If you still believe in deadly climate change, this will help you sleep.

[catatomic]

1. Ocean currents establish climate.
2. The ocean is the largest collector of solar energy.
3. The ocean stores the majority of the planet's heat.
4. The ocean is the largest feature of the planet.
5. The mass of the ocean is 300 times the mass of the atmosphere.
6. The ocean contains 1000 times more heat than the atmosphere.
7. The ocean heats the atmosphere.
8. The atmosphere does not heat the ocean.
9. Physical evidence shows that when ocean currents change, the climate changes.
10. Physical evidence shows ocean currents are responsible for northern hemisphere glaciation and deglaciation.
11. Physical evidence shows ocean currents are responsible for the initiation of the Little Ice Age.
12. Physical evidence shows ocean currents are responsible for the end of the Little Ice Age.

But how does it maintain a temperature rise for 100 years that our models show is due to greenhouse gas; it matches up with greenhouse gas?

 

[catatomic]

1. Ocean currents establish climate.
2. The ocean is the largest collector of solar energy.
3. The ocean stores the majority of the planet's heat.
4. The ocean is the largest feature of the planet.
5. The mass of the ocean is 300 times the mass of the atmosphere.
6. The ocean contains 1000 times more heat than the atmosphere.
7. The ocean heats the atmosphere.
8. The atmosphere does not heat the ocean.
9. Physical evidence shows that when ocean currents change, the climate changes.
10. Physical evidence shows ocean currents are responsible for northern hemisphere glaciation and deglaciation.
11. Physical evidence shows ocean currents are responsible for the initiation of the Little Ice Age.
12. Physical evidence shows ocean currents are responsible for the end of the Little Ice Age.

Anyway I think you're right this causes some climate change, but humans are still the main reason

 

[ReinyDays]

But how does it maintain a temperature rise for 100 years that our models show is due to greenhouse gas; it matches up with greenhouse gas?

Not according to NOAA ... the correct argument against ding's bullshit is climate is driven by power, not energy ... those are two different things ...

1] Climate drives ocean currents ... ding has that backwards ... follow the forces ...

 

[ding]

But how does it maintain a temperature rise for 100 years that our models show is due to greenhouse gas; it matches up with greenhouse gas?

When the northern hemisphere deglaciates the oceans and the atmosphere warm. Happens every interglacial period. The last interglacial period was 2C warmer than today with 120 ppm less CO2.

 

[ding]

Anyway I think you're right this causes some climate change, but humans are still the main reason

Incorrect. The theoretical incremental surface temperature from a doubling of CO2 is 1C. That's it.

 

[gtopa1]

Not according to NOAA ... the correct argument against ding's bullshit is climate is driven by power, not energy ... those are two different things ...

1] Climate drives ocean currents ... ding has that backwards ... follow the forces ...

It's been bullshit since our Greeny Professor told us we were entering a new Ice Age....in 1975. It's the MONEY, stupid!!!

U.S Surface Temperature

October ’25 | 2.56°F (1.42°C) US Climate Reference Network Click for description of the data/larger graph The US Climate Reference Network record from 2005 shows no obvious warming during thi…

wattsupwiththat.com

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://heartland.org/wp-content/uploads/documents/2022_Surface_Station_Report.pdf

BTW: our weather station showed a rapid rise in warming WHEN THEY MOVED IT FROM THE RANGE, where it has been for a century or more, to near the airport away from the range. They did a similar thing in Darwin moving it from Fanny Bay to Winnellie. Frankly the "science" is right but the actors are manipulating liars!!

Greg

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well stop pricking and start reading!!!

And Europeans better worry about that, she adds!

According to Apollo, Ms. Peter bases her claim on an article that once appeared in the German leftist TAZ newspaper, which reported how a geologist speculated that melting of glaciers could possibly trigger earthquakes.

Ms. Peter reacted to the earthquake: “Wow, the massive quake in Myanmar and Thailand was also measurable in Europe.” … ‘“We know that earthquakes will continue to increase with the climate crisis, this is worrying for many parts of the world.”

“Geologists are increasingly in agreement that there is a link between the climate crisis and earthquakes,” she continued.

Peter’s claim are of course utterly preposterous as there are no glaciers anywhere near Thailand and Myanmar to begin with. Earthquakes are instead caused by moving tectonic plates that have been shifting for hundreds of millions of years.

