says Russia probe is politically motivated | TheHill
thehill.com/.../386685-poll-majority-thinks-russia-probe-motivated-by-politics
May 8, 2018 - The poll, which comes nearly a year after Mueller's investigation began, found that 53 percent of people think there are political motives to the ...