B. Kidd
Diamond Member
But the good news is that the Fed's are administering due justice in Terra Haute, Indiana.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm also an actual conservative (no one seems to know what that is any more) with a libertarian bent
No one exemplifies the saying: "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" better than "concerned moms" and their moralistic meddling. Nothing "adult" is safe from these well meaning busy bodies who think we should all live like 13 year-olds.Church ladies are some of the cruelest monsters God put on this earth. I expect some beautifully worded opinions from her explaining why Americans do not have the right to mind their own business and find Heaven or Hell on their own terms.
You must have gone to the wrong Church. Why would she do that? There is 0 evidence for what you portray.
Are Trump and the Republicans craven two-faced asswipes by not waiting until after the election before filling RBG's chair?
Yep. Undeniably so. You have to wonder how they can stand their own stench in light of their feigned righteousness vis-à-vis Merrick Garland in 2016.
Is Donald Trump just an empty-headed yes man for the Federalist Society when it comes to filling seats on the Supreme Court?
Yep.
With that said...
None of us ever heard of Amy Coney Barrett until a few days ago. But according to all accounts, she's pro-life, right wing, blah blah blah.
I'm pro-life, so that's good. I'm also an actual conservative (no one seems to know what that is any more) with a libertarian bent.
The Left has had a liberal Supreme Court for, what, the past three thousand years or so.
It's the Right's turn for a while, folks. Get over it.
There is no hypocrisy. If democrats had the opportunity they would have replaced Scalia with someone far more left than Merrick Garland. Republicans simply have an opportunity that democrats didn’t.
None of you ever heard of Amy Barrett? Who is 'us'? Uninformed Liberals? That makes sense because the rest of us know very well who Amy Barrett is and her stellar record as a person and a judge.Are Trump and the Republicans craven two-faced asswipes by not waiting until after the election before filling RBG's chair?
Yep. Undeniably so. You have to wonder how they can stand their own stench in light of their feigned righteousness vis-à-vis Merrick Garland in 2016.
Is Donald Trump just an empty-headed yes man for the Federalist Society when it comes to filling seats on the Supreme Court?
Yep.
With that said...
None of us ever heard of Amy Coney Barrett until a few days ago. But according to all accounts, she's pro-life, right wing, blah blah blah.
I'm pro-life, so that's good. I'm also an actual conservative (no one seems to know what that is any more) with a libertarian bent.
The Left has had a liberal Supreme Court for, what, the past three thousand years or so.
It's the Right's turn for a while, folks. Get over it.
Define 'moralistic meddling' that is such a broad statement it could be applied to anyone even Atheists and who make up their on 'morals' as they go along.No one exemplifies the saying: "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" better than "concerned moms" and their moralistic meddling. Nothing "adult" is safe from these well meaning busy bodies who think we should all live like 13 year-olds.
Really, is there anyone who thinks the Democrats wouldn't do the same thing? Of course not.There is no hypocrisy. If democrats had the opportunity they would have replaced Scalia with someone far more left than Merrick Garland. Republicans simply have an opportunity that democrats didn’t.
Are Trump and the Republicans craven two-faced asswipes by not waiting until after the election before filling RBG's chair?
Yep. Undeniably so. You have to wonder how they can stand their own stench in light of their feigned righteousness vis-à-vis Merrick Garland in 2016.
Is Donald Trump just an empty-headed yes man for the Federalist Society when it comes to filling seats on the Supreme Court?
Yep.
With that said...
None of us ever heard of Amy Coney Barrett until a few days ago. But according to all accounts, she's pro-life, right wing, blah blah blah.
I'm pro-life, so that's good. I'm also an actual conservative (no one seems to know what that is any more) with a libertarian bent.
The Left has had a liberal Supreme Court for, what, the past three thousand years or so.
It's the Right's turn for a while, folks. Get over it.
Are Trump and the Republicans craven two-faced asswipes by not waiting until after the election before filling RBG's chair?