If Peter’s claims haven’t convinced you by now that the “climate crisis” is a hoax perpetrated by greens and leftists, then nothing will. Consider yourself scientifically hopeless.

Massive Thailand-Myanmar Quake Triggered By The Climate Crisis, Suggests Former Green Party Leader

If Peter’s claims haven’t convinced you by now that the “climate crisis” is a hoax perpetrated by greens and leftists, then nothing will. Consider yourself scientifically hopeless.

wattsupwiththat.com

Greg

Oh look,blog educated idiots having a circle jerk.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Anyway I think you're right this causes some climate change, but humans are still the main reason

Human activity is the main reason for the rapid warming we have observed over the last 100 years. No, ding did not outsmart the entire global scientific community or upend the most robust scientific theory in history by plagiarizing a blog.

 

[ding]

Human activity is the main reason for the rapid warming we have observed over the last 100 years. No, ding did not outsmart the entire global scientific community or upend the most robust scientific theory in history by plagiarizing a blog.

The warming trend that began 400 years ago.

 

[ding]

Not according to NOAA ... the correct argument against ding's bullshit is climate is driven by power, not energy ... those are two different things ...

1] Climate drives ocean currents ... ding has that backwards ... follow the forces ...

You are a moron. Ocean currents are driven by differences in density which are driven by differences in salinity and temperature. Maybe look into thermohaline circulation. The earth - including it's oceans - is not heated evenly, dummy. Given that you fancy yourself as "the weatherman" I would have thought you would have understood the consequences of the uneven heating of the planet's surfaces.

 

[catatomic]

You are a moron. Ocean currents are driven by differences in density which are driven by differences in salinity and temperature. Maybe look into thermohaline circulation. The earth - including it's oceans - is not heated evenly, dummy. Given that you fancy yourself as "the weatherman" I would have thought you would have understood the consequences of the uneven heating of the planet's surfaces.

What Fort Indiana said

 

[daveman]

My friends who are professors are not in it for the money.

Uh huh.

Western economies? We don't have to stray from capitalism but you sound like you want to cut off your nose to spite your face.

Everyone with any clout in the AGW cult is pushing world socialism. This is undeniable. Stop denying it.

I am serious and I will never give up on your vote.

Give up on it. You offer nothing I'm interested in.

Chat GPT = the whole Internet in, it analyzed extremely well, and written well.

The whole internet is full of bullshit. If you haven't learned this basic fact by now, you're not going to.

 

[daveman]

Oh look,blog educated idiots having a circle jerk.

Oh, look, a gullible leftist who instantly believes everything his masters tell him is offering a rebuttal.

The rebuttal is, 'NUH UH!!!"

 

[catatomic]

Everyone with any clout in the AGW cult is pushing world socialism. This is undeniable. Stop denying it.

Not him. And he went to MIT.

The whole internet is full of bullshit. If you haven't learned this basic fact by now, you're not going to.

What does that say about you?

 

[catatomic]

Fighting climate change is a leftist-leaning issue. Most people are very one-sided. That is the only reason why people who want to fight climate change so bad are often left.

Historically, it has been an issue for the right as well. So if cooler heads prevail and both parties cooperate it's better.

 

[ding]

What Fort Indiana said

You know how I know you don't believe in AGW? Your carbon footprint is no different than the average American. It's not what you say that matters. It's what you do.

 

[catatomic]

You know how I know you don't believe in AGW? Your carbon footprint is no different than the average American. It's not what you say that matters. It's what you do.

Don't flatter me. My carbon footprint is extremely good stop trolling

 

[ding]

The whole internet is full of bullshit.

The geologic record isn't bullshit. These are the relevant graphs for discussing the planet's current climate.

 

[ding]

Don't flatter me. My carbon footprint is extremely good stop trolling

And by pretty good you mean not materially different than the average American. I'm not trolling you, I am pointing out your hypocrisy. Put your money where your mouth is.

 

[Sunsettommy]

And by pretty good you mean not materially different than the average American. I'm not trolling you, I am pointing out your hypocrisy. Put your money where your mouth is.

He is just another brainwashed climate change acolyte who can't muster up a cogent argument an anything.