Yep. Undeniably so. You have to wonder how they can stand their own stench in light of their feigned righteousness vis-à-vis Merrick Garland in 2016.
Is Donald Trump just an empty-headed yes man for the Federalist Society when it comes to filling seats on the Supreme Court?
Yep.
With that said...
None of us ever heard of Amy Coney Barrett until a few days ago. But according to all accounts, she's pro-life, right wing, blah blah blah.
I'm pro-life, so that's good. I'm also an actual conservative (no one seems to know what that is any more) with a libertarian bent.
The Left has had a liberal Supreme Court for, what, the past three thousand years or so.
It's the Right's turn for a while, folks. Get over it.
I guess getting rid of Obamacare won't put your life in jeopardy but it will mine.
Along with millions of other Americans.
My horrendous crime? Getting divorced and having the audacity to fight with everything I have against a very deadly form of cancer that was in both of my breasts.
I lost the insurance I had for 30 years because of divorce. I was safe before Obamacare. I had insurance. Now I don't. Only because I got divorced.
When Obamacare is ruled unconstitutional the insurance company won't renew my policy or jack the rates so high I can't afford it. I don't get any subsidies for my insurance. I pay every penny of the 845 dollars a month for insurance.
I'm not asking for any money from anyone. I'm asking for my own government to not work so hard to make it impossible for me to fight the cancer if it returns. I just want my own government to not work so hard to kill me.
If we are going to be forced to buy private insurance then the government shouldn't make it legal for insurance companies to deny people a policy or rates to sky high people can't afford it. If the government is going to allow that then should offer us a public potion to buy into.
But they don't. They just let people like me die.
It may be about so called "pro life" to you but to me, IT'S LITERALLY MY LIFE.
How pro life is it to cause so many people to die?
How pro life is it to put mine and millions of other American's lives into jeopardy?
Why does an embryo or zygote have more right to life than I do?
There is no hypocrisy. If democrats had the opportunity they would have replaced Scalia with someone far more left than Merrick Garland. Republicans simply have an opportunity that democrats didn’t.
RBG loved her job just a tad too much and a tad too long.
Thanx, Ruthie, wherever u are....
Maybe because there's still a chance that zygote will develop into a sane human being that will replace all the psycho libs in this country.Why does an embryo or zygote have more right to life than I do?
Speak for yourself fool. Trump has been touting this woman for 4 years now. How could you NOT know about her? She was always RBG's replacementNone of us ever heard of Amy Coney Barrett until a few days ago
Why is it that you wingnuts can't seem to comprehend the political distinction between a divided POTUS and Senate vs a united one? It's almost as if you're willfully ignorant for the purpose of your propaganda.Yep. Undeniably so. You have to wonder how they can stand their own stench in light of their feigned righteousness vis-à-vis Merrick Garland in 2016.
I'm sure you are familiar with social conservatives and their habit of stamping out fun. They do not care about liberty or freedom of choice. They have appointed themselves guardians of our immortal souls. This woman is a libertarian nightmare.Define 'moralistic meddling' that is such a broad statement it could be applied to anyone even Atheists and who make up their on 'morals' as they go along.No one exemplifies the saying: "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" better than "concerned moms" and their moralistic meddling. Nothing "adult" is safe from these well meaning busy bodies who think we should all live like 13 year-olds.
The self righteous, Bible thumping, State Womb Police may finally get the statutory authority to place a guard on every fecund woman's and girl's vagina to test for pregnancy. This is to ensure that all females carry the State's spawn to full term for the good of the State.
Religion has no place in our government.
Go see your Parole Officer!The self righteous, Bible thumping, State Womb Police may finally get the statutory authority to place a guard on every fecund woman's and girl's vagina to test for pregnancy. This is to ensure that all females carry the State's spawn to full term for the good of the State.
Religion has no place in our government.
This has the makings of a new superhero: 'Thoughtcrimes, Womb Destoyer!'.
You gonna wear a spandex outfit, too?